An interventional study of PET MRI scan in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma, sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-03.
Sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening
Retroperitoneal sarcoma(RPS) is a rare cancer that is difficult to cure as it typically presents as a very large abdominal mass, and complete removal with clear margins is challenging . This study will focus on improving the outcomes of surgery by treating RPS before surgery, to make resection more effective. The role of chemotherapy as a preoperative treatment for RPS is highly controversial. Response to chemotherapy is unpredictable and if the patient's tumour progresses instead of responding, the window of opportunity for resection will be lost. Conventional cross sectional imaging (CT scan) is inadequate to measure response to chemotherapy until 5-6 cycles have been given, possibly with no improvement. Thus it is critical to develop an earlier and reliable way to assess response. Functional imaging by PET scan is used in other tumour types to identify early response to treatment. PET imaging may provide a more meaningful assessment of RPS response to systemic therapy much earlier in the course of treatment than conventional imaging, allowing timely modification of the treatment plan. This study will define the role of PET imaging in evaluating early response to systemic therapy in high grade RPS, improving patient treatment.
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are derived from mesenchymal cells, and can arise at any site. Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) account for \~15% of STS, and patients have much worse survival outcomes than for extremity STS. Local (abdominal) recurrence of RPS is very common, due to the challenges of obtaining complete resection of these large masses that abut critical central compartment structures, such as the inferior vena cava and aorta. There is currently intense interest in using preoperative therapy to downsize/cytoreduce RPS and hopefully improve oncologic outcomes. Studies have shown that preoperative radiation does not cytoreduce these tumours. In this study, the potential of systemic therapy for cytoreduction will be examined.
The standard systemic therapy regimen for treatment of patients with STS remains Adriamycin/Ifosphamide, although side effects can be tolerated only by relatively young and fit patients. The use of this regimen preoperatively for extremity STS results in average response rates of about 30-40%, as judged by histologic assessment of the resected specimen. The international experience with preoperative chemotherapy for RPS is very limited, and there are no published reports.
Functional imaging may provide a more meaningful assessment of tumour response to systemic therapy. PET-MR is a newer modality that may hold promise in assessing solid tumour response and its potential utility is currently of rapidly growing interest. Conventional MRI can offer a more detailed assessment of tumour relationships to adjacent structures than can CT, particularly in STS. Integration of PET with MR has the potential to provide information about metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and to help guide surgical planning.There are no data available on the utility of PET-MR in evaluating tumour response to chemotherapy in STS.
At present, the role of chemotherapy as a preoperative treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is undefined and controversial. The sarcoma group at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PMCC) has had some experience with this treatment paradigm, but like most sarcoma groups in Ontario, and Canada, has reserved preoperative chemotherapy for frankly unresectable and borderline resectable tumours for which downsizing would potentially render resection more feasible. At present, CT-scan imaging is performed after 2 cycles of chemotherapy, and if there is no frank progression of the cancer, chemotherapy is continued for another 3-4 cycles. By that point the tumour is smaller on CT scan in about 30% of patients. There are 2 main problems with this approach: 1)70% of the patients may have undergone 5-6 cycles of chemotherapy with no apparent benefit; and 2) there may be a metabolic response and associated benefit without a change in tumour size. The ability to reliably assess tumour response earlier on (i.e. after 1 cycle) would significantly influence the care of these patients as ineffective chemotherapy could be terminated after 1 cycle and the regimen could be modified, or surgery could happen right away before the window of resectability is lost.
1,667 studies on the registry are indexed under Sarcoma; 393 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 40 across 1,283 interventional studies indexed under Sarcoma.
Browse Sarcoma studies →University Health Network, Toronto is the lead sponsor of 1,411 studies on the registry; 292 are open to participants now.
Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (18%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patient-related criteria
Exclusion Criteria:
Every eligible patient will be scanned by PET-MR at baseline and following 1 cycle of chemotherapy. PET-CT at baseline will also be obtained as it is the current standard of care and will be used to determine trial eligibility (no evidence metastasis at baseline).
Device: PET MRI scan
Standard of care includes a baseline PET-CT and conventional CT after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and after 5-6 cycles, of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as per current practice/ standard of care. Patients that enroll in the trial will receive two additional PET MRI scans- one at baseline and one after 1 cycle of chemotherapy
Correlation of PET imaging with histologic response following preoperative chemotherapy.
Pathology of RPS specimens, resected following standard ifosfamide/doxorubicin chemotherapy every 3 weeks for 5-6 cycles, will be compared with PET response (FDG uptake) after cycle 1 of chemotherapy.
Time frame: 3 years
Correlation of CT imaging with histologic response, and comparing prognostic accuracy of PET-MR vs.CT imaging for histologic response, recurrence status, and survival.
Pathology of resected RPS specimens, resected following standard ifosfamide/doxorubicin chemotherapy every 3 weeks for 5-6 cycles, will be compared with CT response after 2 and 5/6 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy. PET imaging and CT imaging will be compared as prognosticators of histological response, recurrence and survival.
Time frame: 3 years
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Health Network, Toronto