CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04217200Updated Jun 22, 2020

Pregnancy Dating Test - The Fall of hPL in Urine Over Time

An observational study in Abortion, Complete and Miscarriage Threatening, sponsored by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 52 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-06-22.

Sponsored by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
11
Ages
18 Years to 52 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Earlier studies describe the half-life of hPL in serum as being ninety minutes and that the hormone is excreted unchanged in urine; consequently, there is real potential to use the fall in hormone levels in urine to monitor bleeding in pregnancy, the outcome of natural and artificial abortions or placental health.

This study will focus on the fall of hPL following delivery by Caesarean section when women have a urinary catheter in place and sampling urine is simple to achieve.

Read the detailed description

The hormone hPL has a 90 minute half life in serum and the consequently since it is excreted unchanged in the urine it could be a useful marker to evaluate bleeding in pregnancy, determine if a pregnancy has ended by natural and artificial abortion or if there has been a change in placental function during a normal pregnancy.

The project will recruit twelve pregnant women having an elective Caesarean section to determine the fall in hPL over time. Urine samples will be taken just prior to and then every 30 minutes for the first six hours after delivery by Caesarean section.

Pregnant women presenting for an elective Caesarean section at Guy's \& St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTFT) will be approached to join this study and the following will be done:

  1. Invited to participate in study and given Patient Information Leaflet
  2. Informed consent obtained
  3. Eligibility for inclusion determined
  4. A urine sample (20ml) will be collected prior to the Caesarean from the urinary catheter
  5. Then urine samples (20mls) will be collected every 30 minutes for the first six hours following Caesarean section delivery
  6. The result of the dating ultrasound scan will be added to the trial documentation record
  7. The weight of the baby will be added to the trial documentation record

Consent The patient information leaflet clearly states the purpose of the research and the low risk of participation. The co-signing researcher on the consent form will ensure that the signee understands the alternative, is able to retain the relevant information, has capacity and is exercising free choice.

Risks, burdens and benefits This trial involves the collection of serial urine samples. The clinical history and result of the dating ultrasound scan will be recorded to estimate the gestation at delivery. The analysis of these samples will have no bearing on their clinical care.

Confidentiality All women recruited to the trial will be given a unique trial number. The trial data sheet will have the following information. The trial site, unique trial number, date of birth, date, estimated gestation from the result from the dating ultrasound scan. The samples collected will have the following information recorded: the unique trial number, date of birth, date and trial site code.

Conflict of interest None has been identified.

Use of tissue samples in future research The samples will not be stored.

02

Conditions studied

  • Abortion, Complete
  • Miscarriage Threatening
03

In context

Abortion, Spontaneous

320 studies on the registry are indexed under Abortion, Spontaneous; 53 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 200 across 140 observational studies indexed under Abortion, Spontaneous.

Browse Abortion, Spontaneous studies →

Lead sponsor

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 284 studies on the registry; 79 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 52 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Pregnant women with a singleton pregnancy presenting for a Caesarean section delivery

Inclusion criteria

  1. The women is 18 years of age or older
  2. She understands the patient information leaflet, trial requirements and has signed the consent form
  3. The Caesarean delivery will be at GSTFT
  4. Prepared for urine to be collected for up to when the urinary catheter is removed or six hours, whichever is sooner
  5. Agrees for the demographic and medical history data to be collected.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Under 18 years of age
  2. Unable to understand the patient information leaflet or consent to join the trial
  3. The Caesarean delivery will not be at GSTFT
  4. The women is not for urine to be collected
  5. The women does not agree for demographic or history data to be collected.
  6. The women has a haemorrhage greater than one litre during the Caesarean delivery
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The rate of change in human placental lactogen concentration in urine post delivery by Caesarian section

    Time frame: Baseline and then 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300, 330 & 360 minutes after delivery of the baby by Caesarean section

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
    London, England SE1 7AB, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Whittaker PG, Lind T, Lawson JY. A prospective study to compare serum human placental lactogen and menstrual dates for determining gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jan;156(1):178-82. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90233-x. PubMed 3541617 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — All samples will be labelled with a trial identifier when they are sent to the laboratory for analysis. Only the PI will know the link between the trial identifier and the patient clinic number. The patient clinic number can only be linked to an identifiable patient by staff who have access to the hospital electronic patient record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 22, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04217200
Lead sponsor
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
King's College Hospital NHS Trust
Responsible party
Anatole S Menon-Johansson (Deputy Clinical Lead, Sexual & Reproductive Health Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 3, 2020
Start date
Feb 19, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 26, 2020
Completion
Mar 26, 2020
Last update
Jun 22, 2020

Study contacts

Anatole S Menon-Johansson, PhD,MPH,FRCP
principal investigator · Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion