CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04203238PREMOUpdated Nov 7, 2023Results posted

Potato Research for Enhancing Metabolic Outcomes

An interventional study of Reduced Meat High Potato Diet and Reduced Meat High Pulses Diet in Insulin Resistance and Obesity, sponsored by Pennington Biomedical Research Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-07.

Sponsored by Pennington Biomedical Research Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The potato is a nutritious food that comprises approximately 30% of total vegetable intake in the United States (US). Consumption of pulses in the US is low but its contribution to health is frequently promoted. However, in the US diet, potatoes contribute as much dietary fiber, far more potassium, and a host of similar nutrients as pulses. When prepared to enhance its slowly digested starch content, potatoes produce a moderate glycemic response. In encouraging a shift towards plant-based foods and sustainable diets, the potato can partially replace meat in meat dishes to enhance the overall quality of the diet and reduce meat intake to recommended levels.

Read the detailed description

Approximately 11% of individuals with untreated prediabetes progress to diabetes every year. Reversion to normal blood glucose concentrations reduces the incidence of diabetes by 56%. Healthy eating patterns such as the DASH and the Mediterranean Diet have shown that high intakes of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes or pulses, and potatoes are associated with cardiometabolic health. In contrast, dietary patterns rich in meat and sugar-rich foods are associated with increased risk of mortality, type 2 diabetes, and coronary heart disease. These findings suggest that it may be prudent to replace certain foods with fruits and vegetables rather than simply embrace plant-based diets. Small changes that bestow health benefits are likely to be sustainable in the long-term. The objective of the present application is to develop a diet intervention to reverse insulin resistance in an overweight or obese population. The central hypothesis is that in the context of an overall healthy eating pattern, potatoes and pulses will not differ in the glycemic and insulinemic responses, lipid profile, and hsCRP concentration they elicit.

02

Conditions studied

  • Insulin Resistance
  • Obesity

Browse trials for

03

In context

Insulin Resistance

1,960 studies on the registry are indexed under Insulin Resistance; 306 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is close to the median of 40 across 1,536 interventional studies indexed under Insulin Resistance.

Browse Insulin Resistance studies →

Lead sponsor

Pennington Biomedical Research Center is the lead sponsor of 277 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults from 18 - 60 years of age
  • Body mass index between 25 and 40 kg/m2
  • No evidence of diabetes (fasting blood sugar \<126 mg/dL).
  • HOMA-IR > 2
  • Willing to consume the study foods and refrain from eating other foods for eight weeks.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have type 1 or type 2 diabetes currently being treated by medication.
  • Are being treated with medications that have a significant effect on insulin resistance, obesity, serum lipids, and metabolic rate, or medications that significantly increase body weight such as certain antidepressants, second-generation antipsychotics, systemic glucocorticoids, and adrenergic blockers or stimulators.
  • Current pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Women of childbearing potential who are not using an effective method of birth control (i.e., barrier method, intrauterine and cervical devices, oral contraceptives, hormonal injections (Depo Provera® ), condoms with spermicidal gel or foam, contraceptive patch (Ortho Evra), diaphragm, or abstinence), are not surgically sterilized (including tubal ligation and hysterectomy), or not at least two years postmenopausal. All women of childbearing potential will have a pregnancy test performed prior to starting the study treatment in each cohort. If a subject becomes pregnant during the study, they will be dropped from the study.
  • Have clinically significant abnormal laboratory markers (as determined by the medical investigator).
  • Have contraindications to participation in a diet intervention.
  • Are unable to provide a baseline blood sample.
  • Have any condition that impedes testing of the study hypothesis or makes it unsafe to consume the foods being tested in the study (determined by the investigative team).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Potatoes Lean Meat (PLM)

    The main entrée in the PLM arm will consist of a menu item in which 40% of the meat in the original recipe will be replaced with potatoes. The diet is designed to provide six or less ounces of meat/day which is consistent with the DASH diet.

    Other: Reduced Meat High Potato Diet

  • Experimental
    Lean Meat Pulses (LMP)

    The main entrée in the LMP arm will consist of a menu item in which 40% of the meat in the original recipe will be replaced with pulses. The diet is designed to provide six or less ounces of meat/day which is consistent with the DASH diet.

    Other: Reduced Meat High Pulses Diet

Interventions

  • OtherReduced Meat High Potato Diet

    The main entrée in the PLM arm will consist of a menu item in which 40% of the meat in the original recipe will be replaced with potatoes.

  • OtherReduced Meat High Pulses Diet

    The main entrée in the LMP arm will consist of a menu item in which 40% of the meat in the original recipe will be replaced with pulses.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Glycemic Response to the Diet

    Change in area under the curve for blood glucose (mg/dL/min) concentration in response to the diet. Negative values are considered a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Insulin Response to the Diet

    change in area under the curve for blood insulin (uU/mL/min) concentration in response to the diet. Negative values are considered a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

  2. Cholesterol Response to the Diet

    change in blood cholesterol (mg/dL) concentration in response to the diet. Negative values are considered a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

  3. Triglyceride Response to the Diet

    change in blood triglyceride (mg/dL) concentration in response to the diet. Negative values are considered a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

  4. LDL Particle Size Response to the Diet

    change in LDL particle size (nm) in response to the diet. Negative values are considered a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

  5. hsCRP Response to the Diet

    change in hsCRP (mg/L) in response to the diet. Positive values are considered a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

07

Results

Posted Nov 7, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePotatoes Lean Meat (PLM)Lean Meat Pulses (LMP)
Started1818
Completed1417
Not completed41
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject11
Withdrew: Covid-1930

Outcome measures

PrimaryGlycemic Response to the Diet

Change in area under the curve for blood glucose (mg/dL/min) concentration in response to the diet. Negative values are considered a better outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline and 8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg/dL/min
Glycemic Response to the Diet
mg/dL/minPotatoes Lean Meat (PLM)Lean Meat Pulses (LMP)
Glycemic Response to the Diet-103.44 ± 430.04-501.91 ± 406.83
SecondaryInsulin Response to the Diet

change in area under the curve for blood insulin (uU/mL/min) concentration in response to the diet. Negative values are considered a better outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline and 8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · uU/ml/min
Insulin Response to the Diet
uU/ml/minPotatoes Lean Meat (PLM)Lean Meat Pulses (LMP)
Insulin Response to the Diet-966.63 ± 1012.49-2136.32 ± 955.53
SecondaryCholesterol Response to the Diet

change in blood cholesterol (mg/dL) concentration in response to the diet. Negative values are considered a better outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline and 8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg/dL
Cholesterol Response to the Diet
mg/dLPotatoes Lean Meat (PLM)Lean Meat Pulses (LMP)
Cholesterol Response to the Diet-5.01 ± 3.57-11.79 ± 3.25
SecondaryTriglyceride Response to the Diet

change in blood triglyceride (mg/dL) concentration in response to the diet. Negative values are considered a better outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline and 8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg/dL
Triglyceride Response to the Diet
mg/dLPotatoes Lean Meat (PLM)Lean Meat Pulses (LMP)
Triglyceride Response to the Diet-4.67 ± 19.25-2.88 ± 17.94
SecondaryLDL Particle Size Response to the Diet

change in LDL particle size (nm) in response to the diet. Negative values are considered a better outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline and 8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · nm
LDL Particle Size Response to the Diet
nmPotatoes Lean Meat (PLM)Lean Meat Pulses (LMP)
LDL Particle Size Response to the Diet-0.27 ± 0.13-0.38 ± 0.12
SecondaryhsCRP Response to the Diet

change in hsCRP (mg/L) in response to the diet. Positive values are considered a worse outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline and 8 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg/L
hsCRP Response to the Diet
mg/LPotatoes Lean Meat (PLM)Lean Meat Pulses (LMP)
hsCRP Response to the Diet0.51 ± 1.430.24 ± 1.32
Statistical analysis
  • Potatoes Lean Meat (PLM) vs Lean Meat Pulses (LMP) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.05 · Median difference (final values): 0.89

Adverse events

Collected over 8 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Potatoes Lean Meat (PLM)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)
Lean Meat Pulses (LMP)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)2/18 (11.1%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPotatoes Lean Meat (PLM)Lean Meat Pulses (LMP)
gastrointestinalGastrointestinal disorders0/182/18

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years and standard error)Potatoes Lean Meat (PLM)Lean Meat Pulses (LMP)Total
Mean44.6 ± 2.645.4 ± 2.645 ± 1.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Potatoes Lean Meat (PLM)Lean Meat Pulses (LMP)Total
Female141428
Male448
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Potatoes Lean Meat (PLM)Lean Meat Pulses (LMP)Total
White111223
Non-White7613
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Potatoes Lean Meat (PLM)Lean Meat Pulses (LMP)Total
United States181836
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Rebello CJ, Beyl RA, Greenway FL, Atteberry KC, Hoddy KK, Kirwan JP. Low-Energy Dense Potato- and Bean-Based Diets Reduce Body Weight and Insulin Resistance: A Randomized, Feeding, Equivalence Trial. J Med Food. 2022 Dec;25(12):1155-1163. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2022.0072. Epub 2022 Nov 11. PubMed 36367708 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 19, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 7, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04203238
Lead sponsor
Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Collaborators
Alliance for Potato Research and Education
Responsible party
John Kirwan (Executive Director, Pennington Biomedical Research Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 18, 2019
Start date
Sep 4, 2019
Primary completion
May 18, 2021
Completion
May 18, 2021
Results posted
Nov 7, 2023
Last update
Nov 7, 2023

Study contacts

John Kirwan, PhD
principal investigator · Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion