ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT04242823Updated Apr 27, 2026

Primary HPV-based Cervical Cancer Screening Algorithms in Botswana

An interventional study of 8-type HPV genotype restriction in Cervical Cancer and Prevention, sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Botswana. Open to female participants aged 25 Years to 100 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-27.

Sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3,000
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
25 Years to 100 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Primary high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing has become first line screening for cervical cancer in high-income countries. The feasibility of this approach in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is less clear, as is the role of HPV testing among women living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The proposed study seeks to evaluate the accuracy of cervical cancer screening algorithms using primary HPV testing followed by various forms of visual evaluation, including visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), colposcopy and HPV genotype restriction for the detection of high-grade cervical dysplasia, using histology as the gold standard. We will validate the AmpFire Assay for HPV self-sampling in our setting. We will evaluate optimal screening intervals in women living with HIV (WLHIV) in an HPV-based cervical cancer screening program and compare triage strategies for positive HPV results at WHO recommended screening intervals for WLHIV. We also seek to understand in-depth the attitudes, acceptability and preferences regarding cervical cancer screening, HPV testing, and self-sampling, for women in Botswana through interviews of a sub-set of women recruited for the cervical cancer screening study. Finally, we will analyze the cost of two-stage cervical cancer screening algorithms using high-risk HPV testing in Botswana.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Cancer
  • Prevention
03

In context

Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

2,366 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; 677 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 3,000 is above the median of 100 across 1,738 interventional studies indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms.

Browse Uterine Cervical Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 568 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Of its 76 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 62 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Cis-gender female or transgender male (must have a cervix)
  2. ≥25 years of age
  3. Competent to understand study procedures and give .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently pregnant (as diagnostic procedures for cervical cancer are often deferred during pregnancy)
  2. Previous hysterectomy
  3. Previous diagnosis of cervical cancer
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
3,000 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Baseline screening cohort

    This group undergoes HPV testing using self-collected swabs. Triage evaluation occurs in all women who test HPV positive which includes visual inspection with acetic acid and colposcopy. The WLHIV in the cohort who test HPV positive at baseline but who have concurrent benign histopathology results will be invited back for re-screening at a 2-year interval, and undergo similar HPV testing and triage procedures. The WLHIV in the cohort who test HPV negative at baseline will be invited back for re-screening at a 3-year interval and undergo similar HPV testing and triage procedures.

    Diagnostic Test: 8-type HPV genotype restriction

Interventions

  • Diagnostic test8-type HPV genotype restriction

    Participants will undergo primary hrHPV testing and if positive will be referred for VIA per Botswana and WHO guidelines. Participants will also undergo colposcopy and biopsy at the time of VIA. The performance of triage with 8-type HPV genotype restriction will be evaluated.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Compare the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of triage of primary human papillomavirus testing with 8-type HPV genotype restriction to visual inspection with acetic acid and colposcopy

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. Determine the persistence of HPV infection in WLHIV at the pre-specified follow-up interval

    Time frame: 5 years

  3. Determine the clearance of HPV infection in WLHIV at the pre-specified follow-up interval

    Time frame: 5 years

  4. Determine the incidence of HPV infection in WLHIV at the pre-specified follow-up interval

    Time frame: 5 years

  5. Quantify the incidence of cervical intraepithelial lesion grade 2 or worse in women living with HIV who were baseline HPV positive but with benign pathology at 2 year interval screening

    Time frame: 5 years

  6. Quantify the incidence of cervical intraepithelial lesion grade 2 or worse in women living with HIV who were baseline HPV negative at 3 year interval screening

    Time frame: 5 years

  7. Analyze the cost of two-stage cervical cancer screening algorithms using high-risk HPV testing in Botswana.

    Time frame: 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Understand in-depth the attitudes, acceptability and preferences regarding cervical cancer screening, HPV testing, and self-sampling, for women in Botswana through interviews of a sub-set of women recruited for the cervical cancer screening study.

    Time frame: 6 years

  2. Evaluate the performance of a novel HPV assay as a stand-alone screening tool in our high-prevalence HIV population

    Time frame: 3 years

  3. Evaluate the impact of patient demographic and clinical factors, such as number of sexual partners, smoking, HIV status and related HIV immune markers, on risk of cervical dysplasia

    Time frame: 5 years

  4. Evaluate the impact of patient characteristics and and risk factors on the incidence of cervical dysplasia

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Bamalete Lutheran Hospital
    Ramotswa, Botswana
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Luckett R, Zhang BX, Gompers A, George J, Modest A, Bazzett-Matabele L, Vuylsteke P, Kula M, Monare B, Botha MH, Shapiro RL, Ramogola-Masire D, Grover S. High-grade cervical disease and cervical cancer in women aged 50 years and older compared with younger women: examining prevalence by HIV status in two large prospective cohorts in Botswana. BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 29;14(10):e089375. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089375. PubMed 39477271 ↗
  • Luckett R, Ramogola-Masire D, Gompers A, Moraka N, Moyo S, Sedabadi L, Tawe L, Kashamba T, Gaborone K, Mathoma A, Noubary F, Kula M, Grover S, Dreyer G, Botha MH, Makhema J, Shapiro R, Hacker MR. Triage of HPV positivity in a high HIV prevalence setting: A prospective cohort study comparing visual triage methods and HPV genotype restriction in Botswana. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 May;165(2):507-518. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15225. Epub 2023 Nov 10. PubMed 37950533 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data will be made available upon reasonable request with appropriate data transfer agreements in place.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04242823
Collaborators
University of Botswana, Botswana Harvard AIDS Institute Partnership
Responsible party
Rebecca Luckett (Obstetrician Gynecologist, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 27, 2020
Start date
Feb 22, 2021
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2026
Completion
Feb 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 27, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion