ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04199429Updated Dec 13, 2019

Relationship-based Care Model in Pediatrics

An interventional study of Relationship-Based Care in Depression, Anxiety and Nurse-Patient Relations, sponsored by University of Urbino "Carlo Bo". Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-13.

Sponsored by University of Urbino "Carlo Bo" · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2016, registered Dec 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aim: To evaluate whether the application of the Relationship-based Care (RBC) model as a treatment called "Take 5 minutes" (T5M) affects the level of anxiety and depression of the parent, the level of the parent perceived quality of nursing care and the work satisfaction of the nursing staff.

Design: Single-blind randomized controlled trial.

Methods: The trial was performed from February to July 2016. The trial was conducted with one intervention (N=101) and one control group (N=90). Nurses applied the RBC model as a treatment, named "Take 5 Minutes", that consisted of dedicating some short time (from 5 to 10 minutes) to the relationship with the parents, using specifically designed communication strategies. The primary outcome was the evaluation of anxiety and depression of parents, the secondary was the parent perceived quality of nursing care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression, Anxiety
  • Nurse-Patient Relations

Keywords

  • Relationship-based care
  • Pediatric
  • Caregiver anxiety
  • Nurse job satisfaction
  • Nurse
03

In context

Depression

8,577 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,720 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 180 is above the median of 81 across 7,063 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Urbino "Carlo Bo" is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • the parents of the children admitted to two Pediatric Units in a nationally renowned university hospital in the North-East of Italy
  • had knowledge of the Italian language spoken and written
  • were available for participation in the study by signing the

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parents of hospitalized patients for a duration of less than 4 days
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
180 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental

    Each nurse applied the RBC model through the treatment "Take 5 minutes" (T5M), to parents allocated to the experimental group. This consisted in devoting some time (from 5 to 10 minutes) to improving the relationship with the parent. This treatment can be considered as the practical development of the core principles of the RBC model by the study team. During the T5M the nurse applied the strategies of empathic communication and active listening, learned during the education and training phase. The treatment lasted from 5 to 10 minutes and was delivered once per day during the admission of the patient. The T5M time was considered as additional or supplementary, but not substitutive, of the standard nursing time dedicated daily to patients and parents.

    Behavioral: Relationship-Based Care

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Standard nursing time dedicated daily to patients and parents.

    Behavioral: Relationship-Based Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralRelationship-Based Care
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from T0 to T1 and T2 of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) has been used to determine the anxiety and depression of the parents of hospitalized children. HADS is a fourteen items scale (seven items related to anxiety and seven to depression): each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression. A cut-off point of 8/21 for anxiety or depression has been previously established in the literature.

    Time frame: T0: admission of the patient; T1: 4th day after the admission; T2: at discharge (expected mean value = 6.2 days after admission [standard deviation = 2.0])

Secondary outcomes

  1. Caring Behaviors Inventory (CBI)

    The Caring Behaviors Inventory (CBI) was used to assess the quality of nursing care perceived by the parents. CBI has 24-items, divided into four dimensions: presence, compliance, competence, and care; each item is a Likert-scale ranging from 0 to 4.

    Time frame: T2: at discharge of the patient (expected mean value = 6.2 days after admission [standard deviation = 2.0])

  2. Change of the job satisfaction of the nurses

    A "Job Satisfaction" questionnaire was used to measure the job satisfaction of the nurses. This questionnaire is composed by 44-items. It was assessed at the beginning (February 2016) and at the end (July 2016) of the data collection.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • De Barbieri I, Sisti D, Di Falco A, Galeazzo M, Amatori S, Rocchi MBL, Perilongo G. Relationship-based care model in paediatrics: A randomized controlled trial to implement the parents' perception of the quality of nursing care. J Adv Nurs. 2020 Dec;76(12):3597-3608. doi: 10.1111/jan.14585. Epub 2020 Oct 3. PubMed 33009852 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2016 to primary completion in Jul 2016, 5 months.

Of 3,468 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Depression, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 41. This study's 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,566 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 2, 2019
First posted
Dec 13, 2019
StartActual
Feb 2016
Primary completionActual
Jul 2016
CompletionActual
Jul 2016
Last update
Dec 13, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 13, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04199429
Lead sponsor
University of Urbino "Carlo Bo"
Responsible party
Davide Sisti (Principal Investigator, University of Urbino "Carlo Bo") — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 13, 2019
Start date
Feb 2016
Primary completion
Jul 2016
Completion
Jul 2016
Last update
Dec 13, 2019

Study contacts

Davide Sisti, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University of Urbino "Carlo Bo"

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion