ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04244240Drépa-COGUpdated Mar 7, 2025

Links Between Cognitive Functions and Clinical, Biological and Neuroradiological Outcomes in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease.

An observational study in Sickle Cell Disease and Drepanocytosis, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-07.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
19
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited blood disorder. Symptoms include acute and chronic complications. Due to progress in SCD care, patients with SCD are living longer than before and we focus more attention in chronic complications.

Children with SCD experience worse cognitive functions than healthy children, and fewer is known about cognitive functions in adults. Studies suggest lower cognitive performance in SCD, mostly in executive functions and processing speed, but the biological and anatomical substrates of cognitive decline are not yet well established in SCD. Often times, cognitive impairments and cerebral disorders are not diagnosed and treated in adults with SCD.

The main objective of this study is to propose a deep neuropsychological assessment in adults with SCD and cognitive complaints and to highlight links between cognitive functions and clinical, biological and neuroradiological markers. The hypothesis of this study is that cognitive functions are associated with severity of the SCD, with bood abnormalities, with MRI markers and Transcranial Doppler (TCD) markers of cerebrovascular disease. The secondary objective of this study is to validate a brief cognitive assessment tool (BEARNI tool) in adults with SCD.

This study is an observational cross-sectional study that will enroll adults with SCD and cognitive complaint.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sickle Cell Disease
  • Drepanocytosis

Keywords

  • Sickle Cell Disease
  • Drepanocytosis
03

In context

Anemia, Sickle Cell

1,134 studies on the registry are indexed under Anemia, Sickle Cell; 238 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 19 is below the median of 100 across 296 observational studies indexed under Anemia, Sickle Cell.

Browse Anemia, Sickle Cell studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,866 studies on the registry; 448 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adults with sickle cell disease and cognitive complaint

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Sickle cell anemia (homozygous SS or heterozygous SC, Sβ0, S/C, Sβ+)
  • In steady state (without vaso-occlusive crisis or acute chest syndrome at the time of measurements)
  • Presence of spontaneous cognitive complaint or requested by the physician.
  • Good command of the French language (native language or not)
  • No objection to participate in the study
  • Affiliated patient or beneficiary of social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient not compliant in the management of his disease
  • Patient participating in another interventional research protocol that may interfere with this protocol (according to investigator's judgment)
  • Language barrier
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • MRI
  • Patient under guardianship , curatorship or justice
  • Inability to express non-opposition
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
19 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Sickle cell disease patient

    Adults with sickle cell disease (homozygous SS or heterozygous SC, Sβ0 or Sβ+) with cognitive complaint.

    Behavioral: BEARNI Tool

Interventions

  • BehavioralBEARNI Tool

    BEARNI is brief screening tool initially validated for Alcohol-related neuropsychological impairments (Ritz et al., 2015). BEARNI tool detect impairment in visuospatial abilities, executive functions, verbal episodic memory, and verbal working memory. The score of the test could be expressed as a global score, and also as subscores corresponding to each cognitive subtest. Normative data are available.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. BEARNI questionnaire

    Cognitive performance will be evaluated by a large neuropsychological assessment. The cognitive score will be interpreted as raw scores, z-score adjusted for level of education, age, and sex, according to the tests and binarized into two categories (normal versus pathological performances)

    Time frame: Day 0

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hôpital Edouard Herriot
    Bron, 69437, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2020 to primary completion in Apr 2024, 41 months.

Of 130 non-industry observational studies under Anemia, Sickle Cell, half reached primary completion within 48 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 109. This study's 41 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 139 studies reached it within 49 months; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 109.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 23, 2020
First posted
Jan 28, 2020
StartActual
Oct 13, 2020
Primary completionActual
Apr 5, 2024
CompletionActual
Apr 5, 2024
Last update
Mar 7, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 7, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04244240
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 28, 2020
Start date
Oct 13, 2020
Primary completion
Apr 5, 2024
Completion
Apr 5, 2024
Last update
Mar 7, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion