A Phase 4 interventional study of Bicarbonate protocol and Standard protocol in Overactive Bladder, Overactive Detrusor and Overactive Bladder Syndrome, sponsored by Boston Urogynecology Associates. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-06.
Sponsored by Boston Urogynecology Associates · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
This will be a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing two pre-treatment protocols for patients undergoing intradetrussor botox injections to determine if a buffered lidocaine solution offers superior pain control.
Lidocaine is a commonly used amide-type local anesthetic. Lidocaine exists as both a quaternary water soluble structure, and a tertiary lipid-soluble structure. Only the tertiary lipid-soluble structure can cross the lipid bilayer of a cell membrane and thereby enter a neurons axoplasm and induce the desired effect. The ionization constant of lidocaine is 7.7 which means that at a pH of 7.7, 50% of lidocaine is available in the tertiary lipid-soluble structure. At a physiologic pH between 7.35 and 7.45 only around 44% of lidocaine is in the tertiary lipid-soluble structure. However, for lidocaine to be stable in solution, it is typically formulated as a hydrochloride salt and the pH of most commercially available lidocaine solutions are at a pH of 6.09. In an acidic solution the majority of lidocaine is available in the quaternary water-soluble structure and at this pH only 2.5% of lidocaine is in the tertiary lipid-soluble structure. A Cochrane review found that increasing the pH of lidocaine prior to injection decreased pain and increased patient satisfaction perhaps because of the aforementioned pharmacokinetic principles.
Lidocaine is typically used as anesthetic for intradetrussor injections of onabotulinum toxin A for the treatment of refractory overactive bladder. In 2003, a technique for intradetrussor injections of onabotulinum toxin A was first described using only local anesthesia. At that time, the procedure involved intrauerthral lidocaine. The procedure has evolved since that time and currently many physicians utilize protocols with both utraurethral and intravesical lidocaine. At baseline intradetrusor onabotulinum toxin A injections are generally well tolerated and with reported mean VAS scores around 3.
For patients with refractory overactive bladder, the standard of care is intradetrussor onabotulinum toxin A injections. The standard protocol used by the investigators involves emptying the bladder then retrograde filling the bladder with a 1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine normal saline. This solution remains in the bladder for approximately 15 minutes prior to injection. Given that urine is typically acidic and commercially available lidocaine solutions are similarly acidic, it is likely that only a fraction of intravesical lidocaine is in the active tertiary lipid-soluble form. The goal of this study is to determine if the investigators can improve the procedural pain of intradetrusor onabotulinum toxin A injections using a buffered solution compared to our standard solution.
After approval by the IRB, investigators will approach possible participants who are having intradetrussor botox injection for overactive bladder which is the standard of care for patients with refractory overactive bladder. If the patient meets eligibility criteria, consent forms will be signed and the patient will be randomized 1:1 to receive either our standard pretreatment regimen with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 50ml of 0.9% normal saline or our buffered bicarbonate protocol with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 45ml of 0.9% normal saline + 5 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. The primary end point of this trial is to assess the pain scores measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) immediately following the procedure. Secondary end points include patient satisfaction, willingness to undergo repeat treatment and adverse events.
All subjects will be randomized 1:1 at the first intervention visit to one of the two protocols using a random block design . At the completion of the procedure, patients will be asked to complete a brief questionnaire about their experience. Patients will follow up in clinic for a post-void residual check two weeks after the procedure as is standard for our clinical practice.
858 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive; 127 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 85 is above the median of 70 across 649 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive.
Browse Urinary Bladder, Overactive studies →Boston Urogynecology Associates is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.
“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.
Line of therapy
A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.
“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
50 mL 1% lidocaine + 45ml of 0.9% normal saline + 5 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate
Drug: Bicarbonate protocol
50 mL 1% lidocaine + 50ml of 0.9% normal saline
Drug: Standard protocol
Intradetrussor treatment with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 45ml of 0.9% normal saline + 5 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate
Intradetrussor treatment with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 50ml of 0.9% normal saline
Pain: VAS
Pain on visual analog scale from 0-100 with higher scores worse
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure
Satisfaction: Likert Scale
Likert scale questions assessing overall satisfaction with the procedure with responses from very 1 (dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) with higher scores representing more satisfaction. We reported the percentage of participants who were satisfied we defined as a response of 4 or 5.
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure
Willingness to Undergo Repeat Procedure
Likert scale questions assessing the patient's willingness to undergo a repeat procedure from very likely (1) to very unlikely (5) with five items total. We defined willingness to undergo repeat procedure as a score of 1 or 2 on the Likert scale and outcome measured was the percentage of patients who responded with a 1 or 2.
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure
| Milestone | Active Treatment | Placebo Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 38 | 38 |
| Completed | 36 | 37 |
| Not completed | 2 | 1 |
Pain on visual analog scale from 0-100 with higher scores worse
| units on a scale, 0-100 | Active Treatment | Placebo Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Pain: VAS | 25 (15 to 55) | 16 (9 to 40) |
Likert scale questions assessing overall satisfaction with the procedure with responses from very 1 (dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) with higher scores representing more satisfaction. We reported the percentage of participants who were satisfied we defined as a response of 4 or 5.
| percentage of participants with 4 or 5 | Active Treatment | Placebo Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction: Likert Scale | 68 | 39 |
Likert scale questions assessing the patient's willingness to undergo a repeat procedure from very likely (1) to very unlikely (5) with five items total. We defined willingness to undergo repeat procedure as a score of 1 or 2 on the Likert scale and outcome measured was the percentage of patients who responded with a 1 or 2.
| percentage of participants | Active Treatment | Placebo Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Willingness to Undergo Repeat Procedure | 72 | 65 |
Collected over 1 hour. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Treatment | 0/37 (0%) | 0/36 (0%) | 0/37 (0%) |
| Placebo Treatment | 0/36 (0%) | 0/37 (0%) | 0/36 (0%) |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Active Treatment | Placebo Treatment | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 74 (67 to 78) | 71 (65 to 78) | 72 (66 to 78) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Active Treatment | Placebo Treatment | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 37 | 36 | 73 |
| Male | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Active Treatment | Placebo Treatment | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| White | 32 | 30 | 62 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 2 | 6 | 8 |
PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.
Plan to share: No
Ran from Aug 2020 to primary completion in Jun 2023, 34 months.
Results were first posted in Mar 2025, 1 year 8 months after primary completion.
Of 42 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Urinary Bladder, Overactive, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 51. This study's 34 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 54 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 48.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Boston Urogynecology Associates