ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04216706Updated Mar 11, 2020

Early Vascular Adjustments to Prevent Preeclampsia

An observational study in Preeclampsia, Small for Gestational Age at Delivery and HELLP Syndrome, sponsored by Maastricht University Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-11.

Sponsored by Maastricht University Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
314
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Women destined to develop gestational hypertensive complications often exhibit deviant hemodynamic adaptation patterns before overt clinical disease. Gestational hypertension and late onset preeclampsia are associated with an exaggerated rise in cardiac output on top of a higher prepregnant value, whereas a shallow rise in cardiac output and the lack of a peripheral resistance drop predisposes to the much less common early onset-preeclampsia along with impaired fetal growth. Early treatment of altered cardiac output and peripheral resistance adjustments might prevent development of gestational hypertensive complications. The investigators aim to evaluate early cardiovascular adjustments during pregnancy in a high-risk population, and to pharmaceutically adjust deviant cardiovascular adaptations with beta-blockade, centrally acting sympatholytic agents or vasodilating agents when appropriate to prevent adverse effects on neonatal birth weight.

Read the detailed description

Healthy pregnancy is accompanied by major hemodynamic changes that benefit the uteroplacental circulation. A first-trimester drop in vascular resistance triggers several compensatory mechanisms, amongst an increase in blood volume and cardiac output, to maintain blood pressure. These adaptations continue and stand until delivery.

Women destined to develop gestational hypertensive complications often exhibit deviant hemodynamic adaptation patterns before overt clinical disease. On the one hand, gestational hypertension and late onset preeclampsia are associated with an exaggerated rise in cardiac output on top of a higher prepregnant value, whereas a shallow rise in cardiac output and the lack of a peripheral resistance drop predisposes to the much less common early onset-preeclampsia along with impaired fetal growth.

Antihypertensive therapy based on correction of the hemodynamic imbalance between cardiac output and peripheral resistance seems an effective strategy to improve blood pressure control in hypertensive pregnant women. Even more sophisticated, early treatment of altered cardiac output and peripheral resistance adjustments might prevent development of gestational hypertensive complications. One randomized controlled trial treated pregnant women with an augmented cardiac output with a selective beta-blocker, which resulted in a decreased prevalence of preeclampsia from 18% in the placebo group to 4% in the atenolol group (p = 0.04), at a cost of 440gram birth weight.

In line of this reasoning, the investigators aimed to evaluate early cardiovascular adjustments during pregnancy in a high-risk population (i.e. women with preeclampsia in their first pregnancy). In this health care traject, women with deviant adaptation to pregnancy were advised tailored medication, i.e. beta-blockade in women with an pronounced high cardiac output profile effectuated by a high heart rate, and a vasodilating agent in women with a high-resistance hemodynamic profile. Women with a mixed hemodynamic profile were advised a centrally acting sympatholytic agent. The investigators aimed to retrospectively compare outcome of women attending this health care project with women who received care as usual in their second pregnancy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Preeclampsia
  • Small for Gestational Age at Delivery
  • HELLP Syndrome

Keywords

  • cardiac output
  • total peripheral vascular resistance
  • hemodynamic parameters
  • adaptation to pregnancy
  • tailored treatment
03

In context

Pre-Eclampsia

903 studies on the registry are indexed under Pre-Eclampsia; 240 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 314 is above the median of 160 across 389 observational studies indexed under Pre-Eclampsia.

Browse Pre-Eclampsia studies →

Lead sponsor

Maastricht University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 852 studies on the registry; 116 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Pregnant women who had preeclampsia in their first pregnancy

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • first pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia
  • admitted to an extensive non-pregnant cardiovascular and metabolic risk factor assessment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • women without an ongoing pregnancy after 24 weeks' gestational age
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
314 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Tailored treatment advise in suboptimal adaptation

    High-risk women admitted to a non-pregnant cardiovascular and cardiometabolic risk factor assessment are invited to participate in a follow-up program at four time-points during a subsequent pregnancy (i.e. at 12, 16, 20 and 30 weeks of gestational age). This program is additive to regular pregnancy check-ups, and all women are otherwise managed by their referring physicians. The aim of this program is to evaluate adaptation of maternal hemodynamic parameters in response to pregnancy, and to adjust deviant adaptation with tailored antihypertensive medication. Participation in this program is on voluntary basis, and not restricted to severity of complications in the first pregnancy.

    Drug: tailored pharmaceutical treatment

  • Care as usual during pregnancy

    High-risk women admitted to a non-pregnant cardiovascular and cardiometabolic risk factor assessment who do not participate in the additional follow-up program.

Interventions

  • Tailored medication is advised in women with inadequate hemodynamic adaptation to pregnancy. Type of medication depends on total peripheral vascular resistance and heart rate. In short, women with a low peripheral vascular resistance in parallel with a high heart rate are advised a betablocker (labetalol), while a vasodilating agent (calcium channel blocker, nifedipine) was advised in women with a high total peripheral vascular resistance in combination with a low heart rate. Women with suboptimal adaptation to pregnancy without an extreme pronounced vascular profile are advised a centrally acting sympatholytic agent (methyldopa).

    Also known as: Betablocker, Centrally acting sympatholytic agent, Calcium channel blocker

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of women that develop preeclampsia

    Preeclampsia is defined as new-onset hypertension along with de novo proteinuria or other maternal organ dysfunction (i.e. renal insufficiency, liver involvement, neurological complications or hematological complications) after 20 weeks of gestation in previously normotensive women, or superimposed on chronic hypertension.

    Time frame: during pregnancy, or up to 6 weeks after delivery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of women that develop HELLP syndrome

    HELLP-syndrome is defined as hemolysis (LDH \> 600 U/L), elevated liver enzymes (AST -aspartate aminotransferase- and ALT -alanine aminotransferase- \> 70 U/L) and low platelets (platelet count \< 100.109/L)

    Time frame: during pregnancy, or up to 6 weeks after delivery

  2. Number of women that develop eclampsia

    Seizures in women with preeclampsia

    Time frame: during pregnancy, or up to 6 weeks after delivery

  3. Number of women that have placental abruption during pregnancy

    Time frame: During pregnancy or at delivery

  4. Stillbirth

    Number of stillbirths in included women

    Time frame: during pregnancy until delivery

  5. Neonatal mortality

    Number of neonatal demise related to prematurity or as a consequence of maternal disease related to preeclampsia

    Time frame: after delivery up to hospital discharge, which is assessed 6 weeks after due date of the mother

  6. Neonatal birth weight

    birth weight of neonates

    Time frame: measured at delivery

  7. Neonatal birth weight centile

    Neonatal birth weight centile (adjusted for sex of neonate, gestational age at delivery and maternal parity)

    Time frame: birth weight and other parameters measured at delivery

  8. Pregnancy outcome of women included

    Gestational age at delivery

    Time frame: at delivery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Maastricht UMC
    Maastricht, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mulder EG, Ghossein-Doha C, Cauffman E, Lopes van Balen VA, Schiffer VMMM, Alers RJ, Oben J, Smits L, van Kuijk SMJ, Spaanderman MEA. Preventing Recurrent Preeclampsia by Tailored Treatment of Nonphysiologic Hemodynamic Adjustments to Pregnancy. Hypertension. 2021 Jun;77(6):2045-2053. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16502. Epub 2021 Apr 5. PubMed 33813842 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Nov 2014 to primary completion in Jan 2020, 62 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 19, 2019
First posted
Jan 3, 2020
StartActual
Nov 1, 2014
Primary completionActual
Jan 1, 2020
CompletionActual
Mar 1, 2020
Last update
Mar 11, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 11, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04216706
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 3, 2020
Start date
Nov 1, 2014
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2020
Completion
Mar 1, 2020
Last update
Mar 11, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion