CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04242069Updated Apr 2, 2025

Healthy for my Baby- RCT of a Lifestyle Intervention for Overweight Women in Preconception

An interventional study of Healthy for my Baby and Usual Care in Overweight and Obesity, Pregnancy Complications and Health Behavior, sponsored by Université de Sherbrooke. Recruiting at 2 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-02.

Sponsored by Université de Sherbrooke · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jun 2021; still recruiting 5 years 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
68
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether an intervention combining motivational interviewing and follow-up with a mobile phone application will help overweight women and their partners adopt healthy lifestyle habits in the preconception period. This study will also evaluate the impact of the intervention on the weight, waist circumference, and body fat of women and their partners. Women and their partners will be followed through pregnancy to explore the effects of the intervention on the adequacy of gestational weight gain, rates of pregnancy complications, delivery mode, and infant birth weight.

Read the detailed description

In Canada, overweight and obesity are major public health concerns that affect nearly 45% of reproductive-age women. In pregnancy, overweight and excessive gestational weight gain are important risk factors for complications including gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, fetal macrosomia, and cesarean delivery. Women who are overweight in pregnancy and who gain excessive weight are also predisposed to subsequent obesity, and their offspring are predisposed to childhood obesity and metabolic syndrome. In light of the failure of pregnancy lifestyle interventions to improve pregnancy outcomes for overweight and obese women, earlier intervention is mandated. Preconception appears as a key period to prevent overweight and pregnancy complications.

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the Healthy for my Baby intervention on the diet quality of women in the preconception period, as measured with the Canadian Healthy Eating Index 2007 (C-HEI). Urinary profiling of dietary exposure biomarkers will be used as a secondary assessment of diet quality. Secondary outcomes for preconception include the effect of the intervention on the lifestyle habits and anthropometric measures of women and their partners.

In pregnancy, the main secondary objective is to evaluate the impact of the intervention on the pattern of gestational weight gain as defined by the 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations. Other outcomes for pregnancy include the rates of gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, macrosomia, and cesarean delivery. The lifestyle habits of women and their partner and the anthropometric measures of their spouses will also be evaluated in pregnancy. Fertility outcomes will be reported as exploratory measures.

Eligible subjects are couples aged 18 to 40 years who wish to conceive within 12 months of trial inclusion, in which the female partner has a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. Exclusion criteria are insufficient knowledge of French or English, an anticipated move to another region, a personal history of infertility, type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus, prior bariatric surgery, an eating disorder established by clinical diagnosis, medical contraindication to pregnancy, medical contraindication to physical activity, participation in another intensive lifestyle intervention, or a known or anticipated disease or surgery likely to cause an important weight loss. Multiple pregnancies will be excluded from the pregnancy follow-up to limit aberrant data.

Couples will be randomized in blocks to the intervention or control group in a 1:1 ratio with randomly selected block size. The intervention will include two sessions of motivational interviewing on healthy lifestyle in preconception, and two more sessions in pregnancy. As an adjunct to in-person meetings, couples will have access to a mobile phone application to self-monitor daily lifestyle smart goals. Participants in the control group will receive standard advice on lifestyle as provided by their usual care provider. To improve compliance with the study follow-up, participants in this group will have access to a simplified version of the mobile application that contains a fertility calendar and a research visit calendar.

Research visits will take place at study inclusion and every 3 months in preconception for up to 6 months. In pregnancy, study visits will take place in the first (6-8 weeks), second (24-26 weeks), and third (32-34 weeks) trimesters. The C-HEI will be measured at 0, 2, 4, and 6 months in preconception and every trimester in pregnancy with two web-based 24-hour dietary recalls. Urine samples will be collected at 0 and 2 months in preconception and at 24-26 weeks in pregnancy. Data on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes will be collected from medical files at the end of the trial.

A sample size of 54 women is required to detect a 10-point difference in the C-HEI score (maximal value 100) between the groups with an alpha value of 5%, 80% power, and a 13 points standard deviation. Sixty-eight women and their partners will be recruited to account for a 20% attrition rate.

The evolution of the C-HEI score with time in the preconception period will be compared between groups using a mixed linear model. Student's t-test will also be used to compare the average HEI-score between groups at 3, and 6-month follow-up. A statistical significance of 5% with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons will be used for the preconception primary outcome assessment. The concentration of 40 urinary metabolites will be compared between baseline, 2 months in preconception and 24-26 weeks of pregnancy using repeated measures ANOVA or Friedman test with a Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons. The proportion of adequate gestational weight gain will be compared between groups with a Chi-squared test. Secondary outcomes will be assessed using Student's t-test, Wilcoxon test, Chi-squared test, or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. For all secondary outcomes statistical significance is set at 5%.

02

Conditions studied

  • Overweight and Obesity
  • Pregnancy Complications
  • Health Behavior
  • Life Style
  • Preconception Care

Keywords

  • Metabolomics
03

In context

Pregnancy Complications

437 studies on the registry are indexed under Pregnancy Complications; 119 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 68 is below the median of 147 across 220 interventional studies indexed under Pregnancy Complications.

Browse Pregnancy Complications studies →

Lead sponsor

Université de Sherbrooke is the lead sponsor of 289 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Women and their partner who wish to conceive within 12 months of trial inclusion
  • Woman's body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2
  • Access to a smart phone

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Insufficient knowledge of French or English
  • Anticipated move to another region
  • Personal history of infertility
  • Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Prior bariatric surgery
  • Active eating disorder established by clinical diagnosis
  • Medical contraindication to pregnancy
  • Medical contraindication to physical activity
  • Participation in another intensive lifestyle intervention
  • Known or anticipated disease or surgery likely to cause an important weight loss
  • Multiple pregnancies will be excluded from the pregnancy follow-up to limit aberrant data
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
68 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Healthy for my Baby Intervention

    Behavioral: Healthy for my Baby

  • Other
    Control

    Usual care

    Other: Usual Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralHealthy for my Baby

    Participants will start the preconception intervention by meeting with a health professional for a motivational interview session on healthy lifestyle habits. Following this interview, participants will have access to a mobile phone application that will allow them to track daily lifestyle modification goals. After a month, they will meet the health professional for a second motivational interview and review their progression. Participants will continue to make lifestyle changes through the preconception period by accomplishing smart goals followed daily in the mobile phone application. If the woman becomes pregnant, the couple will participate in two more in-person motivational interviews, a month apart. The mobile application will be put in pregnancy mode, and participants will adapt their daily lifestyle goals for the pregnancy. Participants will continue to make lifestyle changes throughout pregnancy by accomplishing smart goals followed daily in the mobile phone application.

  • OtherUsual Care

    Participants in the control group will receive standard advice on healthy lifestyle habits as provided by their usual care provider. They will receive standard medical care in preconception and pregnancy. To improve compliance with the study follow-up, participants in this group will have access to a simplified version of the mobile application that contains a fertility calendar and a research visit calendar. This version of the application does not include lifestyle goals or any information on healthy lifestyle habits.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Women's diet quality in preconception measured with the Canadian-Healthy Eating Index- 2007

    Women's C-HEI score will be measured with two or three online 24 hour dietary recalls (R24W tool) at each time point. Value range 0-100 with a higher score indicating better diet quality. The change of the score in time during the preconception period will be compared between the groups.

    Time frame: 0, 2, 4, and 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Women's Urinary Food exposure Biomarker Profile

    Three urine spot samples collected over a week will be pooled after normalizing using refractive index measurement to guide dilution. Around 40 metabolites will be targeted for the quantitative measurement of dietary intake biomarker concentrations.

    Time frame: 0 and 2 months in preconception, 24- 26 weeks in pregnancy.

  2. Men and Women's diet quality measured with the Canadian-Healthy Eating Index- 2007.

    The C-HEI score will be measured with two or three online 24 hour dietary recalls at each time point (R24W tool). Value range 0-100 with a higher score indicating better diet quality.

    Time frame: 0, 2, 4, and 6 months in preconception and 10-12 weeks, 24-26 weeks, and 32-34 weeks in pregnancy.

  3. Men and Women's physical activity level measured with the International Physical Activity Questionnaires Short Version.

    Physical activity measured in MET-minutes/week. Value range of 0-5000 MET-minutes/week with a higher score indicating a higher activity level.

    Time frame: 0, 3 and 6 months in preconception and 10-12 weeks, 24-26 weeks, and 32-34 weeks in pregnancy.

  4. Men and Women's steps per day measured with a Fitbit.

    Steps per day measured with a wristband accelerometer over 7 days . Value range 0- 15 000 steps per day with a higher step count indicating a higher activity level.

    Time frame: 0, 3 and 6 months in preconception and 10-12 weeks, 24-26 weeks, and 32-34 weeks in pregnancy.

  5. Men and Women's minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity measured with a Fitbit.

    Minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity per week measured with a wristband accelerometer over 7 days. Value range 0-800 minutes with a higher number of minutes indicating a higher activity level.

    Time frame: 0, 3 and 6 months in preconception and 10-12 weeks, 24-26 weeks, and 32-34 weeks in pregnancy.

  6. Men and Women's Sleep quality measured with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

    Sleep quality measured with a questionnaire. Value range 0-21 with a higher score indicating lower sleep quality.

    Time frame: 0, 3 and 6 months in preconception and 10-12 weeks, 24-26 weeks, and 32-34 weeks in pregnancy.

  7. Men and Women's quality of life measured with the SF-12 v2

    Quality of life measured with a questionnaire and reported as a t-score. Value range 0-100 with a higher score indicating better quality of life.

    Time frame: 0, 3 and 6 months in preconception and 10-12 weeks, 24-26 weeks, and 32-34 weeks in pregnancy.

  8. Men and Women's Anxiety and Depression symptoms measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

    Anxiety and Depression symptoms measured with a questionnaire. Value range 0-42 with a higher score indicating more anxiety and depression symptoms.

    Time frame: 0, 3 and 6 months in preconception and 10-12 weeks, 24-26 weeks, and 32-34 weeks in pregnancy.

  9. Women's body fat percentage.

    The change in body fat will be assessed in preconception using foot-to-foot bioimpedance.

    Time frame: 0, 3, and 6 months in preconception.

  10. Women's waist circumference in centimeters.

    The change in waist circumference will be assessed in preconception using a measuring tape and a standardized protocol.

    Time frame: 0, 3, and 6 months in preconception.

  11. Men and Women's weight in kilograms.

    The change in bodyweight will be assessed throughout the study using a calibrated scale.

    Time frame: 0, 3 and 6 months in preconception and 10-12 weeks, 24-26 weeks, and 32-34 weeks in pregnancy.

  12. Men's body fat percentage.

    The change in body fat will be assessed throughout the study using foot-to-foot bioimpedance.

    Time frame: 0, 3 and 6 months in preconception and 10-12 weeks, 24-26 weeks, and 32-34 weeks in pregnancy.

  13. Men's waist circumference in centimeters.

    The change in waist circumference will be assessed throughout the study using a measuring tape and a standardized protocol.

    Time frame: 0, 3 and 6 months in preconception and 10-12 weeks, 24-26 weeks, and 32-34 weeks in pregnancy.

  14. Proportion of adequate gestational weight gain

    Women's total weight gain in pregnancy will be obtained from their medical file. The proportion of adequate gestational weight gain according to BMI specific recommendations (IOM, 2009) will be compared between groups.

    Time frame: At delivery.

  15. Rate of pregnancy complications

    Rates of gestational diabetes (diagnosed with a provoked hyperglycemia test or serial capillary glycemia measures), gestational hypertension (clinical diagnosis), pre-eclampsia (clinical diagnosis), fetal macrosomia (birth weight over the 90th percentile for the gestational age and sex), and mode of delivery.

    Time frame: At delivery.

Other outcomes

  1. Fertility outcomes

    Rates of clinical pregnancies (embryo with a positive heartbeat on first trimester ultrasound), spontaneous miscarriage (unviable pregnancy prior to 20 weeks of gestation), and live birth rate.

    Time frame: After 9 months of follow-up.

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec Université Laval
    Québec, Quebec G1V 4G2, Canada
    • Anne-Sophie Plante, MSc · Contact · 418 525-4444
    Recruiting
  • Centre de recherche du CHUS
    Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5N4, Canada
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Government of Canada SC. Measured adult body mass index (BMI) (World Health Organization classification), by age group and sex, Canada and provinces, Canadian Community Health Survey - Nutrition [Internet]. 2017. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310079401
  • Marchi J, Berg M, Dencker A, Olander EK, Begley C. Risks associated with obesity in pregnancy, for the mother and baby: a systematic review of reviews. Obes Rev. 2015 Aug;16(8):621-38. doi: 10.1111/obr.12288. Epub 2015 May 28. PubMed 26016557 ↗
  • Battista MC, Hivert MF, Duval K, Baillargeon JP. Intergenerational cycle of obesity and diabetes: how can we reduce the burdens of these conditions on the health of future generations? Exp Diabetes Res. 2011;2011:596060. doi: 10.1155/2011/596060. Epub 2011 Oct 29. PubMed 22110473 ↗
  • International Weight Management in Pregnancy (i-WIP) Collaborative Group. Effect of diet and physical activity based interventions in pregnancy on gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes: meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. BMJ. 2017 Jul 19;358:j3119. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3119. PubMed 28724518 ↗
  • Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines; Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL, editors. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2009. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK32813/ PubMed 20669500 ↗
  • Garriguet D. Diet quality in Canada. Health Rep. 2009 Sep;20(3):41-52. PubMed 19813438 ↗
  • Hardy I, Lloyd A, Morisset AS, Camirand Lemyre F, Baillargeon JP, Fraser WD. Healthy for My Baby Research Protocol- a Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing a Preconception Intervention to Improve the Lifestyle of Overweight Women and Their Partners. Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 3;9:670304. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.670304. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34414154 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04242069
Lead sponsor
Université de Sherbrooke
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 27, 2020
Start date
Jun 18, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 2, 2025

Study contacts

Ana C Colmenares, MD
Contact
ensantepourbebe@usherbrooke.ca
1-819-674-3780
William D Fraser, MD,MSc
principal investigator · Researcher, Centre de recherche du CHUS

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion