CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04176406MCI_SubUpdated Jan 27, 2021Results posted

Using fMRI-guided TMS to Increase Central Executive Function in Older Adults (MCI_Sub)

An interventional study of rTMS and Sham rTMS in Mild Cognitive Impairment, sponsored by Duke University. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 55 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-27.

Sponsored by Duke University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Why this study was terminated
Covid-19, Funding ended
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
55 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an administrative supplement to an existing project "Using fMRI-guided TMS to increase central executive function in older adults: NCT02767323" This award allows extending our existing fMRI-TMS paradigm to patients with a prodromal form of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) known as amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and investigate the role of brain health factors in mediating the TMS-related memory performance benefits associated with communication between a network of frontoparietal brain regions in these populations.

The focus on focal neurostimulation at only a single site represents a fundamental gap in the approach of memory-based neurostimulation therapies. Neurostimulation affects multiple sites within a cortical network, but these global effects have not been used as targets for stimulation because of limited knowledge about what influence these localized sites have on global changes in brain state. To address this problem, multimodal neuroimaging tools and network modeling approaches developed though the parent U01 project will be used, to demonstrate how focal neurostimulation improves the efficacy of TMS for enhancing memory function. These goals will be addressed in the Administrative Supplement under our two specific aims. First, network-guided TMS will be applied to optimize memory success based in the frontoparietal network (FPN) in a new group of MCI patients. A new form of TMS targeting that involves modeling of the global network to understand how the controllability of a stimulation site evokes changes in widespread brain networks will be tested. Second, structural and functional factors affecting the efficacy of individualized network-guided TMS will be identified to ameliorate deficits in MCI. By creating a multimodal model of neural deficits related to MCI, network-guided TMS will be adjusted to demonstrate how the MCI brain might compensate for these neural deficits. The parent U01 project has made foundational advances towards these goals, as we have demonstrated the ability of to selectively enhance and reduce working memory performance in healthy older adults. In the current Administrative Supplement this paradigm will be extended to a group of MCI participants in order to test the hypothesis that excitatory rTMS to the working memory network can provide positive outcomes for patients with pre-clinical AD. The proposed work will provide an important tool for studying the stability and controllability of network connectivity of memory states in the aging brain, as well as new information on the effectiveness of brain stimulation technologies as a therapeutic approach for cognitive decline.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mild Cognitive Impairment
03

In context

Cognitive Dysfunction

3,843 studies on the registry are indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction; 1,100 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 65 across 2,808 interventional studies indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction.

Browse Cognitive Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,025 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.

Of its 194 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
55 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • English Speaking
  • willing to provide consent
  • signed HIPAA authorization
  • clinical consensus for MCI; and/or met inclusion criterial on MoCA, ApoE.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of any I DSM IV disorder that is unstable or untreated
  • current or past history of substance abuse or dependence (excluding nicotine)
  • women who are pregnant or breast feeding
  • intracranial implants (e.g. aneurysms clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes
  • increased risk of seizure for any reason, including prior diagnosis of epilepsy, seizure disorder, increased intracranial pressure, or history of significant head trauma greater than mild concussion (History of significant head trauma, including with loss of consciousness for ≥ 30 minutes, alteration of consciousness for up to 24 hours following the event, or post-traumatic amnesia) in the past 10yrs or head injury received after age 65
  • Neurological disorder including, but not limited to: space occupying brain lesion; any history of seizures, history of cerebrovascular accident; cerebral aneurysm , Dementia, Huntington chorea, multiple sclerosis
  • Increased risk of seizure for any reason, including prior diagnosis of increased intracranial pressure (such as after large infarctions or trauma), or currently taking medication that are on the strong potential hazard list for rTMS.
  • Subjects taking medications with an ACB score of 3.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    rTMS over a node within the fronto-parietal network

    excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be applied over a node within the fronto-parietal network, defined via network analysis.

    Device: rTMS

  • Sham comparator
    Sham rTMS over a node within the fronto-parietal network

    electrical sham coil applied over a node within the fronto-parietal network.

    Device: Sham rTMS

  • Active comparator
    rTMS over the DLPFC

    excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be applied over the dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex showing the strongest fMRI activation.

    Device: rTMS

  • Sham comparator
    Sham rTMS over the DLPFC

    electrical sham coil applied over the DLPFC.

    Device: Sham rTMS

Interventions

  • DevicerTMS

    excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used

  • DeviceSham rTMS

    an electrical sham coil reproducing the same clicking sound and tactile sensation than the active rTMS will be used

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Acute Effect of a rTMS Session on the Performance for a Working Memory Task, as Measured by Accuracy (in Percentage)

    Accuracy (in percentage) will be assessed to evaluate the acute effect of rTMS.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of one year

  2. Acute Effect of a rTMS Session on the Performance for a Working Memory Task, as Measured by Reaction Times (ms)

    Reaction times (in ms) will be assessed to evaluate the acute effect of rTMS

    Time frame: Through study completion an average of one year

07

Results

Posted Jan 11, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonerTMS Over a Node Within the Fronto-parietal NetworkSham rTMS Over a Node Within the Fronto-parietal NetworkrTMS Over the DLPFCSham rTMS Over the DLPFC
Started0000
Completed0000
Not completed0000

Outcome measures

PrimaryAcute Effect of a rTMS Session on the Performance for a Working Memory Task, as Measured by Accuracy (in Percentage)

Accuracy (in percentage) will be assessed to evaluate the acute effect of rTMS.

Time frame:
Through study completion, an average of one year

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryAcute Effect of a rTMS Session on the Performance for a Working Memory Task, as Measured by Reaction Times (ms)

Reaction times (in ms) will be assessed to evaluate the acute effect of rTMS

Time frame:
Through study completion an average of one year

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over adverse event data are collected during rTMS and a few minutes after.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
rTMS Over a Node Within the Fronto-parietal Network———
Sham rTMS Over a Node Within the Fronto-parietal Network———
rTMS Over the DLPFC———
Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC———

Baseline characteristics

These participants only performed the behavioral task. No TMS was applied.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Enrolled Participants
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years3
>=65 years7
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Enrolled Participants
Mean65.2 ± 6.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Enrolled Participants
Female5
Male5
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Enrolled Participants
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American2
White8
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Enrolled Participants
United States10
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27705, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 1, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 27, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04176406
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 25, 2019
Start date
Nov 25, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 27, 2020
Completion
Feb 27, 2020
Results posted
Jan 11, 2021
Last update
Jan 27, 2021

Study contacts

Lawrence G Appelbaum
principal investigator · Duke University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion