ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04235322HEARTH-GENUpdated Oct 10, 2023

Study of 2LHERP® in Genital Herpes Infections

A Phase 4 interventional study of 2LHERP® and Placebo in Herpes Simplex, Genital, sponsored by Labo'Life. Terminated at 13 sites in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-10.

Sponsored by Labo'Life · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Labo'life decided to end prematurely HEARTH-GEN study from April 18th 2023 due to very low recruitment rates (6/100). Labo'life decided to focus all its efforts on another study using 2LHERP® in herpes treatment, called HEARTH-OF (NCT04065971)
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection is very common, as most people will experience herpetic infection during their lifetime. The most common manifestation of HSV infection is sores which may appear at any age. No specific antiviral therapy is available to totally cure herpetic infections and today, there is no treatment that allows the definitive eradication of the virus.

The 2LHERP® has been available for more than 20 years, and has received a marketing authorization in Belgium by the FAMHP. It is used as an immune regulator in the treatment of herpetic infections. Since 2LHERP® has been made available, clinical observational data collected on treated patients have shown the beneficial effect on the disappearance of herpetic recurrences.

The purpose of this placebo-controlled trial is to evaluate the efficacy of 2LHERP® on the treatment of herpetic infections in adults.

Read the detailed description

The study duration will be maximum 45 months with 33 months of inclusion and 12 months of follow-up. Patients aged between 18 and 80 years who present recurrent genital herpes infections (4 or more episodes within the 12-months' period prior to their study entry). The total number of patients to include will be 100 with 50 patients per group.

Primary objective:

Evaluation of the efficacy of 2LHERP® on the reduction of the number of recurrent genital herpes infections at 12 months compare to placebo.

Secondary objectives:

Comparison of the efficacy of 2LHERP® vs placebo, according to the following aspects:

  • number of episodes at 6 months,
  • remaining herpes infection recurrence free 6 and 12 months after the treatment initiation,
  • time to first episode during the treatment,
  • duration of episodes,
  • symptomatology during the entire relapse time,
  • use of Rescue Medication (RM),
  • evaluation of impact on the quality of life,
  • safety issues.

Treatment phase:

Group n°1 = 2LHERP® (6 months of treatment) Group n°2 = Placebo (6 months of treatment) Post-treatment follow-up phase: 6 months. Treatment will be considered successful if the number of herpetic episodes is reduced.

02

Conditions studied

  • Herpes Simplex, Genital

Browse trials for

03

In context

Herpes Genitalis

70 studies on the registry are indexed under Herpes Genitalis; 3 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 6 is below the median of 103 across 51 interventional studies indexed under Herpes Genitalis.

Browse Herpes Genitalis studies →

Lead sponsor

Labo'Life is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Man or woman aged 18-80 years,
  • Patient presenting 4 or more episodes of genital herpes infections during the preceding 12-months' period (prior to the study entry),
  • Woman of childbearing age under effective ,
  • Patient reporting a current stable sexual relationship (steady sexual partner during study duration),
  • Patient having faculties to understand and respect the constraints of the study,
  • Signature of the Form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman,
  • Patient under immunotherapy (including treatment) or micro-immunotherapy received during last previous 6 months,
  • Patient who had a suppressive antiviral therapy during last month,
  • Patient who wishes to continue his/her suppressive antiviral therapy,
  • Patient with known lactose intolerance,
  • Patient who participated in a clinical study in the previous 3-month period,
  • Patient who is not sufficiently motivated to engage in a follow-up period of 12 months, or likely to travel or to move before the end of the study,
  • Patient with severe immunodeficiency disease requiring long term treatment (*) or under chemotherapy or radiotherapy or corticoid therapy,
  • Patient under listed homeopathic or phytotherapy treatment,
  • Patient using or addicted to recreational drugs.

(*) important renal or respiratory insufficiency, transplanted or grafted patients, /AIDS, terminal cancer.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
6 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    2LHERP® arm

    2LHERP® treatment (6 months of treatment)

    Drug: 2LHERP®

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo arm

    Placebo treatment (6 months of treatment)

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Drug2LHERP®

    The treatment schema consists in taking the content of one capsule a day, 15-30 minutes before breakfast, on an empty stomach, sequentially, according to capsules' numerical order: 1 through 10. When capsule number 10 is taken, capsule 1 of the next blister should be taken on the next day to continue the treatment. The duration of treatment will be 6 months of continuous intake of the content of 1 capsule/day.

    Also known as: 2LHERP

  • DrugPlacebo

    The treatment schema consists in taking the content of one capsule a day, 15-30 minutes before breakfast, on an empty stomach, sequentially, according to capsules' numerical order: 1 through 10. When capsule number 10 is taken, capsule 1 of the next blister should be taken on the next day to continue the treatment. The duration of treatment will be 6 months of continuous intake of the content of 1 capsule/day.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of the efficacy of 2LHERP® on the reduction of the number of recurrent genital herpes infections at 12 months compare to placebo.

    Change from baseline within the number of episodes of genital herpes infection observed for 12 months, where the baseline value is the number of episodes experienced within the 12 months preceeding study enrolment.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of the efficacy of 2LHERP® versus placebo according to the number of episodes at 6 months.

    Number of episodes of herpes infections observed at month 6

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Comparison of the efficacy of 2LHERP® versus placebo according to - remaining herpes infection recurrence free 6 and 12 months after the treatment initiation

    Patient remaining herpes infection recurrence free 6 months and 12 months after the treatment initiation

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

  3. Comparison of the efficacy of 2LHERP® versus placebo according to the time to first episode during the treatment

    Time to first recurrence of herpes infection during the treatment

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Comparison of the efficacy of 2LHERP® versus placebo according to the duration of episodes

    Mean duration of episodes, the duration for a given episode being defined as the number of days between the start of the episode and the last day before all symptoms recorded as 'none' for 2 consecutive days, in the patient diary

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

  5. Comparison of the efficacy of 2LHERP® versus placebo according to the symptomatology during the entire relapse time

    Level of pain recorded daily on a visual analogue scale (100mm), as well as other associated symptomatology for genital (genital lesions/craks, difficulties to urinate, genital pruritus/burn, fever, QoL), which will be consequently measured as area under the curve (AUC)

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

  6. Comparison of the efficacy of 2LHERP® versus placebo according to the use of Rescue Medication

    Use of daily rescue medicine (RM), expressed with the cumulative number of days for the treatment period, the follow-up period and the entire study period

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

  7. Comparison of the efficacy of 2LHERP® versus placebo according to the evaluation of impact on the quality of life

    6-items questionnaire of quality of life

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

  8. Comparison of the efficacy of 2LHERP® versus placebo according to safety issues

    Adverse events (AEs) and severe adverse events (SAEs), considered as related or not to the study drug

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

13 sites
  • Private practice
    Lodelinsart, Charleroi 6042, Belgium
  • Polyclinique D'Andenne
    Andenne, 5300, Belgium
  • Dr MANOUACH Fatiha
    Bruxelles, 1000, Belgium
  • Dr VERHEVEN Cécile
    Bruxelles, 1050, Belgium
  • Private Practice
    Bruxelles, 1180, Belgium
  • CHU Charleroi - Hopital Marie Curie
    Charleroi, 6042, Belgium
  • Cabinet privé
    Gozée, 6534, Belgium
  • Centre Hospitalier Regional de Huy
    Huy, 4500, Belgium
  • Private Practice
    Libramont, 6800, Belgium
  • Vivalia - Centre Hospitalier de L'Ardenne - Libramont Chevigny
    Libramont, 6800, Belgium
  • Dr PETTEAU Myriam
    Nivelles, 1400, Belgium
  • Dr ROULEFF Denis
    Noirefontaine, 6831, Belgium
  • Private Practice
    Oisquercq, 1480, Belgium
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 10, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04235322
Lead sponsor
Labo'Life
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 21, 2020
Start date
Jan 25, 2021
Primary completion
Apr 18, 2023
Completion
Apr 18, 2023
Last update
Oct 10, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion