CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04210895Updated Apr 14, 2020

Efficacy of Footbaths With Ginger Powder on Subjectively Perceived Quality of Sleep

An interventional study of Ginger powder footbath and Warm water only footbath in Nonorganic Insomnia, sponsored by ARCIM Institute Academic Research in Complementary and Integrative Medicine. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-14.

Sponsored by ARCIM Institute Academic Research in Complementary and Integrative Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
29
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A randomized, controlled trial to explore whether warm footbaths with added ginger powder can improve the sleep quality of adults with self-perceived insomnia symptoms. Participants receive daily footbaths either with warm water alone or with added ginger powder over a period of 2 weeks.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized controlled trial with parallel group design to explore the effects of warm water footbaths with added ginger powder (experimental) compared to footbaths with warm water alone (active comparator) on sleep quality in adults with self-perceived insomnia symptoms. Participants receive daily footbaths 1-3 hours before bedtime over a period of two weeks. The footbaths are prepared by the participants themselves and carried out at their homes. Outcome measures are assessed at baseline (pre intervention) and two weeks after baseline (post intervention). The main focus is on change in subjective quality of sleep as assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The statistical analysis comprises analyses of variance based on linear mixed effects models.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nonorganic Insomnia
03

In context

Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders

1,855 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; 593 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 29 is below the median of 73 across 1,631 interventional studies indexed under Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders.

Browse Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

ARCIM Institute Academic Research in Complementary and Integrative Medicine is the lead sponsor of 30 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • written informed consent
  • age between 18 and 70 years
  • self-reported insomnia symptoms

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known organic insomnia (e.g. periodic leg movements during sleep, restless legs syndrome, sleep apnea syndrome, narcolepsy)
  • current intake of allopathic hypnotics
  • shift work
  • skin lesions at the lower legs or feet
  • known intolerance or hypersensitivity to ginger preparations
  • acute mental disorder
  • varicose vein (degree 3 or 4, classification according to Marshall), chronic venous insufficiency
  • pregnancy
  • participation in other studies
  • insufficient knowledge of the german language
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
29 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Warm footbath with ginger powder

    Participants receive a daily warm water footbath with added ginger powder over a two-week period

    Other: Ginger powder footbath

  • Active comparator
    Warm water only footbath

    Participants receive a daily warm water footbath over a two-week period

    Other: Warm water only footbath

Interventions

  • OtherGinger powder footbath

    40 ± 2 ° C warm water footbath with an additive of dried ginger powder reaching up to mid-calf level

  • OtherWarm water only footbath

    40 ± 2 ° C warm water footbath without any additive reaching up to mid-calf level

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in global PSQI Score

    Global score of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, score between 0=positive extreme and 21=negative extreme

    Time frame: Baseline (pre intervention), 2 weeks after baseline (post intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in subjective sleep quality as assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    Scale of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, score between 0=positive extreme and 3=negative extreme

    Time frame: Baseline (pre intervention), 2 weeks after baseline (post intervention)

  2. Change in sleep latency as assessed by the PSQI

    Scale of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, score between 0=positive extreme and 3=negative extreme

    Time frame: Baseline (pre intervention), 2 weeks after baseline (post intervention)

  3. Change in sleep duration as assessed by the PSQI

    Scale of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, score between 0=positive extreme and 3=negative extreme

    Time frame: Baseline (pre intervention), 2 weeks after baseline (post intervention)

  4. Change in sleep efficiency as assessed by the PSQI

    Scale of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, score between 0=positive extreme and 3=negative extreme

    Time frame: Baseline (pre intervention), 2 weeks after baseline (post intervention)

  5. Change in sleep disturbance as assessed by the PSQI

    Scale of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, score between 0=positive extreme and 3=negative extreme

    Time frame: Baseline (pre intervention), 2 weeks after baseline (post intervention)

  6. Change in use of sleep medication as assessed by the PSQI

    Scale of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, score between 0=positive extreme and 3=negative extreme

    Time frame: Baseline (pre intervention), 2 weeks after baseline (post intervention)

  7. Change in daytime dysfunction as assessed by the PSQI

    Scale of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, score between 0=positive extreme and 3=negative extreme

    Time frame: Baseline (pre intervention), 2 weeks after baseline (post intervention)

  8. Change in the Insomnia Severity Index total score

    Total score of the Insomnia Severity Index, score between 0=no clinically significant insomnia and 28=severe clinical insomnia

    Time frame: Baseline (pre intervention), 2 weeks after baseline (post intervention)

  9. Evening protocol: Change in general well-being as assessed by a standardized sleep diary

    Self-reported well-being measured with a standardized sleep diary (six-point rating scale, higher values represent a better outcome)

    Time frame: In the evening (before going to sleep), during the two-week intervention phase between pre intervention (baseline) and post intervention (2 weeks after baseline)

  10. Evening protocol: Change in the average performance as assessed by a standardized sleep diary

    Self-reported performance measured with a standardized sleep diary (six-point rating scale, lower values represent a better outcome)

    Time frame: In the evening (before going to sleep), during the two-week intervention phase between pre intervention (baseline) and post intervention (2 weeks after baseline)

  11. Evening protocol: Change in fatigue as assessed by a standardized sleep diary

    Self-reported fatigue measured with a standardized sleep diary (four-point rating scale, lower values represent a better outcome)

    Time frame: In the evening (before going to sleep), during the two-week intervention phase between pre intervention (baseline) and post intervention (2 weeks after baseline)

  12. Evening protocol: Change in sleep during daytime as assessed by a standardized sleep diary

    Self-reported sleep during daytime measured with a standardized sleep diary (specification in minutes, lower values represent a better outcome)

    Time frame: In the evening (before going to sleep), during the two-week intervention phase between pre intervention (baseline) and post intervention (2 weeks after baseline)

  13. Morning protocol: Change in recovery ability as assessed by a standardized sleep diary

    Self-reported recovery ability measured with a standardized sleep diary (five-point rating scale, lower values represent a better outcome)

    Time frame: In the morning (after waking up), during the two-week intervention phase between pre intervention (baseline) and post intervention (2 weeks after baseline)

  14. Morning protocol: Change in general well-being as assessed by a standardized sleep diary

    Self-reported well-being measured with a standardized sleep diary (six-point rating scale, higher values represent a better outcome)

    Time frame: In the morning (after waking up), during the two-week intervention phase between pre intervention (baseline) and post intervention (2 weeks after baseline)

  15. Morning protocol: Change in sleep latency as assessed by a standardized sleep diary

    Self-reported sleep latency measured with a standardized sleep diary (specification in minutes, lower values represent a better outcome)

    Time frame: In the morning (after waking up), during the two-week intervention phase between pre intervention (baseline) and post intervention (2 weeks after baseline)

  16. Morning protocol: Change in nocturnal awakening as assessed by a standardized sleep diary

    Self-reported nocturnal awakening measured with a standardized sleep diary (specification in minutes, lower values represent a better outcome)

    Time frame: In the morning (after waking up), during the two-week intervention phase between pre intervention (baseline) and post intervention (2 weeks after baseline)

  17. Morning protocol: Change in sleep duration as assessed by a standardized sleep diary

    Self-reported sleep duration measured with a standardized sleep diary (specification in hours, higher values represent a better outcome)

    Time frame: In the morning (after waking up), during the two-week intervention phase between pre intervention (baseline) and post intervention (2 weeks after baseline)

  18. Change in quality of life as assessed by the 12-Item Short Form Survey

    Scales of the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12), scores between 0=more dysfunction/impairment and 100=less dysfunction/impairment

    Time frame: Baseline (pre intervention), 2 weeks after baseline (post intervention)

  19. Change in subjective feeling of overall warmth as assessed by the Herdecke Warmth Perception Questionnaire

    Self-reported feeling of overall warmth and warmth at the face, trunk anterior/posterior, hands and feet measured with the Herdecke Warmth Perception Questionnaire, scores between 0=cold and 4=hot

    Time frame: Baseline (pre intervention), 2 weeks after baseline (post intervention)

  20. Heart rate variability analysis (HRV): Change in RMSSD

    Root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) \[ms\]. HRV data are obtained from 24-hour ECG measurements with "Cardioscout Multi-ECG" (SR-Medizinelektronik, Stuttgart, Germany)

    Time frame: Baseline (pre intervention) and two weeks after baseline (post intervention)

  21. Heart rate variability analysis (HRV): Change in SDNN

    Standard deviation of normal to normal (NN) intervals (SDNN) \[ms\]. HRV data are obtained from 24-hour ECG measurements with "Cardioscout Multi-ECG" (SR-Medizinelektronik, Stuttgart, Germany)

    Time frame: Baseline (pre intervention) and two weeks after baseline (post intervention)

  22. Heart rate variability analysis (HRV): Change in pNN50

    The proportion of NN50 (number of pairs of successive NNs that differ by more than 50 ms) divided by total number of NNs (pNN50). HRV data are obtained from 24-hour ECG measurements with "Cardioscout Multi-ECG" (SR-Medizinelektronik, Stuttgart, Germany)

    Time frame: Baseline (pre intervention) and two weeks after baseline (post intervention)

  23. Heart rate variability analysis (HRV): Change in VLF

    Very low frequency (VLF, 0.0033 to 0.04 Hz) from frequency domain analysis. HRV data are obtained from 24-hour ECG measurements with "Cardioscout Multi-ECG" (SR-Medizinelektronik, Stuttgart, Germany)

    Time frame: Baseline (pre intervention) and two weeks after baseline (post intervention)

  24. Heart rate variability analysis (HRV): Change in LF

    Low frequency (LF, 0.04 to 0.15 Hz) from frequency domain analysis. HRV data are obtained from 24-hour ECG measurements with "Cardioscout Multi-ECG" (SR-Medizinelektronik, Stuttgart, Germany)

    Time frame: Baseline (pre intervention) and two weeks after baseline (post intervention)

  25. Heart rate variability analysis (HRV): Change in HF

    High frequency (HF, 0.15 to 0.40 Hz) from frequency domain analysis. HRV data are obtained from 24-hour ECG measurements with "Cardioscout Multi-ECG" (SR-Medizinelektronik, Stuttgart, Germany)

    Time frame: Baseline (pre intervention) and two weeks after baseline (post intervention)

  26. Heart rate variability analysis (HRV): Change in LF/HF ratio

    Ratio of two bands from frequency domain analysis: LF band (0.04 to 0.15 Hz) and HF band (0.15 to 0.40 Hz). HRV data are obtained from 24-hour ECG measurements with "Cardioscout Multi-ECG" (SR-Medizinelektronik, Stuttgart, Germany)

    Time frame: Baseline (pre intervention) and two weeks after baseline (post intervention)

  27. Change in distal-proximal skin-temperature gradient

    24-hour measurement of the skin temperature at the feet and abdomen with "MAXIM I-Button™ DS1922L" (Maxim integrated, San Jose, USA). The gradient is calculated by subtracting the proximal value from the distal value.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre intervention) and two weeks after baseline (post intervention)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Arcim Institute
    Filderstadt, Baden-Württemberg 70794, Germany
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified individual participant data will be made available, in addition to study protocol and informed consent form.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 14, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04210895
Lead sponsor
ARCIM Institute Academic Research in Complementary and Integrative Medicine
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 26, 2019
Start date
Jan 7, 2020
Primary completion
Apr 11, 2020
Completion
Apr 11, 2020
Last update
Apr 14, 2020

Study contacts

Jan Vagedes, MD
study director · ARCIM Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion