ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04270526Updated Mar 6, 2025Results posted

Minimizing Pain During Office Intradetrussor Botox Injection

A Phase 4 interventional study of Bicarbonate protocol and Standard protocol in Overactive Bladder, Overactive Detrusor and Overactive Bladder Syndrome, sponsored by Boston Urogynecology Associates. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-06.

Sponsored by Boston Urogynecology Associates · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
85
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This will be a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing two pre-treatment protocols for patients undergoing intradetrussor botox injections to determine if a buffered lidocaine solution offers superior pain control.

Read the detailed description

Lidocaine is a commonly used amide-type local anesthetic. Lidocaine exists as both a quaternary water soluble structure, and a tertiary lipid-soluble structure. Only the tertiary lipid-soluble structure can cross the lipid bilayer of a cell membrane and thereby enter a neurons axoplasm and induce the desired effect. The ionization constant of lidocaine is 7.7 which means that at a pH of 7.7, 50% of lidocaine is available in the tertiary lipid-soluble structure. At a physiologic pH between 7.35 and 7.45 only around 44% of lidocaine is in the tertiary lipid-soluble structure. However, for lidocaine to be stable in solution, it is typically formulated as a hydrochloride salt and the pH of most commercially available lidocaine solutions are at a pH of 6.09. In an acidic solution the majority of lidocaine is available in the quaternary water-soluble structure and at this pH only 2.5% of lidocaine is in the tertiary lipid-soluble structure. A Cochrane review found that increasing the pH of lidocaine prior to injection decreased pain and increased patient satisfaction perhaps because of the aforementioned pharmacokinetic principles.

Lidocaine is typically used as anesthetic for intradetrussor injections of onabotulinum toxin A for the treatment of refractory overactive bladder. In 2003, a technique for intradetrussor injections of onabotulinum toxin A was first described using only local anesthesia. At that time, the procedure involved intrauerthral lidocaine. The procedure has evolved since that time and currently many physicians utilize protocols with both utraurethral and intravesical lidocaine. At baseline intradetrusor onabotulinum toxin A injections are generally well tolerated and with reported mean VAS scores around 3.

For patients with refractory overactive bladder, the standard of care is intradetrussor onabotulinum toxin A injections. The standard protocol used by the investigators involves emptying the bladder then retrograde filling the bladder with a 1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine normal saline. This solution remains in the bladder for approximately 15 minutes prior to injection. Given that urine is typically acidic and commercially available lidocaine solutions are similarly acidic, it is likely that only a fraction of intravesical lidocaine is in the active tertiary lipid-soluble form. The goal of this study is to determine if the investigators can improve the procedural pain of intradetrusor onabotulinum toxin A injections using a buffered solution compared to our standard solution.

After approval by the IRB, investigators will approach possible participants who are having intradetrussor botox injection for overactive bladder which is the standard of care for patients with refractory overactive bladder. If the patient meets eligibility criteria, consent forms will be signed and the patient will be randomized 1:1 to receive either our standard pretreatment regimen with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 50ml of 0.9% normal saline or our buffered bicarbonate protocol with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 45ml of 0.9% normal saline + 5 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. The primary end point of this trial is to assess the pain scores measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) immediately following the procedure. Secondary end points include patient satisfaction, willingness to undergo repeat treatment and adverse events.

All subjects will be randomized 1:1 at the first intervention visit to one of the two protocols using a random block design . At the completion of the procedure, patients will be asked to complete a brief questionnaire about their experience. Patients will follow up in clinic for a post-void residual check two weeks after the procedure as is standard for our clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Overactive Bladder
  • Overactive Detrusor
  • Overactive Bladder Syndrome
  • Overactivity; Behavior
  • Urge Incontinence
03

In context

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

858 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive; 127 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 85 is above the median of 70 across 649 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive.

Browse Urinary Bladder, Overactive studies →

Lead sponsor

Boston Urogynecology Associates is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female patient
  • Primary diagnosis of overactive bladder
  • Failed first and therapy for overactive bladder
  • Planning to undergo bladder botox injections

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurogenic bladder
  • Urinary retention
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
85 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active treatment

    50 mL 1% lidocaine + 45ml of 0.9% normal saline + 5 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate

    Drug: Bicarbonate protocol

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo treatment

    50 mL 1% lidocaine + 50ml of 0.9% normal saline

    Drug: Standard protocol

Interventions

  • DrugBicarbonate protocol

    Intradetrussor treatment with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 45ml of 0.9% normal saline + 5 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate

  • DrugStandard protocol

    Intradetrussor treatment with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 50ml of 0.9% normal saline

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain: VAS

    Pain on visual analog scale from 0-100 with higher scores worse

    Time frame: Immediately after the procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Satisfaction: Likert Scale

    Likert scale questions assessing overall satisfaction with the procedure with responses from very 1 (dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) with higher scores representing more satisfaction. We reported the percentage of participants who were satisfied we defined as a response of 4 or 5.

    Time frame: Immediately after the procedure

  2. Willingness to Undergo Repeat Procedure

    Likert scale questions assessing the patient's willingness to undergo a repeat procedure from very likely (1) to very unlikely (5) with five items total. We defined willingness to undergo repeat procedure as a score of 1 or 2 on the Likert scale and outcome measured was the percentage of patients who responded with a 1 or 2.

    Time frame: Immediately after the procedure

07

Results

Posted Mar 6, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneActive TreatmentPlacebo Treatment
Started3838
Completed3637
Not completed21

Outcome measures

PrimaryPain: VAS

Pain on visual analog scale from 0-100 with higher scores worse

Time frame:
Immediately after the procedure
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale, 0-100
Pain: VAS
units on a scale, 0-100Active TreatmentPlacebo Treatment
Pain: VAS25 (15 to 55)16 (9 to 40)
SecondarySatisfaction: Likert Scale

Likert scale questions assessing overall satisfaction with the procedure with responses from very 1 (dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) with higher scores representing more satisfaction. We reported the percentage of participants who were satisfied we defined as a response of 4 or 5.

Time frame:
Immediately after the procedure
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants with 4 or 5
Satisfaction: Likert Scale
percentage of participants with 4 or 5Active TreatmentPlacebo Treatment
Satisfaction: Likert Scale6839
SecondaryWillingness to Undergo Repeat Procedure

Likert scale questions assessing the patient's willingness to undergo a repeat procedure from very likely (1) to very unlikely (5) with five items total. We defined willingness to undergo repeat procedure as a score of 1 or 2 on the Likert scale and outcome measured was the percentage of patients who responded with a 1 or 2.

Time frame:
Immediately after the procedure
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Willingness to Undergo Repeat Procedure
percentage of participantsActive TreatmentPlacebo Treatment
Willingness to Undergo Repeat Procedure7265

Adverse events

Collected over 1 hour. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active Treatment0/37 (0%)0/36 (0%)0/37 (0%)
Placebo Treatment0/36 (0%)0/37 (0%)0/36 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Active TreatmentPlacebo TreatmentTotal
Median74 (67 to 78)71 (65 to 78)72 (66 to 78)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Active TreatmentPlacebo TreatmentTotal
Female373673
Male000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Active TreatmentPlacebo TreatmentTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American202
White323062
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported268
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Boston Urogynecology Associates
    Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2020 to primary completion in Jun 2023, 34 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2025, 1 year 8 months after primary completion.

Of 42 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Urinary Bladder, Overactive, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 51. This study's 34 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 54 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 12, 2020
First posted
Feb 17, 2020
StartActual
Aug 15, 2020
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2023
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2023
Results first posted
Mar 6, 2025
Last update
Mar 6, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04270526
Lead sponsor
Boston Urogynecology Associates
Responsible party
William D. Winkelman (Clinical Instructor, Boston Urogynecology Associates) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 17, 2020
Start date
Aug 15, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2023
Completion
Jun 30, 2023
Results posted
Mar 6, 2025
Last update
Mar 6, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion