CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04180280SWIMS2Updated May 19, 2020

Comparative Effectiveness of Brief HIV Care Counseling

An interventional study of Behavioral self-regulation Phone counseling to improve HIV care and Behavioral self-regulation Office counseling to improve HIV care in HIV/AIDS, sponsored by University of Connecticut. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-05-19.

Sponsored by University of Connecticut · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2017, registered Nov 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Retention in care and persistent adherence to antiretroviral therapy is necessary for the successful treatment of HIV infection. Alcohol use is known to impede the health care and health outcomes of people living with HIV. The proposed comparative effectiveness study will evaluate the outcomes as well as the facilitators and barriers to implementing a theory-based alcohol counseling intervention that objectively monitors HIV treatment adherence with corrective feedback and increases care engagement delivered by cell phone in resource limited clinical settings.

Read the detailed description

This application proposes to evaluate the implementation of a theory-based HIV care enhancement and alcohol treatment intervention delivered by cell phone to patients in urban and rural areas. Engagement, retention, and adherence to care are necessary to achieve HIV suppression and antiretroviral therapy (ART) non-adherence can lead to treatment resistant genetic variants of HIV. People living with HIV often experience difficulty sustaining high-levels of treatment adherence and alcohol use is known to impede HIV care. Most factors that interfere with adherence to care are unanticipated and occur between clinical visits, including depression, ART side effects, and substance use. We will conduct a comparative effectiveness study to evaluate the implementation of a cell phone-delivered theory-based alcohol treatment and HIV care adherence counseling intervention. The intervention is grounded in the Behavioral Self-Regulation Model and utilizes brief cell phone counseling that includes monitoring adherence, provider support, and guided corrective feedback as well as interactive text message check-ins. This proactive approach with patients who drink is intended to increase engagement in care and facilitate reductions in drinking thereby improving retention to care and health outcomes. Brief counseling conducted via cell phones allows providers to detect and correct patient slippage from their care plan within a timeframe that can head-off missed appointments, ART non-adherence, and viral resistance. The intervention also includes interactive text (SMS) messaging that begins weekly and tappers off to further enhance engagement in care. Participants are 200 men and 200 women living in high-HIV prevalence remote communities who actively use alcohol and are receiving HIV treatment. Following screening, informed consent, and baseline assessments, participants will be allocated to either (a) the mobile alcohol behavioral self-regulation counseling enhancement to their usual care or (b) routine services provided in their usual care. Participants will be followed for 12-months post-intervention. The primary endpoints are retention to care, medication adherence assessed by unannounced pill counts and HIV RNA (viral load). The study will also evaluate the implementation processes including facilitators and barriers to engagement in care and a cost accounting of resources expended to achieve optimal outcomes. A team of internationally recognized experts in HIV treatment and behavioral research will form a working group to guide an in-depth implementation and cost evaluation. This study will inform the implementation of low-cost evidence-based care retention and adherence interventions in resource limited settings.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

2,040 studies on the registry are indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; 272 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 400 is above the median of 105 across 1,543 interventional studies indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome.

Browse Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Connecticut is the lead sponsor of 133 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • HIV positive Receiving clinical care New to care Or Returning to care or Not fully engaged in care

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HIV Negative Not receiving HIV care
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
400 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Phone Delivered

    Participants receive 5 sessions of phone-delivered behavioral counseling to improve HIV care.

    Behavioral: Behavioral self-regulation Phone counseling to improve HIV care

  • Active comparator
    Office Delivered

    Participants receive 5 sessions of office-delivered behavioral counseling to improve HIV care.

    Behavioral: Behavioral self-regulation Office counseling to improve HIV care

Interventions

  • BehavioralBehavioral self-regulation Phone counseling to improve HIV care

    Participants receive 5 sessions of behavioral counseling to improve HIV care. Counseling is delivered using phone calls by a trained adherence and care engagement counselor.

  • BehavioralBehavioral self-regulation Office counseling to improve HIV care

    Participants receive 5 sessions of behavioral counseling to improve HIV care. Counseling is delivered in clinical care offices s by a trained adherence and care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Engagement in care

    Number of participants with clinical appointments attended.

    Time frame: 12-months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Medication adherence

    Percent of medication taken as determined through phone-based medication adherence assessments.

    Time frame: 12-months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Share Project
    Atlanta, Georgia 30308, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 19, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04180280
Lead sponsor
University of Connecticut
Collaborators
Mercer University
Responsible party
Seth Kalichman (Professor, University of Connecticut) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 27, 2019
Start date
Jun 23, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2019
Completion
Nov 1, 2019
Last update
May 19, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion