ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04192448MMAUpdated May 29, 2024Results posted

Men, Mood, and Attention Study: Examination of Alcohol, State Anger, and Emotion Regulation Sexual Aggression

An interventional study of Alcohol Administration and Mood Induction in Alcohol Intoxication and Anger, sponsored by Elizabeth C Neilson. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 21 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-29.

Sponsored by Elizabeth C Neilson · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Why this study was terminated
Procedures not feasible due to COVID-19 and administrative concerns
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 35 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Given the public health and social relevance of sexual aggression and the gap in the extant literature regarding state anger, emotion regulation, alcohol, and sexual aggression, the present study will contribute to our understanding of emotion regulation's role in sexual aggression perpetration. The proposed 2-year research plan will examine the effects of alcohol intoxication, state anger, and emotion regulation on men's sexual aggression intentions. This study will recruit non-monogamous, men (individuals who identify their gender as male and whose biological sex is male) who have sex with women, ages 21-35. While more research on female perpetrators is needed, the proposed study will exclusively recruit males for the following reasons: 1) the scientific literature indicating the majority of sexually aggressive acts are perpetrated by men; and 2) the current sexual aggression analog has not been piloted with female participants and would require preliminary experiments to determine its appropriateness. The study will utilize a 2x2 design in which participants are randomized to beverage condition [alcohol (target BAC= .08gm%) or control (no alcohol control)] and an emotion induction (anger induction or control). The outcomes will be assessed using a sexual aggression analog which participants will complete on the descending limb of alcohol intoxication and indicate the likelihood that they would engage in various sexually aggressive acts. The study also includes self-report measurements of state anger and emotion regulation to explore emotion regulation as a moderator in the associations among alcohol intoxication, state anger, and sexual aggression intentions.

Read the detailed description

Males ages 21 to 35 will be recruited from the community through fliers and advertisements in bars and local publications (print and electronic) and instructed to call the lab for telephone screening or complete an online web-screening survey. Sexual aggression is a pervasive and highly prevalent problem on college campuses, so the project will heavily advertise at the local college campus. The screening will include an assessment of typical alcohol consumption patterns, risk for current or past alcohol use disorder, and sexual risk-taking.

Participants (N=180) will be compensated $10 per hour of lab participation for a maximum payment of $80. Participants will begin by completing a series of background measures (see Measures) related to alcohol consumption and expectations, sexual aggression perpetration history, trait anger, and trait emotion regulation. Participants will complete factors of personality that have demonstrated associations with both emotion regulation and sexual aggression as covariates, including psychopathy, sensation seeking, and impulsivity.

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive beverages consisting of either an alcohol dose (target peak BAC =.08gm%) or a control (non-alcoholic) beverage. Participants will be informed into which alcohol condition they have been assigned. Using a double-blind procedure, participants will be block randomized by self-reported sexual aggression perpetration history [(none = no history of perpetration) vs. (low = history of unwanted sexual contact or sexual coercion) vs. (high = attempted or completed perpetration of incapacitated or forced rape)]. A computer algorithm will be used to assign participants to the experimental conditions such that participants with none, low, and high perpetration history are evenly distributed across beverage conditions. Individuals assigned to the alcohol condition will consume a beverage comprised of cranberry juice and 100 proof vodka, while individuals assigned to the control condition will consume a beverage comprised of cranberry juice and water. The total liquid is divided equally between three cups, and participant is given nine minutes to consume the total amount (e.g., three minutes per cup). To ensure stable absorption of alcohol and decrease the likelihood of nausea, the experimenter will instruct the participant to consume the beverages evenly and to avoid drinking quickly. Following beverage administration, participants will be Breathalyzed every five minutes until they attain two Breathalyzer readings of .08%gm to ensure their BAC will descend during the emotion induction and sexual aggression analog. A yoking procedure will be employed for control participants in which each control participant is paired with an alcohol dose participant and receive an equal number of Breathalyzer checks.

Participants will also be randomly assigned to an emotion induction condition consisting of either an anger emotion induction or a control emotion induction. This study will employ deception as individuals will not be told they have been assigned to different emotion induction conditions. The emotion induction consists of two parts: 1) an emotion recall task; and 2) provocation task. Individuals assigned to the anger induction will be instructed to recall an incident in the last 30 days when they felt angry, frustrated, or "pissed off". They will then be given five minutes to write as much as possible about that incident and their response. Participants in the control condition will be instructed to write for five minutes about a neutral topic (e.g., cooking dinner, going for a walk; Marci et al., 2007). The writing samples from all participants will be collected and coded by independent coders to identify whether participants accurately engaged in the task. Following the emotion recall portion of the induction, participants will begin a provocation task. Both groups will begin an attention task. Participants assigned to the anger condition will be given negative feedback about their performance. Participants assigned to the control condition will complete the task without feedback and then will be thanked for their participation.

Upon completion of both portions of the emotion induction, participants will read and project themselves into a written hypothetical sexual situation displayed on a computer. The stimulus story will be approximately 1,600 words and be written at a 5th grade reading level. The story will depict a sexual encounter between the participant and a hypothetical female, in which the female in the story will initially engage in consensual sexual activity however will gradually display and express resistance to engaging in intercourse. Participants will then complete assessment of outcome measures.

Immediately after completing the scenario, participants will be required to watch one of three neutral videos (e.g., comedy clips, nature documentaries) to assist with distancing and detaching from the content of the story. After completing the videos, sober participants will be debriefed and paid for their time. Intoxicated participants will be provided with food, beverages, and entertainment until their BAC descended to below .04%gm. Once their BAC has descended to below .04%gm, these participants will be debriefed and paid for their time.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alcohol Intoxication
  • Anger

Keywords

  • Sexual Violence
  • Alcohol consumption
03

In context

Alcoholic Intoxication

76 studies on the registry are indexed under Alcoholic Intoxication; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 3 is below the median of 135 across 62 interventional studies indexed under Alcoholic Intoxication.

Browse Alcoholic Intoxication studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Elizabeth C Neilson as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Biologically male and identify their gender as male
  • Between the ages of 21-35
  • Must be Interested in sexual activity with women
  • Must have engaged in at least one instance of sex without a condom in the last six months
  • Must on average consume between 5 and 25 standard drinks per week
  • Must have previously had an instance of heavy episodic drinking (HED; at least five alcoholic drinks in two hours) in the last six months
  • No history of or current alcohol problems (as determined by the Brief Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test)
  • No past or current medical condition or take medications which contraindicate alcohol consumption

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • being in a monogamous relationship of longer than six months or not having sexual intercourse at all within the past six months
  • Any history or current alcohol problems (as determined by the Brief Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test)
  • Currently taking medications which contraindicate alcohol consumption
  • Currently or ever diagnosed with a medical condition that contraindicates alcohol consumption
  • Currently enrolled as a student at Morehead State University
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
3 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    AlcoholxAnger

    Participant will receive alcohol, the dose of which will be administered to result in a BAC of .08%. Participants will also receive an anger emotion induction, in which the experience of frustration and irritability is induced.

    Other: Alcohol Administration · Other: Mood Induction

  • Experimental
    AlcoholxControl

    Participant will receive alcohol, the dose of which will be administered to result in a BAC of .08%. Participants will also receive a control emotion induction, in which they are exposed to a neutral mood induction.

    Other: Alcohol Administration · Other: Mood Induction

  • Experimental
    SoberxAnger

    Participant will not receive alcohol, therefore their BAC will be .00%. Participants will also receive an anger emotion induction, in which the experience of frustration and irritability is induced.

    Other: Alcohol Administration · Other: Mood Induction

  • Sham comparator
    SoberxControl

    Participant will not receive alcohol, therefore their BAC will be .00%. Participants will also receive a control emotion induction, in which they are exposed to a neutral mood induction.

    Other: Alcohol Administration · Other: Mood Induction

Interventions

  • OtherAlcohol Administration

    The clinical trial does not involve any treatment. Participant will be randomly assigned to receive alcohol (BAC = .08%) or water (BAC = .00%).

  • OtherMood Induction

    The clinical trial does not involve any treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive an anger emotion induction or a control (neutral) mood induction.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sexual Aggression Intentions

    Mean score of 22 items assessing behavioral intentions (1 = Not at Likely to 7 = Very Likely) to act sexually aggressively against a hypothetical female

    Time frame: 20 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physical Aggression Intentions

    Mean score of 5 items assessing behavioral intentions (1 = Not at All to 7 = Extremely) of intentions to act physically aggressively against a hypothetical female

    Time frame: 20 minutes

  2. Psychological Aggression Intentions

    Mean score of 3 items assessing behavioral intentions (1 = Not at All to 7 = Extremely) of intentions to act psychologically aggressively against a hypothetical female

    Time frame: 20 minutes

07

Results

Posted May 29, 2024
Limitations and caveats
The most notable limitation to the current study is the sample size. The study was terminated after three participants were enrolled from October 2020 to May 2021. Extensive efforts were undertaken to improve recruitment, however administrative limitations placed upon the study by the institution and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic presented barriers to recruitment. While the Results presented indicate the scores obtained from the data, the sample is too small to draw any meaningful conclusions.

Participant flow

Recruitment for the study began in September 2020 after IRB approval was obtained for study modifications necessary to comply with COVID-related safety precautions. Advertisements were placed in local business, emphasizing alcohol-serving establishments, and authorized posting areas in local community colleges and four-year universities. Online advertisements were posted in social media sites (e.g., Facebook, Instagram) and forums (e.g., Reddit, Craiglist). Recruitment continued until May 2021.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAlcoholxAngerAlcoholxControlSoberxAngerSoberxControl
Started1101
Completed1101
Not completed0000

Outcome measures

PrimarySexual Aggression Intentions

Mean score of 22 items assessing behavioral intentions (1 = Not at Likely to 7 = Very Likely) to act sexually aggressively against a hypothetical female

Time frame:
20 minutes
Reported as:
Number · score on a scale
Sexual Aggression Intentions
score on a scaleAlcoholxAngerAlcoholxControlSoberxAngerSoberxControl
Sexual Aggression Intentions2.184.73—1.64
Statistical analysis
  • AlcoholxAnger vs AlcoholxControl vs SoberxControl · t-test, 1 sided · p = .28 · Mean difference (final values): 1.82 · 95% CI -29.82 to 26.19The estimation parameter refers to the mean difference in the outcome between those in the Alcohol condition and those in the Sober condition. A positive value indicates greater likelihood of sexual aggression among those in the Alcohol condition.
  • AlcoholxAnger vs AlcoholxControl vs SoberxControl · t-test, 1 sided · p = .39 · Mean difference (final values): -1.0 · 95% CI -33.01 to 35.01The estimation parameter refers to the mean difference in the outcome between those in the Anger condition and those in the Control condition. A negative value indicates greater likelihood of sexual aggression among those in the Control condition.
SecondaryPhysical Aggression Intentions

Mean score of 5 items assessing behavioral intentions (1 = Not at All to 7 = Extremely) of intentions to act physically aggressively against a hypothetical female

Time frame:
20 minutes
Reported as:
Number · score on a scale
Physical Aggression Intentions
score on a scaleAlcoholxAngerAlcoholxControlSoberxAngerSoberxControl
Physical Aggression Intentions1.01.25—1.0
Statistical analysis
  • AlcoholxAnger vs AlcoholxControl vs SoberxControl · t-test, 1 sided · p = .33 · Mean difference (final values): 0.25 · 95% CI -2.88 to 2.63The estimation parameter refers to the mean difference in the outcome between those in the Alcohol condition and those in the Sober condition. A positive value indicates greater likelihood of physical aggression among those in the Alcohol condition.
  • AlcoholxAnger vs AlcoholxControl vs SoberxControl · t-test, 1 sided · p = .33 · Mean difference (final values): -.25 · 95% CI -2.53 to 2.88The estimation parameter refers to the mean difference in the outcome between those in the Anger condition and those in the Control condition. A negative value indicates greater likelihood of physical aggression among those in the Control condition.
SecondaryPsychological Aggression Intentions

Mean score of 3 items assessing behavioral intentions (1 = Not at All to 7 = Extremely) of intentions to act psychologically aggressively against a hypothetical female

Time frame:
20 minutes
Reported as:
Number · score on a scale
Psychological Aggression Intentions
score on a scaleAlcoholxAngerAlcoholxControlSoberxAngerSoberxControl
Psychological Aggression Intentions1.672.33—1.33
Statistical analysis
  • AlcoholxAnger vs AlcoholxControl vs SoberxControl · t-test, 1 sided · p = .23 · Mean difference (final values): .67 · 95% CI -8.00 to 6.67The estimation parameter refers to the mean difference in the outcome between those in the Alcohol condition and those in the Sober condition. A positive value indicates greater likelihood of psych aggression among those in the Alcohol condition.
  • AlcoholxAnger vs AlcoholxControl vs SoberxControl · t-test, 1 sided · p = .44 · Mean difference (final values): -.17 · 95% CI -10.84 to 11.17The estimation parameter refers to the mean difference in the outcome between those in the Alcohol condition and those in the Sober condition. A negative value indicates greater likelihood of psych aggression among those in the Control condition.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were directly collected during the course of a participant's engagement in the study, which was approximately 5 to 7 1/2 hours. Participants were provided with contact information for the research team and IRB and encouraged to contact either the PI or IRB if they believed they had been negatively affected by the study. The PI monitored study email and voicemail for 1 year.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
AlcoholxAnger0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)
AlcoholxControl0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)
SoberxAnger———
SoberxControl0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

The baseline population met all the inclusion criteria as outlined in the initial proposal, thus were cisgender men who engaged in moderate to heavy drinking and sexual risk-taking. The number enrolled is substantively different than proposed due to administrative barriers to the study and COVID-related barriers that impacted recruitment (closure of alcohol-serving establishments, community concern regarding participation in in-person studies during the pandemic).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)AlcoholxAngerAlcoholxControlSoberxAngerSoberxControlTotal
Mean31 ± 035 ± 0—30 ± 032 ± 2.65
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AlcoholxAngerAlcoholxControlSoberxAngerSoberxControlTotal
Female00000
Male11013
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)AlcoholxAngerAlcoholxControlSoberxAngerSoberxControlTotal
Race and Ethnicity — White/Non-Latino11002
Race and Ethnicity — Black or African American/Non-Latino00011
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)AlcoholxAngerAlcoholxControlSoberxAngerSoberxControlTotal
United States11013
Sexual Experiences Survey
Sexual Experiences Survey(units on a scale)AlcoholxAngerAlcoholxControlSoberxAngerSoberxControlTotal
Mean3 ± 00 ± 0—4 ± 02.33 ± 2.08
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale(units on a scale)AlcoholxAngerAlcoholxControlSoberxAngerSoberxControlTotal
Mean88 ± 062 ± 0—73 ± 074.33 ± 13.05
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Morehead State University
    Morehead, Kentucky 40351, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Muehlenhard CL, Peterson ZD, Humphreys TP, Jozkowski KN. Evaluating the One-in-Five Statistic: Women's Risk of Sexual Assault While in College. J Sex Res. 2017 May-Jun;54(4-5):549-576. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2017.1295014. Epub 2017 Apr 4. PubMed 28375675 ↗
  • Abbey A. Alcohol-related sexual assault: a common problem among college students. J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 2002 Mar;(14):118-28. doi: 10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.118. PubMed 12022717 ↗
  • Abbey A, Wegner R. Using Experimental Paradigms to Examine Alcohol's Role in Men's Sexual Aggression: Opportunities and Challenges in Proxy Development. Violence Against Women. 2015 Aug;21(8):975-96. doi: 10.1177/1077801215589378. Epub 2015 Jun 5. PubMed 26048214 ↗
  • DeGue S, Valle LA, Holt MK, Massetti GM, Matjasko JL, Tharp AT. A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. Aggress Violent Behav. 2014 Jul-Aug;19(4):346-362. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2014.05.004. PubMed 29606897 ↗
  • Connor JP, Grier M, Feeney GF, Young RM. The validity of the Brief Michigan Alcohol Screening Test (bMAST) as a problem drinking severity measure. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Sep;68(5):771-79. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.771. PubMed 17690811 ↗
  • Martin CS, Sayette MA. Experimental design in alcohol administration research: limitations and alternatives in the manipulation of dosage-set. J Stud Alcohol. 1993 Nov;54(6):750-61. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1993.54.750. PubMed 8271813 ↗
  • Giancola PR, Zeichner A. The biphasic effects of alcohol on human physical aggression. J Abnorm Psychol. 1997 Nov;106(4):598-607. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.106.4.598. PubMed 9358690 ↗
  • Davis KC, George WH, Norris J, Schacht RL, Stoner SA, Hendershot CS, Kajumulo KF. Effects of alcohol and blood alcohol concentration limb on sexual risk-taking intentions. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009 Jul;70(4):499-507. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2009.70.499. PubMed 19515289 ↗
  • Laber EB, Shedden K. Statistical Significance and the Dichotomization of Evidence: The Relevance of the ASA Statement on Statistical Significance and p-values for Statisticians. J Am Stat Assoc. 2017;112(519):902-904. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1311265. Epub 2017 Oct 30. No abstract available. PubMed 29348701 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2020 to primary completion in Aug 2021, 11 months.

Results were first posted in May 2024, 2 years 8 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 7, 2019
First posted
Dec 10, 2019
StartActual
Sep 1, 2020
Primary completionActual
Aug 31, 2021
CompletionActual
Aug 31, 2021
Results first posted
May 29, 2024
Last update
May 29, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04192448
Lead sponsor
Elizabeth C Neilson
Responsible party
Elizabeth C Neilson (Assistant Professor, Morehead State University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Dec 10, 2019
Start date
Sep 1, 2020
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2021
Completion
Aug 31, 2021
Results posted
May 29, 2024
Last update
May 29, 2024

Study contacts

Elizabeth C Neilson, PhD
principal investigator · Assistant Professor

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion