CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04219306Updated Apr 16, 2020

Machine Learning Assisted Recognition of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During Emergency Calls.

An interventional study of Alert on dispatchers screen 'Suspect cardiac arrest' in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, sponsored by Emergency Medical Services, Capital Region, Denmark. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-16.

Sponsored by Emergency Medical Services, Capital Region, Denmark · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2018, registered Dec 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5,242
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Emergency medical Services Copenhagen has developed a machine learning model that analyzes the calls to 1-1-2 (9-1-1) in real time. The model are able to recognize calls where a cardiac arrest is suspected. The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of a computer generated alert in calls where cardiac arrest is suspected.

The study will investigate

  1. whether a potential increase in recognitions is due to machine alerts or the increased focus of the medical dispatcher on recognizing Out-of-Hospital cardiac Arrest (OHCA) when implementing the machine
  2. if a machine learning model based on neural networks, when alerting medical dispatchers will increase overall recognition of OHCA and increase dispatch of citizen responders.
  3. increased use of automated external defibrillators (AED), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or dispatch of citizen responders in cases of OHCA on machine recognised OHCA vs. medical dispatcher recognised OHCA.
Read the detailed description

Chances of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest decrease 10% per minute from collapse until CPR is initiated. dispatcher assisted telephone CPR will be initiated only in cases where the dispatcher recognizes the cardiac arrest.

In a previous project "Can a computer through machine learning recognise of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest during emergency calls" (supported by TrygFoundation), the investigators found, it was possible to create a Machine Learning (ML) model, which could recognise OHCA with higher precision than medical dispatchers at the Emergency Medical Dispatch Center (EMDC-Copenhagen).

In this study the model andt is effect is to be documented in the EMDC-Copenhagen. For this purpose, a computer server running the ML-model are created. This server is integrated in the network at EMDC-Copenhagen, making it possible to push alerts to the medical dispatcher, when a cardiac arrest is recognised by the model.

With aid of machine learning, the hypothesis is, that recognition of OHCA is improved, and happen both more frequent and faster than present.

An instruction for the medical dispatchers is developed, which guides the medical dispatcher in instance of an alert from the machine.

02

Conditions studied

  • Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Keywords

  • Machine learning
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Dispatcher assisted telephone CPR
  • Heart Arrest
  • Heart Diseases
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
03

In context

Heart Arrest

965 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Arrest; 226 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 5,242 is above the median of 100 across 557 interventional studies indexed under Heart Arrest.

Browse Heart Arrest studies →

Lead sponsor

Emergency Medical Services, Capital Region, Denmark is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Call regarding a cardiac arrest registered in the national Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry
  • OHCA is recognized by machine-learning model
  • Call originates from 1-1-2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • OHCA Emergency Medical Services - witnessed
  • Call is from another authority (police or fire brigade)
  • Call is a repeat call
  • Call has been on hold for conference
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
5,242 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Machine alert

    These cardiac suspected cardiac arrest will have had an alert generated by the machine learning model in addition to standard Emergency Medical Services response.

    Other: Alert on dispatchers screen 'Suspect cardiac arrest'

  • No intervention
    Usual care

    These suspected cardiac arrests will receive standard Emergency Medical Services response.

Interventions

  • OtherAlert on dispatchers screen 'Suspect cardiac arrest'

    Alert on dispatchers screen 'Suspect cardiac arrest'

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dispatcher recognition of cardiac arrest

    Dispatcher recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is the primary outcome. Recognition is reported by a questionnaire filled in by a group of auditors listening to recordings of all included calls. The questionnaire is a modified CARES protocol for the calls and consists of 21 questions whereby the quality of the call is evaluated. The questionnaire is validated and has been used in other studies.

    Time frame: During call to emergency Medical Services, up to 15 minutes from call start.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to recognition

    Time from call-start until dispatcher recognition of cardiac arrest

    Time frame: During call to emergency Medical Services, up to 15 minutes from call start.

  2. Dispatcher assisted telephone CPR

    Does the dispatcher ask caller to initiate CPR.

    Time frame: During call to emergency Medical Services, up to 15 minutes from call start.

  3. Time to T-CPR

    Time from call-start until dispatcher starts guiding caller in cpr

    Time frame: During call to emergency Medical Services, up to 15 minutes from call start.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Emergency Medical Services Copenhagen
    Ballerup, Danmark DK-2750, Denmark
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Blomberg SN, Folke F, Ersboll AK, Christensen HC, Torp-Pedersen C, Sayre MR, Counts CR, Lippert FK. Machine learning as a supportive tool to recognize cardiac arrest in emergency calls. Resuscitation. 2019 May;138:322-329. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Jan 18. PubMed 30664917 ↗
  • Blomberg SN, Christensen HC, Lippert F, Ersboll AK, Torp-Petersen C, Sayre MR, Kudenchuk PJ, Folke F. Effect of Machine Learning on Dispatcher Recognition of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During Calls to Emergency Medical Services: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2032320. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32320. PubMed 33404620 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 3, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data will be available upon reasonable request by mail to primary investigator.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 16, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04219306
Lead sponsor
Emergency Medical Services, Capital Region, Denmark
Responsible party
Stig Nikolaj Fasmer Blomberg (PHD-fellow, Emergency Medical Services, Capital Region, Denmark) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 7, 2020
Start date
Sep 1, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2020
Completion
Apr 2, 2020
Last update
Apr 16, 2020

Study contacts

Freddy Lippert, MD
study director · Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion