ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04200287Updated May 13, 2022

Study to Improve Survivorship Care Related to Fertility and Family-building After Cancer

An interventional study of Online decision aid tool in Cancer, sponsored by Stanford University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-13.

Sponsored by Stanford University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this research is to explore how a patient decision aid tool (website) given to patients prior to their survivorship care visits, may impact patient-provider communication about fertility and family-building after cancer; and assess the impact of using the tool on patient reported outcomes. The overall purpose of this research is to improve survivorship care by establishing a multi-disciplinary approach to managing cancer and fertility issues and prompt early referral to supportive and medical care resources.

Read the detailed description

Objective 1: Establish feasibility and acceptability of conducting research with YA-F cancer survivors at the Stanford Cancer Institute (SCI) and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (LPCH).

Hypothesis 1: Study procedures will be feasible in the given timeframe and acceptable to patients, as evidence by recruitment, enrollment, and completion rates and participant feedback.

Objective 2: Evaluate the impact of using the tool as a part of survivorship care on patient reported outcomes (PROs; i.e., information needs, fertility distress, decision-making uncertainty, and satisfaction with care).

Hypothesis 2: In a single-arm pilot study (N=20), use of the decision aid tool will lead to improvements in fertility distress, decision-making uncertainty, and satisfaction with care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Neoplasms

9,610 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,508 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 50 across 7,429 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,161 studies on the registry; 428 are open to participants now.

Of its 268 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 207 (77%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • completed cancer treatment at least 6-months prior, excluding long-term adjuvant or maintenance therapies
  • report an interest in discussing fertility/family-building with a provider
  • understands verbal and written English
  • access to the Internet and use of a computer, tablet, or smartphone
  • has a scheduled cancer survivorship visit within the study time frame

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior hospitalization for a mental disorder or history of psychosis

Note: Survivors on adjuvant maintenance or endocrine treatment, such as tamoxifen, will not be excluded because clinical guidelines allow treatment delay or hiatus to accommodate fertility

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Young adult female (YA-F) cancer survivors

    YA-F cancer survivors will complete a baseline survey (T1) of sociodemographic and patient reported outcomes (PRO) and then will be sent a link to access the decision aid tool (website) with instructions to review the website before their upcoming visit. A follow-up survey (T2) will be emailed 4-weeks post-baseline, prior to their clinic visit, to evaluate website access and PROs. A post-visit survey (T3) will be emailed 6- weeks post-baseline (after their survivorship care visit) to assess PROs.

    Behavioral: Online decision aid tool

Interventions

  • BehavioralOnline decision aid tool

    The decision aid intervention will be presented via a website

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)

    The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) is a validated survey that assesses personal uncertainty in making healthcare decisions; modifiable factors contributing to uncertainty; and the quality of the decision made. It is reliable and responsive to change, and the most widely used measure of decision-making quality. The survey has 16 questions, with responses on a 5-point scale ranging from "strongly agree" (1) to "strongly disagree" (5). Total scores range from 16 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater uncertainty (worse outcome). The outcome will be reported as the mean difference from baseline to 4-week and 6-week follow-up time points, with standard deviation.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Unmet Fertility Information

    This investigator-designed survey assesses perceived information needs about fertility topics such as the risk of infertility; risk of early menopause; options to assess fertility status; options to preserve fertility; and options for alternative family-building. The survey has 5 questions, each answered by a Yes / No response. Yes is scored as 1, and no is scored as 0. Total scores range from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater perceived knowledge. The outcome will be reported as the mean difference from baseline to 4-week and 6-week follow-up time points, with standard deviation.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Reproductive Concerns After Cancer (RCAC) Scale

    The Reproductive Concerns After Cancer (RCAC) Scale is a validated survey of cancer survivors' fertility and health concerns. The survey has 18 questions, answered on a 5-point scale ranging from "strongly disagree" (1) to "strongly agree" (5). Total scores range from 18 to 90, with higher scores indicating greater distress (worse outcome). The outcome will be reported as the mean difference from baseline to 4-week and 6-week followup time points, with standard deviation.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. COMRADE

    The COMRADE is a measure of patient-based outcomes of risk communication within patient-provider interactions and treatment decision-making effectiveness. It consists of two subscales: Satisfaction with Communication \& Confidence in Decision-making. Items were adapted to refer to fertility and reproductive health care options. The measure has 20 questions. Items are answered on a 5-point scale from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree," with high scores indicating better outcomes.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Stanford Medical Center
    Stanford, California 94304, United States
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Informed consent form · May 14, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 13, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04200287
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 16, 2019
Start date
Jan 6, 2020
Primary completion
Sep 11, 2021
Completion
Sep 11, 2021
Last update
May 13, 2022

Study contacts

Catherine Benedict
principal investigator · Stanford University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion