CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT04263337Updated Apr 22, 2026

NFL LONG Prospective Study

A Phase 1 interventional study of [11C] PiB and [18F] PBR111 in Concussion, Brain, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Active, not recruiting at 3 sites in United States. Open to male participants aged 50 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-22.

Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Phase 1, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
50 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The purpose of this 5-year prospective research study is to characterize the association between concussions, sub-concussive exposure, and long-term neurologic health outcomes in former NFL players. To achieve the study aims, the investigators will conduct detailed research visits that include clinical outcome assessments, blood-based biomarkers, advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) using investigational tracers and genetic testing. Ultimately, the goal of this study is to translate the findings from this study into clinical, interventional studies for at risk former NFL players.

Read the detailed description

There is growing concern that repetitive concussions, or even exposure to sub-concussive blows during collision sports, may be associated with chronic neurologic problems, including CTE. Despite the lay media attributing devastating clinical problems to CTE, no studies conclusively demonstrate a connection between the pathological findings and clinical effects. Experts at the 5th International Conference on Concussion concluded that "a cause-and-effect relationship has not yet been demonstrated between CTE and SRCs [sport-related concussions]" and "the notion that repeated concussion or sub-concussive impacts cause CTE remains unknown." As there are no treatments or prevention strategies available for CTE, some former players who attribute their problems to CTE develop depression, despair, and suicidality. There is a pressing need to understand the risk, incidence, character, progression, and treatment of the neurologic health problems of former NFL players.

The investigators propose an in-depth study assessing the association between concussion, sub-concussive exposure, cerebral tau, and clinical outcomes; assessing former NFL players for autoantibodies to cis-tau; assessing carbon monoxide (CO), memantine, environmental enrichment (EE), and cis P-tau antibodies for preventing and treating neurologic sequela of rmTBI. The most promising treatment(s) from preclinical studies will ultimately be translated into clinical trials for individuals identified during the clinical study who are at risk for long-term neurologic health problems. The study will be carried out at 2 sites, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and The Medical College of Wisconsin both at the oversight of the main grant awardee, Boston Children's Hospital.

In order to prospectively and longitudinally track progression of neurologic health and assess associations with concussion and sub-concussive exposure the investigators plan to execute multiple study phases: (1) Former National Football League (NFL) Players will complete the General Health Survey (GHS)(part of a previous research study); (2) Stratification based on age and the GHS; (3) Phone Screening with Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT); (4) Re-stratification based on BTACT scores; (5) In-Person Neurobiopsychosocial Research Evaluation 1; (6) Annual Follow-Up Health Surveys; and (7) In-Person Neurobiopsychosocial Research Evaluation 2.

Based on the stratification above, 250 subjects will be enrolled for In-Person Research Evaluation 1. This cohort will include 100 high cognitive functioning former NFL players, 100 low cognitive functioning former NFL players, and a group of 50 demographically matched healthy controls. Informants of the former NFL subjects, that are selected for In-Person Research Evaluation 1, will also be asked to complete a series of informant-based questionnaires (n=200). Subjects enrolled in the In-Person Research Evaluation 1 will complete an assessment of neurobiopsychosocial function, to include a detailed neuropsychological assessment, patient-reported outcomes, and symptom validity measures. Assessment of neurobiopsychosocial function will also include proteomic and genomic studies, multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and position emission tomography (PET) molecular imaging studies of tau, amyloid and inflammation.

Annual follow-up surveys of health status and life function (selected repeat measures from the GHS) will be sent/administered annually for 5 years. Based upon the annual follow-up survey of health status and life function, a subset of former NFL players and all controls will return for second a research assessment of neurobiopsychosocial function that mirrors the in-person research evaluation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Concussion, Brain

Keywords

  • Concussion
  • Former NFL Players
  • Football
  • Neurologic
  • Sub-concussive Exposure
03

In context

Brain Concussion

530 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Concussion; 151 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 250 is above the median of 64 across 364 interventional studies indexed under Brain Concussion.

Browse Brain Concussion studies →

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,340 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 155 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria for Former NFL Player Group:

  • At least 1 year of participation in National Football League (NFL groups)
  • Retired from professional football
  • Ages between 50-70

Inclusion Criteria for Healthy Controls:

  • No prior exposure to football, collision sports, or prior concussions
  • They will be matched to former NFL players by age and estimated premorbid intellectual functioning.
  • Ages between 50-70

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any contraindications to MRI, PET, or biological study procedures
  • History of Moderate or Severe TBI
  • Current primary Axis I diagnosis of Psychotic Disorder
  • History or clinical suspicion of other conditions (e.g., epilepsy, stroke, dementia) known to cause cognitive dysfunction
  • Diagnosis /associated treatment that would preclude participation in full study protocol (e.g., terminal cancer)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Low Cognitive Functioning/Low Concussion History

    Former NFL players with low cognitive function and low concussion history will be included in this group.

    Drug: [11C] PiB · Drug: [18F] PBR111 · Drug: [18F] Flortaucipir

  • Other
    High Cognitive Functioning/ High Concussion History

    Former NFL players with high cognitive function and high concussion history will be included in this group.

    Drug: [11C] PiB · Drug: [18F] PBR111 · Drug: [18F] Flortaucipir

  • Other
    Low Cognitive Functioning/High Concussion History

    Former NFL players with low cognitive function and high concussion history will be included in this group.

    Drug: [11C] PiB · Drug: [18F] PBR111 · Drug: [18F] Flortaucipir

  • Other
    High Cognitive Functioning/Low Concussion History

    Former NFL players with high cognitive function and low concussion history will be included in this group.

    Drug: [11C] PiB · Drug: [18F] PBR111 · Drug: [18F] Flortaucipir

  • Other
    Healthy Male Controls

    Healthy male demographically matched controls will be included in this group.

    Drug: [11C] PiB · Drug: [18F] PBR111 · Drug: [18F] Flortaucipir

  • Other
    Low Cognitive Functioning/Medium Concussion History

    Former NFL players with low cognitive function and medium concussion history will be included in this group.

    Drug: [11C] PiB · Drug: [18F] PBR111 · Drug: [18F] Flortaucipir

  • Other
    Medium Cognitive Functioning/Low Concussion History

    Former NFL Players with medium cognitive functioning and low concussion history with be included in this group.

    Drug: [11C] PiB · Drug: [18F] PBR111 · Drug: [18F] Flortaucipir

  • Other
    Medium Cognitive Functioning/Medium Concussion History

    Former NFL Players with medium cognitive functioning and medium concussion history with be included in this group.

    Drug: [11C] PiB · Drug: [18F] PBR111 · Drug: [18F] Flortaucipir

  • Other
    Medium Cognitive Functioning/High Concussion History

    Former NFL Players with medium cognitive functioning and high concussion history with be included in this group.

    Drug: [11C] PiB · Drug: [18F] PBR111 · Drug: [18F] Flortaucipir

  • Other
    High Cognitive Functioning/Medium Concussion History

    Former NFL Players with high cognitive functioning and high concussion history with be included in this group.

    Drug: [11C] PiB · Drug: [18F] PBR111 · Drug: [18F] Flortaucipir

Interventions

  • Drug[11C] PiB

    Per study protocol static PET images will be acquired after IV infusion of CPiB to generate standard uptake values (SUVs). PET imaging is necessary in order to address the primary and secondary outcome measures as a component of neurological health (i.e., presence of proteinopathies empirically associated with neurodegenerative disease, cognitive decline, and neurological signs/symptoms). All groups will participate in this portion of the protocol.

    Also known as: C11 PiB Amyloid

  • Drug[18F] PBR111

    Per study protocol static PET images will be acquired after IV infusion of F-PBR111 to generate standard uptake values (SUVs). PET imaging is necessary in order to address the primary and secondary outcome measures as a component of neurological health (i.e., presence of proteinopathies empirically associated with neurodegenerative disease, cognitive decline, and neurological signs/symptoms). All groups will participate in this portion of the protocol.

    Also known as: F18 PBR-111

  • Drug[18F] Flortaucipir

    Per study protocol static PET images will be acquired after IV infusion of F-T807 to generate standard uptake values (SUVs). PET imaging is necessary in order to address the primary and secondary outcome measures as a component of neurological health (i.e., presence of proteinopathies empirically associated with neurodegenerative disease, cognitive decline, and neurological signs/symptoms). All groups will participate in this portion of the protocol.

