ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04267159AFFELECTUpdated May 22, 2026

Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter Treated Electively

An interventional study of Acute cardioversion and Delayed cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter, sponsored by Tampere University. Recruiting at 4 sites in Finland. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-22.

Sponsored by Tampere University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2020; still recruiting 6 years 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
500
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The AFFELECT -study compares two types of treatment modalities for acute atrial fibrillation or flutter for patients in whom rhythm control is desirable. The main purpose is to observe if these arrhythmias can be safely treated electively (within 5-9 days).

All patients are recruited in the emergency department. Patients must be in good clinical condition so that they can be discharged regardless to which treatment modality is randomly selected to them. Patients randomized to conventional care are treated conventionally which means acute rhythm control is applied by electrical or medical cardioversion in the emergency department (within 48 hours of onset of the arrhythmia). Patients randomized to elective care are discharged immediately after adequate temporary rhythm control is assured.

All patients will visit a cardiologist out-patient clinic at approximately one week after the emergency room visit. Patients randomized to elective treatment and still in atrial fibrillation or in atrial flutter will be restored to sinus rhythm by electrical or medical cardioversion at the out-patient clinic. Cardiovascular status and treatment options are evaluated for all patients.

Anticoagulation is managed according existing guidelines for all patients. Due to possibility of delayed cardioversion in the interventional group (elective care group), all patients receive anticoagulation before the out-patient clinic despite their thromboembolic risk. All patients who have not received adequate anticoagulation for three weeks prior to the delayed cardioversion will undergo a transesophageal cardiac ultrasound to ensure they are not in excess risk for thromboembolic events. Patients randomized to elective treatment have the possibility to opt-out and undergo acute cardioversion if their symptoms are unmanageable during the first week before the out-patient clinical.

All patients are monitored for their symptoms by a standardized quality-of-life questionnaire and for possibly required acute medical interventions during the first week and one month after the out-patient clinic. After one month, all patients undergo an electrocardiography (ECG) to ensure the maintenance of normal rhythm in both treatment groups. After the months follow-up all patients are subsequently monitored for a maximum of five years for need of medical interventions due to atrial fibrillation of atrial flutter. New antiarrhythmics such as flecainide are not prescribed during the first month.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Atrial Flutter
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

4,009 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 961 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 150 across 2,476 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Tampere University is the lead sponsor of 63 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients presenting with acute (\<48hours) atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter to ER
  • Planned acute rhythm control for the arrhythmia by the attending physician in ER
  • Good perceived health as assessed by attending physician in ER
  • Resting heart rate 110bpm or lower before or after adequate rate control therapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Haemodynamically stable (mean arterial pressure above 60mmHg)
  • Need for acute restoration of sinus rhythm due to some other somatic cause
  • No other major complicating acute illness (e.g. decompensated HF or acute MI)
  • Anticoagulation not safe
  • Mechanical heart valve or mitral stenosis
  • The need for prolonged (>24h) hospitalization due to any cause
  • Exceptionally high risk for thromboembolic events (e.g. history of thromboembolic stroke regardless of adequate anticoagulation)
  • Transesophageal echocardiography
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Conventional treatment by acute cardioversion

    Participants in the conventional treatment arm will be returned to sinus rhythm in the emergency department within 48 hours of symptom onset unless they convert to sinus rhythm spontaneously.

    Other: Acute cardioversion

  • Experimental
    Elective treatment by delayed cardioversion

    Participants in the elective treatment arm will be returned to sinus rhythm in an out-patient clinic approximately one week after randomizatio unless they convert to sinus rhythm spontaneously.

    Other: Delayed cardioversion

Interventions

  • OtherAcute cardioversion

    Acute restoration of sinus rhythm by medical or electrical cardioversion in the emergency department

  • OtherDelayed cardioversion

    Delayed restoration of sinus rhythm by medical or electrical cardioversion in the out-patient clinic

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sinus Rhythm

    Prevalence of sinus rhythm in the treatment arms measured by electrocardiography

    Time frame: One month after preplanned out-patient clinic visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of cardioversions after emergency department

    The number of performed cardioversions (electrical or medical)

    Time frame: First week after randomization and before the preplanned out-patient clinic

  2. Number of cardioversions after out-patient clinic

    The number of performed cardioversions (electrical or medical)

    Time frame: One month after out-patient clinic

  3. Overall number of cardioversions

    The number of performed cardioversions (electrical or medical)

    Time frame: From randomization to the end of first month follow-up after out-patient clinic visit

  4. Drop-out from delayed cardioversion group

    The number of subjects needing unplanned cardioversion before preplanned out-patient clinic visit (four days or earlier after randomization) due to medical reasons or due to subjectively perceived unbearable symptoms (EHRA III or IV).

    Time frame: Four days or earlier after randomization to elective (delayed) treatment group

  5. Rehospitalization due to cardiovascular causes

    Rehospitalization due to any cardiovascular cause

    Time frame: One week before and one month after out-patient clinic visit

  6. Immediate quality of life

    Quality of life as assessed by questionnaires depicting quality of life (AFEQT)

    Time frame: First week after randomization and before the preplanned out-patient clinic

  7. Quality of life after out-patient clinic

    Quality of life as assessed by questionnaires depicting quality of life (AFEQT)

    Time frame: One month after out-patient clinic

07

Study locations

3 of 4 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rankinen J, Lyytikainen LP, Jarventie J, Hautamaki M, Numminen A, Hurskainen M, Rantanen M, Muuronen A, Tynkkynen J, Hernesniemi J. Acute atrial fibrillation and flutter treated electively: rationale and design of the randomized controlled AFFELECT trial. Eur Heart J Open. 2026 Apr 13;6(2):oeag060. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeag060. eCollection 2026 Mar. PubMed 42064618 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD can be shared only upon reasonable request after full anonymization by the discretion of the study review board.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 88 months after the start.

Of 796 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Atrial Fibrillation, half reached primary completion within 40 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 59. This study's planned 88 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,051 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 54.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 10, 2020
First posted
Feb 12, 2020
StartActual
Feb 10, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 2029
Last update
May 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04267159
Lead sponsor
Tampere University
Responsible party
Jussi Hernesniemi (Professor, Tampere University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 12, 2020
Start date
Feb 10, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Last update
May 22, 2026

Study contacts

Jussi A Hernesniemi, MD, PhD
Contact
jussi.hernesniemi@sydansairaala.fi
31164254 ext. +358
Tero Penttilä, MD, PhD
Contact
tero.penttila@sydansairaala.fi
Jussi A Hernesniemi, MD, PhD
principal investigator · TAYS Heart Hospital and Tampere University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion