An observational study in Genital Herpes Simplex, Maternal Morbidity and Racial Disparities, sponsored by Kaiser Permanente. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-24.
Sponsored by Kaiser Permanente · Observational
Among 40 studies in Herpes Genitalis with a site in United States — 1 open to participants now, 2 under way, none of them phase 3. Herpes Genitalis · United States.
Among the 40 studies in Herpes Genitalis with a site in United States, this one is one of 3 that started in 2023, is one of 8 observational ones, and was the 37th registered.
70 studies on the registry are indexed under Herpes Genitalis; 3 are open to participants now.
Browse Herpes Genitalis studies →1 of the 40 studies in Herpes Genitalis with a site in United States is open now.
A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →
Of the 1 Herpes Genitalis studies recruiting now, 0 (0%) set no upper age limit and 1 (100%) stop at 75 or younger; 0 take children under 18; 0 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years to 55 Years · female · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
40 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
A study in two phases is counted once above. Listed by phase, each with its combined phases: Phase 1 7 · Phase 2 8 · Phase 3 3 · Phase 4 12
First in 1999; this study’s year is marked. 3 started in 2023.
This study's planned enrollment of 339,000 is above the median of 300 across 13 observational studies indexed under Herpes Genitalis.
Median enrollment 73 across the 27 interventional studies, 275 across the 8 observational. Of the 36 that completed or were terminated, 15 (42%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
28 of 40 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
Kaiser Permanente is the lead sponsor of 393 studies on the registry; 43 are open to participants now.
Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (43%) have results posted.
Kaiser Permanente has 1 study filed under Herpes Genitalis — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
None of the studies under way reaches primary completion within a year.
Among the 40 studies in Herpes Genitalis with a site in United States, from their registry updates:
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
Severe Maternal Morbidity (SMM) has been associated with maternal mortality, fetal risk, and long-term maternal risk. African American (AA) women are at consistently higher risk than White women. However, factors contributing to these racial disparities are largely unknown and commonly known factors have not been able to explain them, so strategies to reduce them are absent. CDC reports that the rate of GHSV infection is 4 times higher in AA than White women. Studies have shown that pregnant women with genital herpes simplex virus (GHSV) infection are at higher risk of SMM and that treating women with GHSV using existing anti-herpes medications could reduce SMM risk. To address the question of racial disparities in SMM and examine the comparative effectiveness of treating women with GHSV infection to reduce the risk of SMM, the investigators are conducting a large cohort study with a two-stage design, combining an EMR-based cohort (Stage I) with a sub-cohort interview (Stage II) to examine the impact of confounders not available from EMR data. Based on status of GHSV and treatment, 4 cohorts of women will be established: (1) those with GHSV infection receiving treatment early in pregnancy; (2) those with GHSV infection receiving treatment later in pregnancy; (3) those with GHSV infection untreated during pregnancy; and (4) those without GHSV. Given that racial disparities in SMM present serious challenges, the study will provide much needed data to address the effectiveness of treating GHSV on reducing racial disparities in SMM.
Severe Maternal Morbidity (SMM), as defined by the CDC, has been repeatedly associated with maternal mortality, fetal risk, and long-term maternal risk. SMM is one of PCORI's research priorities (Special Areas of Emphasis, SAE). Racial disparities in SMM have also been well established, with African American (AA) women having more than twice the risk of SMM than White women However, factors contributing to racial disparities in SMM are largely unknown. Commonly known socio-economic factors have not been able to explain these racial disparities. Due to a lack of understanding of factors contributing to racial disparities in SMM, strategies to reduce them are largely absent.
Recent studies have shown that pregnant women with genital herpes simplex virus (GHSV) infection are at higher risk of pregnancy complications, including SMM. This reported association is supported by strong biological plausibility. Once infected, the virus remains in the body permanently, shedding the virus periodically and causing inflammation in the reproductive tract. The virus is often reactivated during pregnancy due to stress, hormonal changes, and weakened immunity, exacerbating existing inflammation and leading to pregnancy complications, including SMM. At the same time, CDC reports have repeatedly shown that the rate of GHSV infection is 4 times higher in AA women than in White women. Thus, the combination of (a) an increased risk of SMM associated with GHSV infection with (b) high GHSV infection rate in AA makes GHSV a likely contributing factor to the persistently observed racial disparities in SMM. More importantly, recent studies, including a pilot study conducted by the investigators, have shown that treating women with GHSV infection using existing anti-herpes medications could lead to reduction in the risk of SMM. Given that it would benefit AA women more because of their higher GHSV infection rate, the treatment could consequently lead to reduction in racial disparities in SMM. Currently, there is a significant knowledge gap regarding the benefit of treating GHSV infection to reduce the risk of SMM and its racial disparities. Thus, pregnant women with GHSV infection, including many AA women, are not being treated during pregnancy. The current CDC guidelines for treating GHSV infection at 36 weeks of gestation are focused on reducing vertical transmission to newborns; thus, the treatment timing is too late to prevent SMM. Thus, a potentially effective treatment in reducing racial disparities in SMM is not being implemented because of the lack of evidence and the knowledge gap which urgently need to be addressed.
To investigate the comparative effectiveness of treating women with GHSV infection, in comparison to not treating or treating too late, to reduce racial disparities in SMM, the investigators will conduct a large cohort study by leveraging their experience and expertise in studying GHSV infection during pregnancy. The study will consist of pregnant women in four cohorts: (1) women with GHSV infection who received treatment early in pregnancy (before the 3rd trimester); (2) women with GHSV infection who received treatment later in pregnancy (during the 3rd trimester); (3) women with GHSV infection without treatment during pregnancy (untreated); and (4) women without GHSV infection (unexposed controls). Data on GHSV infection and its treatment, SMM diagnosis, and potential confounders are available for all included women from electronic medical records (EMRs). In addition, the study will consist of a sub-cohort of 1,200 participants, selected from each of the four cohorts, who will be interviewed to collect data on additional confounders not available from the EMR. These data will allow the investigators to assess the existence of unmeasured confounders and whether they will impact the results, if any.
The specific aims will address these questions:
Aim 1: Is treating GHSV infection in pregnancy effective in mitigating the racial disparities in SMM? Aim 2: Is treating GHSV infection early in pregnancy more effective than later in pregnancy to mitigate the racial disparities in SMM? Aim 3: Does GHSV infection, if untreated, contribute to racial disparities in the risk of SMM?
The proposed study will address not only one of PCORI research priorities (SAE) in relation to severe maternal morbidity, but also another PCORI priority: reducing racial disparities in health outcomes. The study is also rooted in, and supported by, promising preliminary results and emerging literature with biological plausibility (scientific premise). Unlikely other factors that may contribute to racial disparities that are either very difficult to modify (e.g. sociodemographic factors) or impossible to modify (e.g., genetic factors), if the findings of the pilot study are confirmed, GHSV infection is a modifiable factor that can be treated by existing anti-herpes medications. Thus, the study will fill a knowledge gap which could lead to reduction in racial disparities in SMM through changes in clinical practice of how GHSV infection is treated among pregnant women.
All KPNC pregnant women during the study period will be eligible for the study.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Pregnant women with genital herpes infection receiving treatment before the 3rd trimester.
Pregnant women with genital herpes infection receiving treatment during the 3rd trimester.
Pregnant women with untreated genital herpes infection.
Pregnant women (controls) with neither genital herpes infection nor treatment.
Women with SMM
SMM Diagnoses based on CDC's list of 21 indicators
Time frame: During labor and delivery
Started Jan 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2025, 24 months after the start.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.