CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04258800ColoRelaxToneUpdated Mar 27, 2020

Impact of Music in Colonoscopy

An interventional study of Music during colonoscopy in Colonoscopy, Music and Pain, sponsored by University of Ulm. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-27.

Sponsored by University of Ulm · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study examines the impact of music during colonoscopy on sympathetic - autonomic nervous system, whose activity is operationalized by biopotentials signals. The music is chosen by the patients themselves.

The Null hypothesis: The comparison of the sympathetic - autonomic nervous system (operationalized by biopotentials) intensity between colonoscopy "with" vs. "without" music is not significant.

Alternative hypothesis: The comparison of the sympathetic - autonomic nervous system intensity is significantly higher in colonoscopy "without" music vs. "with" music.

Read the detailed description

In the field of endoscopy, stress and pain play a relevant role before and during the examination. A variety of methods have been evaluated to date to provide the patient with relaxation/distraction during the examination. Especially the use of relaxation music. However, the previous studies refer to a subjective assessment of the participants after the examination. Here at least one potential bias is to be assumed from the post-procedural euphoria through the use of propofol and/or midazolam. Pain reactions express themselves explicitly in autonomous function. In contrast to our previous work, the present study uses biopotential signals for the objective operationalization of stress reduction.

The activity of the sympathetic - autonomic nervous system is operationalized by biopotentials fixed to the body surface:

  • in the face area (corrugator, zygomaticus)
  • on the hand (skin conductance, temperature)
  • on the torso (electrocardiogram) The satisfaction of the patient and endoscopist with endoscopical procedure were asked using questionnaires.
02

Conditions studied

  • Colonoscopy
  • Music
  • Pain

Keywords

  • colonoscopy
  • music
  • relaxation
  • satisfaction
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Ulm is the lead sponsor of 141 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Indication for colonoscopy
  • conscious sedation with propofol
  • ASA state 1 or 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lack of written informed consent
  • pregnancy
  • General anaesthetics
  • ASA state >2
  • deafness, Hearing impairment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
300 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    With music

    Colonoscopy performed with music

    Device: Music during colonoscopy

  • No intervention
    Without music

    Colonoscopy performed without music

Interventions

  • DeviceMusic during colonoscopy

    Music during colonoscopy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Impact of Music on EMG (M. Zygomaticus, M. Corrugator)

    Evaluation of biopotential signals for the objective operationalization of stress reduction

    Time frame: During colonoscopy procedure

  2. Impact of Music on EKG (heart rate, heart rate variability)

    Evaluation of biopotential signals for the objective operationalization of stress reduction

    Time frame: During colonoscopy procedure

  3. Impact of Music on skin conductance in micro Siemens

    Evaluation of biopotential signals for the objective operationalization of stress reduction

    Time frame: During colonoscopy procedure

  4. Impact of Music on skin temperature in degrees Celsius

    Evaluation of biopotential signals for the objective operationalization of stress reduction

    Time frame: During colonoscopy procedure

  5. Impact of Music on Propofol Dosis in millilitres

    Evaluation of sedation requirements for the objective operationalization of stress reduction

    Time frame: During colonoscopy procedure

  6. Impact of Music on procedure time in minutes

    Evaluation of examination time for the objective operationalization of stress reduction

    Time frame: During colonoscopy procedure

  7. Patient satisfaction with endoscopical procedure by means of questionnaire

    Satisfaction of the patient with endoscopical procedure rated on a scale from 1 to 4 (1 means best rating, 7 means worst rating)

    Time frame: Approximately 45 minutes after colonoscopy was finished

  8. Patient satisfaction with sedation by means of questionnaire

    Satisfaction of the patient with sedation rated on a scale from 1 to 7 (1 means best rating, 7 means worst rating)

    Time frame: Approximately 45 minutes after colonoscopy was finished

  9. Endoscopist satisfaction by means of questionnaire

    Satisfaction of the endoscopist with endoscopical procedure rated on a scale from 1 to 7 (1 means best rating, 7 means worst rating)

    Time frame: immediately after colonoscopy was finished

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Universitätsklinikum Ulm
    Ulm, Germany
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 27, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04258800
Lead sponsor
University of Ulm
Collaborators
University Hospital Ulm
Responsible party
Thomas Seufferlein (Professor, Head of Department, University of Ulm) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 6, 2020
Start date
Nov 12, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2020
Completion
Mar 26, 2020
Last update
Mar 27, 2020

Study contacts

Benjamin Walter, MD
principal investigator · University Hospital Ulm

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion