An interventional study of Basic Life Support training based on ICTs and Classic Basic Life Support training in Cardiac Arrest, Out-Of-Hospital, sponsored by Universidad de Antioquia. Withdrawn at 1 site in Colombia. Open to participants aged 14 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-09.
Sponsored by Universidad de Antioquia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
With the increase in life expectancy of the general population and advances in medicine, there is now a population with a higher amount of cardiovascular diseases that lead to an increased risk of sudden cardiac arrest. In most cases, this occurs in extra-hospital settings such as family homes, shopping centres, public transport and before people without any knowledge or training in basic life support. On the other hand, for every minute that passes without adequate attention of the victim, the probability of surviving or continuing to live with neurological severe sequelae decreases by 10%.
In developed countries, public policies have been created to encourage basic life support education to the general population. In Colombia, because of the high prevalence of these diseases and the need for public health strategies, a law was issued to provide access to automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) in public places. However, it has not been developed strategies for education on this subject.
For that reason, the investigators created an educational strategy of self-learning, which consists of a complete basic life support course based in new Information and Communication technologies with tools to manufacture a mannequin and a homemade DEA, which will allow continuous training, with a very low cost compared to traditional life support training.
The clinical trial will compare that two educational strategies, evaluating as primary aid, which approach has higher knowledge retention of life support chain at 6 months in students after the workshop. As secondary objectives, the investigators would evaluate the efficient in terms of response times, costs and student satisfaction.
This study will be carried out in high school students from two different high schools, without prior training in Life support. Both strategies will be distributed randomly. The experimental group will carry out the self-learning strategy based on ICT (Information and Communication Technologies), with which they will be retrained every month, and the control group will carry out the conventional training only once as usual. Subsequently, each of the objectives will be evaluated at six months.
It is proposed that the self-learning strategy is superior compared to conventional training, requiring fewer resources to perform it and allows constant retraining, which improves retention and quality in a resuscitation process.
966 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Arrest; 227 are open to participants now.
Browse Heart Arrest studies →Universidad de Antioquia is the lead sponsor of 79 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
It will be conformed with students from one highschool random selected. They will receive a basic life support training based on Information and communication technologies.
Other: Basic Life Support training based on ICTs
It will be conformed with students from another highschool random selected. They will receive a full and conventional basic life support training based on American and Hear Association recommendations.
Other: Classic Basic Life Support training
This intervention is defined as a self-training course consisting of a 5-minute educational video in basic life support and a Kit with the elements to build the home dummy and the home DEA allowing integrally students to develop the steps as the video. The Kit will be delivered at the beginning of the study and every month the necessary materials will be complemented. The strategy will be carried out by the students every month and supervised by their teachers. Students will have constant access to an educational platform based on ICTs.
It is defined as a module carried out by trained personnel in basic resuscitation (pre-hospital care program staff of the UdeA medical school), which includes two subcomponents of the conventional BLS course that are basic resuscitation and DEA in adults. The duration of the subcomponents is a theoretical part of 30 minutes and a practical part in a low fidelity simulator with 1.5 hours duration.
Quality in survival chain in basic life support
It will be a composed outcome of 6 aspects in a check list and the student must comply ALL item to consider as a positive result in good quality in basic life support, the items are: I. Recognition of a person in cardiorespiratory arrest II. Activate the survival chain to survive III. Start chest compressions during or after activating the chain. IV. Chest compressions between 100-120 V. Proper use of AED VI. No interruptions should made during the thoracic compressions cycle. The result will be presented in proportion of students who completed ALL previous items.
Time frame: 6 months
Time of survival chain activation
Time in seconds that takes the student to perform the following components of the survival chain: * Identification of the victim * Emergency system activation. * Start of chest compressions. * Implementation of the AED strategy.
Time frame: 6 months
Student Satisfaction
The satisfaction scale will be applied to all students. We will use a satisfaction scale developed and validated in Oviedo´s University, Asturias, Spain. It is a seven items scale. Each item is evaluated in 4 points Likert scale. The minimum value is 1, and the maximum value is 4 for each item. We will evaluate these scale independently and present results in number and percentage en each item.
Time frame: 6 months
Costs
We will evaluate the cost in US dolar of each intervention in the different activities related to executions of the interventions in each arm.
Time frame: 6 months
Plan to share: No
This study is withdrawn, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Universidad de Antioquia