    Also known as: F18 T807 Tau

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PET Neuroimaging SUVR Over Time

    Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan- Standard uptake value ratio (SUVR) of the following tracers: Tau tracer, \[18 F\]Flortaucipir; AV1415 Amyloid tracer, Pittsburgh compound-B (11C-PiB); Neuroinflammation tracer, \[18 F\] peripheral benzodiazepine receptor (PBR111)

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  2. MRI Neuroimaging Over Time

    Advanced MRI Sequence Structural imaging (T1, T2, T2-FLAIR) Tissue/microstructural organization-Diffusion MRI Cerebral blood flow-Arterial Spin Labeling Susceptibility weighted imaging/quantitative susceptibility mapping Functional MRI- resting state functional MRI

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  3. Serum Biomarkers Over Time

    Blood collection for analysis of serum markers of neurodegenerative disease and neurodegeneration

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  4. Mean Change in Headache Impact Test (HIT-6)

    The HIT-6 is a screening measure that assesses the degree to which individual's experiences of headaches impacts their ability to perform daily functional roles. The six-items can be responded to in five ways, which include, never (6-points), rarely (8-points), sometimes (10-points), very often (11-points), and always (13-points).

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  5. Mean Change in MDS-UPDRS Score

    The MDS-UPDRS evaluates motor and non-motor symptoms in persons with Parkinson's and consists of 4 parts with various questions and evaluations. Parts I and II (non-motor) each contain 13 questions/evaluations, Part III (motor) contains 33 and Part IV (motor) contains 6. Each question/evaluation score ranges from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher scores indicate a greater impact of Parkinson's disease symptoms (i.e., worse symptoms).

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  6. Mean Change in Postural Stability-Sensory Organization Test

    The stability-sensory organization test is an index obtained by the NeuroCom Balance System. The minimum score is 0 and there is no specified maximum value. A lower score indicates better postural stability. Postural stability is measured utilizing a dynamic force plate to quantify the vertical forces exerted through the patient's feet to measure center of gravity position and postural control.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  7. Mean Change in Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS)

    A 75 true-or-false item measures that assesses malingering psychopathology and neuropsychological symptoms. The measure provides an overall score for probably malingering, as well as five subscales; including Psychosis, Low Intelligence, Neurologic Impairment, Affective Disorders, and Amnestic Disorders Endorsement of highly atypical symptoms and endorsement pattern profiles, this measure has demonstrated efficacy in differentiating malingerers from true clinical populations.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  8. Mean Change in Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT)

    The MSVT is measure typically used in the detection of suboptimal effort. The test consists of a process in which participants are asked to learn 10 word pairs and later recall the word pairs. The minimum score is 0% and the maximum value is 100%.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  9. Mean Change in National Institute of Health (NIH) Toolbox

    A computerized measure of cognitive functioning across several domains of cognition developed by the NIH. The Toolbox Cognition measure is comprised of several subtests assessing various domains of cognitive functioning. The minimum score is 0 and there is no maximum score.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  10. Mean Change in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)

    The RAVLT is a measure of auditory verbal learning, which is commonly affected among individuals with memory and other related cognitive disorders. Subjects are asked the learn and immediately recall a 15-word list across 5 different trials. They are asked to do the same for second, intrusion list, and then they are asked to recall the first list immediately after. Following a 30 minute delay, participants are asked to spontaneously recall the word list. Immediately following the delay recall trial, recognition memory is tested in a yes/no format where subjects are asked to discriminate words from the original list from novel distractors. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 15.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  11. Mean Change in Dot Counting Test

    The Dot Counting Test is a measure effort and validity of session results. Within the measure, subjects are essentially asked to count the number of dots on various stimuli pages. Each specific page has a maximum ranging from 7-28 and the minimum score is 0.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  12. Mean Change in Delis Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Verbal Fluency, Trailmaking Test (TMT), and Color-Word Interference

    The DKEFS is a measure that is associated with integrity and functioning of the frontal system of the brain, or executive functioning. Verbal fluency involves administration of 3 trials in which participants generate words based on letter prompts. The minimum score is 0 and there is no maximum. Two additional trials involving generation of word lists based on categories is also included. The DKEFS TMT is a test of speeded sequencing and set-shifting with sensitivity to sport-related concussion. There are 4 trials consisting of psychomotor speed, number sequencing, letter sequencing, and letter-number sequencing/shifting. The minimum is 0 and there is no maximum. DKEFS Color-Word consists of 4 trials in which participants are timed on (1) colors on the page, (2) read words on the page, (3) inhibit responses of words and state colors that items are printed in, and (4) set-shift in their ability to perform number 3 based on different principles. The minimum is 0 and there is no maximum.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  13. Mean Change in Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) Score

    Satisfaction with Life Scale is a short 5-item instrument designed to measure global cognitive judgments of satisfaction with one's life. Questions are responded to on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Total scores can be classified at extremely satisfied (31-35), satisfied (26-30), slightly satisfied (21-25), neutral (20), slightly dissatisfied (15-19), dissatisfied (10-14), and extremely dissatisfied (5-9).

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  14. Mean Change in Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score

    Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test consists of three domains: Hazardous alcohol use (items 1-3), dependence symptoms (items 4-6), and harmful alcohol use (items 7-10). Participants respond to items on a scale between 0 to 4, and a total score can be calculated based on individual items.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  15. Mean Change in PROMIS Cognitive Functioning Score

    The PROMIS Cognitive Function is a self-reported measure that assesses patient-perceived cognitive deficits and the extent to which cognitive impairments interfere with daily functioning. The short-form consists of 4-itens that are scored on a 5-point Likert scale (5-never) to 1 (very often). Raw scores are converted into T-score for each participant. A T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  16. Mean Change in WAIS-IV Coding and Symbol Search

    The Coding and Symbol Search subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) are two subtests that make up the Processing Speed Index of the WAIS-IV. Each subtest requires two minutes to complete and ultimately, reflect the participants ability to complete as many items correctly as possible within the time limit. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum is 60 for Symbol Search and 135 for Coding.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  17. Mean Change in Neuro-Quality Of Life (QOL): Emotional and Behavioral Dyscontrol

    This is an eight-item measure from the Neuro-QOL set of tools, which assesses various symptoms and behaviors associated with frontal lobe dysfunction, particularly as it relates to disinhibited actions or behaviors. Items are scored on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). A T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  18. Mean Change in Frontal systems behavior scale (FrsBe)

    The FrSBe is a 46-item self-report measure of various symptoms and behaviors commonly associated with executive dysfunction. On a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, participants endorse the degree to which they experience the symptom/behavior before and after the present illness/injury. A total frontal systems score can be calculated for before and after the injury/illness, as well as three subscales of frontal lobe symptoms or behaviors, including apathy, disinhibition, and executive dysfunction. Raw scores are converted into T-score for each participant. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  19. Mean Change in Everyday Cognition assessment (ECog)

    This measure is intended to be used as a measure of behaviors typically associated with forgetfulness and other cognitive difficulties. This will aid in identifying neurological health difficulties (i.e., cognitive decline) among those individuals who have limited insight on self-report cognitive functioning measures. The ECog Assessment is comprised of 12-items that are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (better or no change compared to 10 years earlier) to 4 (consistently much worse). Total scores from the measure are calculated by summing responses on all items and dividing by the number of questions answered.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  20. Mean Change in Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)-2-RF Cognitive Complaints Scale

    The cognitive complaints scale is a subscale of the derived from the full MMPI-2-RF. As part of the full instrument, the Cognitive Complaints Scale has been used as an embedded measure of symptom validity. In order to avoid administering the full over 500 item instrument, only the 13-itmes from the Cognitive Complaints Scale are administered in isolation for the current study. Items are presented in a true-false format. This method of administration has been performed in a number of studies in the published literature. A T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  21. Mean Change in PROMIS_29 Score

    A self-report 29-itme measure of overall functioning. Participants respond on a Likert scale ranging from 5 (without any difficulty) to 1 (unable to do). The measure generates an overall score of functioning, as well as subscales of physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, able to participate in social roles/activities, pain interference, and pain intensity. Raw scores are converted into T-score for each participant. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  22. Mean Change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) Score

    A 21-item measure inquiring about common symptoms of depression. Each item is measured on a scale from 0-3, with higher numbers reflecting a higher-degree of symptomology over the last 2 weeks for that item. Raw scores can be classified into severity categories, including normal (0-13), mild (14-19), moderate (20-28), and severe (29-63).

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  23. Mean Change in Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI-II)-Score

    A 21-item measure of common physiological and worry-related symptoms associated with anxiety. Responses are recorded on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (severely). Raw scores can be classified into severity categories, including minimal anxiety (0-7), mild anxiety (8-15), moderate (16-25), and severe (26-63).

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  24. Mean Change in Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire NPI-Q2 Score

    A measure of common dementia-related behavioral symptoms among older adults. Within the measure 12 domains of these symptoms are recorded, including delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, dysphoria, anxiety, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability/lability, and aberrant motor activity night-time behavioral disturbances and appetite, and eating abnormalities. A screening question is asked about each sub-domain. If the responses to these questions indicate that the patient has problems with a particular sub-domain of behavior, the caregiver is only then asked all the questions about that domain, rating the frequency of the symptoms on a 4-point scale, their severity on a 3-point scale, and the distress the symptom causes them on a 5-point scale.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  25. Mean Change in Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS) Score

    This 43-item measure quantifies stress associated with common life events (life changing unit), with a unique value associated with each event over a 12-month period. For example, death of a spouse garners a score of 100 and major holidays equals 11 points. The total number of points is summed and a higher score is representative of a greater degree of life-event related distress. A score of 150 life units or less suggests a 30% change of suffering from stress, 150-299 is associated with a 50% chance of suffering from stress, and over 300 life units suggests that the person has an 8% chance of developing a stress related illness.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  26. Mean Change in Ego Resilience Scale (ER89) Score

    This is a 14-item measure used to assess resilience in individuals following stressful events. Items are scored on a 4 point Likert Scale ranging from 1-Does not Apply at All, 2-Applies Slightly, 3-Applies Somewhat, and 4- Applies Very Strongly; and scores for each item are summed to obtain a total score. Higher scores indicate a more favorable outcome

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  27. Mean Change in Athlete Identity Questionnaire Score

    This questionnaire has been adapted from the previously established "Athletic Identity Measurement Scale" for currently active athletes (not retired). Items are scored on a 7 point Likert Scale ranging from 1-Strongly Disagree to 7-Strongly Agree.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  28. Mean Change in Childhood Development and Adversity Questions Score

    This is a 33-item questionnaire that was developed from previous work to give insight into childhood experiences, socioeconomic stability, and other important environmental factors that may influence later-life socioeconomic factors, health, and well-being. The questionnaire contains items pertaining to Social and Community Context (1 item), Economic Stability (4 items), Education Access and Quality (1 item), Health Care Access and Quality (2 items), Neighborhood and Built Environment (3 items), and Adverse Childhood Experiences (Emotional Neglect \[6 items\], Financial Need \[2 items\], Parental Intimidation \[4 items\], Parental Violence \[2 items\], and Family Problems and Separation \[4 items\]).

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  29. Mean Change in International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) Score

    This is a 4-item questionnaire intended to obtain data on health-related physical activity. It was developed for both research studies and patient monitoring. Each of the 4 items asks about the number of days per week, and the duration of time in each day participating in different physical activities: vigorous; moderate; walking; and sitting. Answers to these questions will be used to compare to activity recommendations put forth by organizations such as the American College of Sports Medicine.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

  30. Mean Change in Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants (REAPS) Score

    This is a 16-item questionnaire about the individuals' behaviors regarding food consumption. Participants respond to the first 13 items by selecting from the following options: "Usually/often"; "Sometimes"; "Rarely/Never"; or, when appropriate, a selection that the item does not apply to them. Responses from these first 13 items are then scored and summed into a diet quality score, where the total range of values falls between "13" (lowest quality diet) and "39" (highest quality diet). Items 14 and 15 request "Yes" or "No" responses: 14. "You or a member of your family usually shops and cooks rather than eating sit-down or take-out restaurant food?"; and 15. "Usually feel well enough to shop or cook." The 16th item is answered on a 5-point Likert scale from "1" (Very willing) to "5" (Not at all willing).

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 3 Year Follow-up

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Boston Children's Hospital
    Waltham, Massachusetts 02453, United States
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Randolph C, Karantzoulis S, Guskiewicz K. Prevalence and characterization of mild cognitive impairment in retired national football league players. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2013 Sep;19(8):873-80. doi: 10.1017/S1355617713000805. Epub 2013 Aug 1. PubMed 23902607 ↗
  • Guskiewicz KM, Marshall SW, Bailes J, McCrea M, Cantu RC, Randolph C, Jordan BD. Association between recurrent concussion and late-life cognitive impairment in retired professional football players. Neurosurgery. 2005 Oct;57(4):719-26; discussion 719-26. doi: 10.1093/neurosurgery/57.4.719. PubMed 16239884 ↗
  • Kerr ZY, Marshall SW, Harding HP Jr, Guskiewicz KM. Nine-year risk of depression diagnosis increases with increasing self-reported concussions in retired professional football players. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2206-12. doi: 10.1177/0363546512456193. Epub 2012 Aug 24. PubMed 22922518 ↗
  • Clark MD, Varangis EML, Champagne AA, Giovanello KS, Shi F, Kerr ZY, Smith JK, Guskiewicz KM. Effects of Career Duration, Concussion History, and Playing Position on White Matter Microstructure and Functional Neural Recruitment in Former College and Professional Football Athletes. Radiology. 2018 Mar;286(3):967-977. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170539. Epub 2017 Oct 31. PubMed 29087238 ↗
  • Meehan WP 3rd, Taylor AM, Berkner P, Sandstrom NJ, Peluso MW, Kurtz MM, Pascual-Leone A, Mannix R. Division III Collision Sports Are Not Associated with Neurobehavioral Quality of Life. J Neurotrauma. 2016 Jan 15;33(2):254-9. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.3930. Epub 2015 Jul 20. PubMed 26193380 ↗
  • Mannix R, Meehan WP 3rd, Pascual-Leone A. Sports-related concussions - media, science and policy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016 Aug;12(8):486-90. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.99. Epub 2016 Jul 1. PubMed 27364748 ↗
  • Carson A. Concussion, dementia and CTE: are we getting it very wrong? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;88(6):462-464. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-315510. Epub 2017 Apr 10. No abstract available. PubMed 28396360 ↗
  • Meehan W 3rd, Mannix R, Zafonte R, Pascual-Leone A. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy and athletes. Neurology. 2015 Oct 27;85(17):1504-11. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001893. Epub 2015 Aug 7. PubMed 26253448 ↗
  • Deshpande SK, Hasegawa RB, Rabinowitz AR, Whyte J, Roan CL, Tabatabaei A, Baiocchi M, Karlawish JH, Master CL, Small DS. Association of Playing High School Football With Cognition and Mental Health Later in Life. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Aug 1;74(8):909-918. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.1317. PubMed 28672325 ↗
  • Baugh CM, Kroshus E, Kiernan PT, Mendel D, Meehan WP 3rd. Football Players' Perceptions of Future Risk of Concussion and Concussion-Related Health Outcomes. J Neurotrauma. 2017 Feb 15;34(4):790-797. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4585. Epub 2016 Sep 16. PubMed 27526721 ↗
  • Zemlan FP, Jauch EC, Mulchahey JJ, Gabbita SP, Rosenberg WS, Speciale SG, Zuccarello M. C-tau biomarker of neuronal damage in severe brain injured patients: association with elevated intracranial pressure and clinical outcome. Brain Res. 2002 Aug 23;947(1):131-9. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(02)02920-7. PubMed 12144861 ↗
  • Van Essen DC, Smith SM, Barch DM, Behrens TE, Yacoub E, Ugurbil K; WU-Minn HCP Consortium. The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview. Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 15;80:62-79. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041. Epub 2013 May 16. PubMed 23684880 ↗
  • Smith SM, Beckmann CF, Andersson J, Auerbach EJ, Bijsterbosch J, Douaud G, Duff E, Feinberg DA, Griffanti L, Harms MP, Kelly M, Laumann T, Miller KL, Moeller S, Petersen S, Power J, Salimi-Khorshidi G, Snyder AZ, Vu AT, Woolrich MW, Xu J, Yacoub E, Ugurbil K, Van Essen DC, Glasser MF; WU-Minn HCP Consortium. Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 15;80:144-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.039. Epub 2013 May 20. PubMed 23702415 ↗
  • Glasser MF, Sotiropoulos SN, Wilson JA, Coalson TS, Fischl B, Andersson JL, Xu J, Jbabdi S, Webster M, Polimeni JR, Van Essen DC, Jenkinson M; WU-Minn HCP Consortium. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 15;80:105-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.127. Epub 2013 May 11. PubMed 23668970 ↗
  • Hampshire A, MacDonald A, Owen AM. Hypoconnectivity and hyperfrontality in retired American football players. Sci Rep. 2013 Oct 17;3:2972. doi: 10.1038/srep02972. PubMed 24135857 ↗
  • Kaushal M, Espana LY, Nencka AS, Wang Y, Nelson LD, McCrea MA, Meier TB. Resting-state functional connectivity after concussion is associated with clinical recovery. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Mar;40(4):1211-1220. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24440. Epub 2018 Nov 19. PubMed 30451340 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04263337
Lead sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Collaborators
Boston Children's Hospital, Medical College of Wisconsin, National Football League
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 10, 2020
Start date
Mar 12, 2020
Primary completion
Aug 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 22, 2026

Study contacts

William Meehan, MD
principal investigator · Boston Children's Hospital
Michael McCrea, PhD
principal investigator · Medical College of Wisconsin
Jason Mihalik, PhD
principal investigator · University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion