ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04266639ENOSUpdated Feb 17, 2022

Rheo-Erythrocrine Dysfunction as a Biomarker for RIC Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke

An interventional study of Remote Ischemic Conditioning and Sham Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Stroke, Acute, Ischemic Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disorders, sponsored by Grethe Andersen. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-17.

Primary conditionIschemic StrokeRegistry: StrokeReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Stroke — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Ischemic Stroke
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Ischemic Stroke, a narrower term within Stroke.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Grethe Andersen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 51 studies in Ischemic Stroke with a site in Denmark — 12 open to participants now, 15 under way, 3 of them phase 3. Ischemic Stroke · Denmark.

Enrollment
29th of 36
45 · median 224
Started
2020
with 2 others
No phase
18 of 51
4 open now
Registered
34th of 51
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 51
Grethe Andersen

Among the 51 studies in Ischemic Stroke with a site in Denmark, this one is the 29th largest by enrollment of the 36 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2020, is one of 18 with no phase, and was the 34th registered.

Ischemic Stroke

2,612 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 971 are open to participants now.

Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →

Open to participants now

12 of the 51 studies in Ischemic Stroke with a site in Denmark are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

7 more — sign in →

All 12 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Denmark have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Denmark →

Who these studies take

Of the 655 Ischemic Stroke studies recruiting now, 394 (60%) set no upper age limit and 62 (9%) stop at 75 or younger; 26 take children under 18; 41 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 80 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 51 studies in Ischemic Stroke with a site in Denmark, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study aims to investigate whether Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) improves rheo-erythrocrine dysfunction in acute ischemic stroke

Read the detailed description

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Of all strokes, 85% are ischemic strokes caused by a thrombus or an embolus. The additional 15% are caused by hemorrhage. Currently the only approved treatments for ischemic strokes are thrombolysis given within 4.5 hours and thrombectomy performed within 6 hours of symptom onset - in some cases up to 24 hours. The majority of stroke patients are not however eligible for acute reperfusion therapy, mainly due to time constrains and late presentation. Novel neuroprotective strategies available for all stroke patients are thus urgently needed.

Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) is a simple intervention in which transient ischemia is induced in an extremity by repetitive inflation-deflation of a blood pressure cuff. It remains uncertain exactly how the protective effect of RIC is transmitted and communicated between the extremity and the brain. Both humoral, immunological and neuronal pathways seem to be involved. Treatment with RIC and has proven to be a safe, feasible and low-cost treatment in clinical settings.

Biomarkers of the RIC treatment is a new area of stroke research and are important to establish in order to assess and predict responders of the conditioning treatment. Rheo-erythrocrine dysfunction of the Red Blood Cell (RBC) is a novel biomarker in both ischemic strokes in general and on the effect of RIC. Red Blood Cells with a diameter of 6-8 μm must be highly deformable in order to deliver oxygen to brain tissue by travelling through micro vessels with a diameter of just 2-3 μm. RBC's can carry nitric oxide as NO2-/s-nitrosylated proteins. These proteins improve RBC deformability and induce hypoxic vasodilation thereby improving passage through the microvasculature. RBC's also express Erythrocyte Nitric Oxide Synthase 3, which regulate the rheo-erythrocrine function. Erythrocyte Nitric Oxide Synthase 3 is activated by shear stress and provide an extra source of NO for hypoxic vasodilation. Preliminary data have shown that experimental stroke on mice seems to cause a rheo-erythrocrine dysfunction of the RBC's leading to a loss of deformability. The RBC's become rigid, which can lead to occlusion of micro vessels in the brain and further ischemic damage. Loss of deformability can be measured as a reduced Elongation Index (EI) by ektacytometry and may be attenuated by RIC.

03

Conditions studied

  • Stroke, Acute
  • Ischemic Stroke
  • Cerebrovascular Disorders
  • Central Nervous System Diseases

Keywords

  • Remote Ischemic Conditioning
  • Neuroprotection
04

In context

Ischemic Stroke Reclassified

2,612 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 971 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is below the median of 120 across 1,776 interventional studies indexed under Ischemic Stroke.

Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Grethe Andersen is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Compared within Ischemic Stroke, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Stroke. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

05

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

STROKE PATIENTS

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Onset to randomization \< 48 hours
  • Independent in daily living (mRS 0-2)
  • Legal competent
  • Ambulatory
  • Documented ischemic stroke on baseline MRI

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior stroke, dementia or other known neurological condition Pregnancy
  • to MRI
  • Investigators discretion
  • Known upper extremity peripheral arterial stenosis Diabetes

CONTROLS

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Independent in daily living (mRS 0-2) Ambulatory
  • Legal competent
  • Non vascular diagnosis (e.g. epilepsy, migraine etc.)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Prior stroke, dementia or other known neurological condition
  • Pregnancy
  • Contraindications to MRI
  • Investigators discretion
  • Known upper extremity peripheral arterial stenosis Diabetes
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

06

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Remote Ischemic Conditioning

    Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) is applied during the in-hospital phase using an automated RIC device. Treatment characteristics: Five cycles (50 minutes), each consisting of five minutes of cuff inflation followed by five minutes of cuff deflation. The cuff pressure will be 200 mmHg; if initial systolic blood pressure is above 175 mmHg, the cuff is automatically inflated to 35 mmHg above the systolic blood pressure. * Initial Remote Ischemic Conditioning: \< 2 hours from inclusion * Remote Ischemic Postconditioning: twice daily for 7 days Usual care with or without acute reperfusion therapy

    Device: Remote Ischemic Conditioning

  • Sham comparator
    Sham - Remote Ischemic Conditioning

    Sham Remote Ischemic Conditioning (Sham-RIC) is applied during the in-hospital phase using an automated Sham-RIC device. Treatment characteristics: Five cycles (50 minutes), each consisting of five minutes of cuff inflation followed by five minutes of cuff deflation. The cuff pressure will be always be 20 mmHg. * Initial Sham Remote Ischemic Conditioning: \< 2 hours from inclusion * Sham Remote ischemic Postconditioning: twice daily for 7 days Usual care with or without acute reperfusion therapy.

    Device: Sham Remote Ischemic Conditioning

  • No intervention
    Controls

    The control group will not receive treatment with Remote Ischemic Conditioning.

Interventions

  • DeviceRemote Ischemic Conditioning

    RIC is commonly achieved by inflation of a blood pressure cuff to induce 5-minute cycles of limb ischemia alternating with 5 minutes of reperfusion

  • DeviceSham Remote Ischemic Conditioning

    Sham Comparator (Sham-RIC)

07

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. RBC deformability will serve as a biomarker of the conditioning response and predictor of the clinical outcome in stroke patients.

    RBC deformability is measured as Deformability or Elongation Index (DI or EI, Rheoscan AnD-300, RheoMeditech, South Chorea). A higher EI at the optimum viscosity (300 Osmolality) indicates highly deformable RBCs indicative of better microcirculation, while a lower EI indicates rigid RBC's. Briefly, 6 µL of heparinized or EDTA treated fresh blood is mixed with 600-µL of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) solution (300 Osm) and transferred to a disposable kit. The kit is placed inside the laser-assisted ectacytometer for automated read out, data and image collection as per the vendor's instructions.

    Time frame: 1 week

  2. RBC deformability will serve as a biomarker of the conditioning response and predictor of the clinical outcome in stroke patients

    For measurement of shear stress, 0,5 mL of heparinized or EDTA treated fresh blood is mixed with 600-µL of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) solution (300 Osm) and transferred to a disposable kit. The kit is placed inside the laser-assisted ectacytometer for automated read out, data and image collection as per the vendor's instructions.

    Time frame: 1 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Nitric oxide quantification using DAF-FM-Diacetate flowcytometry as a biomarker of the conditioning response

    Analytical flowcytometry with DAF-FM-Diacetate (4-Amino-5-Methylamino-2',7'-Difluorofluorescein Diacetate) on wholeblood samples

    Time frame: 1 week

  2. Nitric oxide quantification using DAF-FM-Diacetate flowcytometry as a predictor of the short term clinical outcome in stroke patients

    Analytical flowcytometry with DAF-FM-Diacetate (4-Amino-5-Methylamino-2',7'-Difluorofluorescein Diacetate) on wholeblood samples

    Time frame: 1 week

  3. RBC deformability presentation across stroke subtypes

    Ektacytometry (see primary outcome)

    Time frame: 1 week

  4. RBC deformability in relation to infarct size/stroke severity

    Ektacytometry (see primary outcome)

    Time frame: 1 week

  5. RBC erythrocrine dysfunction (NOS3) presentation across stroke subtypes

    Comparison of RBC Nitric Oxide Synthestase 3 activation (flowcytometry) across stroke subtypes.

    Time frame: 9 months

  6. RBC erythrocrine dysfunction (nitric oxide) presentation across stroke subtypes

    Comparison of nitric oxide estimation (chemiluminescence) across stroke subtypes

    Time frame: 9 months

  7. RBC erythrocrine dysfunction (NOS3) in relation to infarct size/stroke severity

    Level of RBC Nitric Oxide Synthestase 3 activation (flowcytometry)

    Time frame: 9 months

  8. RBC erythrocrine dysfunction (nitric) in relation to infarct size/stroke severity

    Level of nitric oxide estimation (chemiluminescence)

    Time frame: 9 months

  9. Difference in 7 days cognitive impairment between treatment groups

    Difference between baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score and day 7 MoCA score. MoCA is a 1-page (healthcare administered), 0-30-point test (30 is the best score), administrable in ≈10 minutes. The test evaluates different domains: visuospatial abilities, executive functions, short-term memory recall, attention, concentration, working memory, language, and orientation to time and space.

    Time frame: 1 week

  10. RBC erythrocrine dysfunction and deformability as a marker for difference in 7 days cognitive impairment (MoCA scale)

    Cognitive impairment is measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale (MoCA), which is a 1-page (healthcare administered), 0-30-point test (30 is the best score), administrable in ≈10 minutes. The test evaluates different domains: visuospatial abilities, executive functions, short-term memory recall, attention, concentration, working memory, language, and orientation to time and space

    Time frame: 9 months

  11. Circulating microRNA profile of RIC-induced neuroprotection

    MicroRNAs will be identified with Illumina next-generation sequencing using the TruSeq Small RNA Sample Preparation kit. The output will be miRNA expression levels for each sample, which will form the basis for a miRNA differential analysis where miRNAs with statistically significant expression changes will be found

    Time frame: 9 months

  12. Extracellular vesicle profile of RIC-induced neuroprotection

    Extracellular vesicles (EVs, also known as exosomes) will be isolated from plasma samples before characterization of surface markers and content. Protein characterization will be done using ELISA and Western blots in addition to array techniques. To broaden the feasibility of finding stroke type specific EV surface markers, we will utilize recombinant antibody library techniques to find novel disease binders with the potential of diagnosing stroke types in blood samples. Nucleic acid (DNA and RNA including miRNA) content of EVs will be analyzed using next generation sequencing (NGS) and qRT-PCR

    Time frame: 9 months

  13. Circulating microRNA as a marker for difference in 7 days cognitive impairment (MoCA score)

    Cognitive impairment is measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale (MoCA), which is a 1-page (healthcare administered), 0-30-point test (30 is the best score), administrable in ≈10 minutes. The test evaluates different domains: visuospatial abilities, executive functions, short-term memory recall, attention, concentration, working memory, language, and orientation to time and space

    Time frame: 9 months

  14. Extracellular vesicle profile as a marker for RBC erythrocrine dysfunction and deformability

    Extracellular vesicles (EVs, also known as exosomes) will be isolated from plasma samples before characterization of surface markers and content. To broaden the feasibility of finding stroke type specific EV surface markers, we will utilize recombinant antibody library techniques to find novel disease binders with the potential of diagnosing stroke types in blood samples.

    Time frame: 9 months

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Aarhus University Hospital
    Aarhus, 8200, Denmark
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2020 to primary completion in Jul 2021, 12 months.

Of 572 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Ischemic Stroke, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48. This study's 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 653 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 3, 2020
First posted
Feb 12, 2020
StartActual
Jul 29, 2020
Primary completionActual
Jul 31, 2021
CompletionActual
Jul 31, 2021
Last update
Feb 17, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 17, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04266639
Lead sponsor
Grethe Andersen
Responsible party
Grethe Andersen (Professor, DMSc, Senior Consultant, MD, Aarhus University Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 12, 2020
Start date
Jul 29, 2020
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2021
Completion
Jul 31, 2021
Last update
Feb 17, 2022

Study contacts

Grethe Andersen, MD, DMSc
principal investigator · Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Neurology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion