CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04175509Updated Jan 20, 2022Results posted

Improving Post-Operative Pain and Recovery in Gynecologic Surgery

A Phase 4 interventional study of Rectal acetaminophen and Intravenous acetaminophen in Postoperative Pain, Opioid Use and Acetaminophen, sponsored by Aultman Health Foundation. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-20.

Sponsored by Aultman Health Foundation · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This is a clinical investigation to determine the efficacy of rectal versus intravenous acetaminophen in patients undergoing a minimally invasive hysterectomy. All women will receive acetaminophen either rectally or intravenously immediately postoperative, prior to extubation. Patient's will be randomly assigned to either the rectal acetaminophen or the intravenous acetaminophen group. Patient outcomes will be measured through a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0-10 for pain scores, and total opioid consumption measured in morphine milligram equivalent (MME) for the first 24 hours following surgery, or upon discharge, whichever comes first.

Read the detailed description

Patient's undergoing major gynecologic surgery require effective postoperative pain management in order to enhance recovery and ultimately allow patients to return to their preoperative functional state. Traditionally, acute postoperative pain control has been achieved largely with the use of opioid medications. Excessive use of opioids can have adverse effects on the recovery process. Side effects include, but are not limited to dizziness, sedation, nausea/vomiting, respiratory depression, euphoria, constipation, and abuse. In addition, opioid monotherapy can delay post-operative ambulation, contribute to prolonged hospital stay and resumption of activities of daily living, and furthermore, have long-term sequelae for individuals as well as society at whole.

Over the past decade, a multimodal approach to pain management has been explored in attempts to optimally treat acute postoperative pain. This approach is one of the keys to improving the recovery process.

Acetaminophen is a non-opioid analgesic with a well-established safety and tolerability profile that is commonly used in multimodal approach to treating surgical pain. It is available in oral, rectal and Intravenous (IV) formulation. IV acetaminophen in particular is increasingly used for pain control after surgery as it has demonstrated a significant analgesic benefit in a variety of surgery types by reduction in pain intensity while decreasing total opioid use. Many studies have evaluated the efficacy of acetaminophen based on route of administration. A systematic review demonstrated that there is no clear indication for intravenous acetaminophen for patients who can tolerate an oral dosage as there was no difference if efficacy outcomes. This is valuable information as the cost of IV acetaminophen is exponentially more than the oral form. Although the oral form of acetaminophen is as efficient as controlling pain when compared to IV, and is notably cheaper, it is not the best option for the nauseated patient or patients whom are restricted from oral intake following surgery. Rectal acetaminophen is therefore a feasible alternative option in such patients.

Data on the use of rectal acetaminophen in adults for postoperative pain management is limited. Pettersson and colleagues (2005) compared oral, rectal and IV paracetamol in day surgery patients. Although they demonstrated significantly higher plasma paracetamol concentrations in patients who received oral and IV formations at multiple time points, there was no difference in pain ratings. In another study, rectal paracetamol was shown to have a significant morphine-sparing effect after hysterectomy.

At this time, there has been no study in the gynecologic literature to compare IV to rectal acetaminophen in terms of pain control and effect on overall opioid use in the acute post-operative period.

The rationale for this study is to determine the optimal way of managing post-operative pain in gynecologic surgery in attempt to improve the overall recovery process. More specifically, this study will determine if the route of administration of acetaminophen has an effect on post-operative pain and use of opioid medication following a minimally invasive hysterectomy. The results of this study may guide post-operative pain management after gynecologic surgery, and help limit the amount of opioid use, while potentially reducing pharmacological costs for patients and hospitals.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pain
  • Opioid Use
  • Acetaminophen

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Postoperative Pain
  • Minimally-invasive Hysterectomy
  • Opioid Use
  • Acetaminophen
  • Hysterectomy
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,137 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 75 across 4,341 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Aultman Health Foundation is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Willing to consent
  • Amendable to receive either rectal or intravenous acetaminophen
  • Planned hospital stay for at least 24 hours.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to provide informed consent
  • Patients with a history of regular opioid use prior to surgery based on their current home medication list
  • Patients who have required regular opioid intake for the 7 days preceding surgery
  • Patients with known hypersensitivity to acetaminophen
  • Patients with a baseline preoperative liver function enzymes (AST and ALT) that are greater than twice the upper limits
  • Unable to complete procedure as planned.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Rectal acetaminophen

    Patients will receive two 650mg suppositories rectally of acetaminophen for a total dose of 1300mg at the end of surgery.

    Drug: Rectal acetaminophen

  • Active comparator
    Intravenous acetaminophen

    Patients will receive one dose of 1000mg of acetaminophen, administered intravenously, at the end of surgery.

    Drug: Intravenous acetaminophen

Interventions

  • DrugRectal acetaminophen

    Rectal 1300mg

  • DrugIntravenous acetaminophen

    Intravenous 1000mg

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain: Standardized Pain Scale

    Post-operative pain control using a standardized pain scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse pain) measured every 4 hours for the 24 hours, or discharge, whichever comes first. Time points were averaged for each participate and reported as a single value.

    Time frame: The first 24 hours following surgery, or upon discharge, whichever comes first.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Opioid Use

    Total amount of opioid rescue calculated by converting all opiates to Morphine Milligram Equivalents in the first 24 hours following surgery, or upon discharge, whichever comes first.

    Time frame: The first 24 hours following surgery, or upon discharge, whichever comes first.

Other outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain: Standardized Pain Scale

    Post-operative pain control using a standardized pain scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse pain) for the first 6 hours after surgery. Time points were averaged for each participate and reported as a single value.

    Time frame: The first 6 hours following surgery

  2. Postoperative Pain: Standardized Pain Scale

    Post-operative pain control using a standardized pain scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse pain) for the first 12 hours after surgery. Time points were averaged for each participate and reported as a single value.

    Time frame: The 12 hours following surgery

  3. Opioid Use

    Total amount of opioid rescue calculated by converting all opiates to Morphine Milligram Equivalents in the first 6 hours following surgery

    Time frame: The first 6 hours following surgery

  4. Opioid Use

    Total amount of opioid rescue calculated by converting all opiates to Morphine Milligram Equivalents in the first 12 hours following surgery

    Time frame: The first 12 hours following surgery

  5. Estimated Blood Loss

    Total estimated blood loss in millilitres for the surgery

    Time frame: During the duration of the surgery, from start to end time, on average 1.5 hours

  6. Operative Time

    Operative time in minutes determined by the operating room record

    Time frame: From the start to end of the surgery

07

Results

Posted Aug 19, 2021
Limitations and caveats
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many patients were prohibited to stay overnight in the hospital. Therefore, many patients were discharged home before 24 hours after surgery. This is primarily why the primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed at shorter time intervals (6 hours post-op and 12 hours-op) as well.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRectal AcetaminophenIntravenous Acetaminophen
Started1921
Completed1719
Not completed22

Outcome measures

PrimaryPostoperative Pain: Standardized Pain Scale

Post-operative pain control using a standardized pain scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse pain) measured every 4 hours for the 24 hours, or discharge, whichever comes first. Time points were averaged for each participate and reported as a single value.

Time frame:
The first 24 hours following surgery, or upon discharge, whichever comes first.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Postoperative Pain: Standardized Pain Scale
score on a scaleRectal AcetaminophenIntravenous Acetaminophen
Postoperative Pain: Standardized Pain Scale2.82 ± 1.113.18 ± 1.26
Statistical analysis
  • Rectal Acetaminophen vs Intravenous Acetaminophen · t-test, 2 sided · p = .378
SecondaryOpioid Use

Total amount of opioid rescue calculated by converting all opiates to Morphine Milligram Equivalents in the first 24 hours following surgery, or upon discharge, whichever comes first.

Time frame:
The first 24 hours following surgery, or upon discharge, whichever comes first.
Reported as:
Mean · Morphine Milligram Equivalents
Opioid Use
Morphine Milligram EquivalentsRectal AcetaminophenIntravenous Acetaminophen
Opioid Use25.75 ± 20.0923.71 ± 18.46
Statistical analysis
  • Rectal Acetaminophen vs Intravenous Acetaminophen · t-test, 2 sided · p = .753
Other pre-specifiedPostoperative Pain: Standardized Pain Scale

Post-operative pain control using a standardized pain scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse pain) for the first 6 hours after surgery. Time points were averaged for each participate and reported as a single value.

Time frame:
The first 6 hours following surgery
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Postoperative Pain: Standardized Pain Scale
score on a scaleRectal AcetaminophenIntravenous Acetaminophen
Postoperative Pain: Standardized Pain Scale3.13 ± 1.361.36 ± 1.78
Statistical analysis
  • Rectal Acetaminophen vs Intravenous Acetaminophen · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.30
Other pre-specifiedPostoperative Pain: Standardized Pain Scale

Post-operative pain control using a standardized pain scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse pain) for the first 12 hours after surgery. Time points were averaged for each participate and reported as a single value.

Time frame:
The 12 hours following surgery
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Postoperative Pain: Standardized Pain Scale
score on a scaleRectal AcetaminophenIntravenous Acetaminophen
Postoperative Pain: Standardized Pain Scale2.99 ± 1.203.36 ± 1.43
Statistical analysis
  • Rectal Acetaminophen vs Intravenous Acetaminophen · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.43
Other pre-specifiedOpioid Use

Total amount of opioid rescue calculated by converting all opiates to Morphine Milligram Equivalents in the first 6 hours following surgery

Time frame:
The first 6 hours following surgery
Reported as:
Mean · Morphine Milligram Equivalents
Opioid Use
Morphine Milligram EquivalentsRectal AcetaminophenIntravenous Acetaminophen
Opioid Use6.74 ± 7.497.97 ± 6.28
Statistical analysis
  • Rectal Acetaminophen vs Intravenous Acetaminophen · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.61
Other pre-specifiedOpioid Use

Total amount of opioid rescue calculated by converting all opiates to Morphine Milligram Equivalents in the first 12 hours following surgery

Time frame:
The first 12 hours following surgery
Reported as:
Mean · Morphine Milligram Equivalents
Opioid Use
Morphine Milligram EquivalentsRectal AcetaminophenIntravenous Acetaminophen
Opioid Use15.52 ± 13.3514.17 ± 11.87
Statistical analysis
  • Rectal Acetaminophen vs Intravenous Acetaminophen · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.77
Other pre-specifiedEstimated Blood Loss

Total estimated blood loss in millilitres for the surgery

Time frame:
During the duration of the surgery, from start to end time, on average 1.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · Millilitres
Estimated Blood Loss
MillilitresRectal AcetaminophenIntravenous Acetaminophen
Estimated Blood Loss273.53 ± 138.20347.37 ± 75.41
Statistical analysis
  • Rectal Acetaminophen vs Intravenous Acetaminophen · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.48
Other pre-specifiedOperative Time

Operative time in minutes determined by the operating room record

Time frame:
From the start to end of the surgery
Reported as:
Mean · Minutes
Operative Time
MinutesRectal AcetaminophenIntravenous Acetaminophen
Operative Time88.71 ± 24.2290.89 ± 21.97
Statistical analysis
  • Rectal Acetaminophen vs Intravenous Acetaminophen · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.78

Adverse events

Collected over From administration of acetaminophen until discharge from the hospital, up to 24 hours.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Rectal Acetaminophen0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)
Intravenous Acetaminophen0/21 (0%)0/21 (0%)0/21 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Rectal AcetaminophenIntravenous AcetaminophenTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years141731
>=65 years325
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Rectal AcetaminophenIntravenous AcetaminophenTotal
Mean50.53 ± 13.6452.37 ± 14.0851.50 ± 13.70
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Rectal AcetaminophenIntravenous AcetaminophenTotal
Female171936
Male000
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Rectal AcetaminophenIntravenous AcetaminophenTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Rectal AcetaminophenIntravenous AcetaminophenTotal
United States171936
Indication for hysterectomy
Indication for hysterectomy(Participants)Rectal AcetaminophenIntravenous AcetaminophenTotal
Benign111223
Malignant6713
Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes Mellitus(Participants)Rectal AcetaminophenIntravenous AcetaminophenTotal
Count of participants415
Hypertension
Hypertension(Participants)Rectal AcetaminophenIntravenous AcetaminophenTotal
Count of participants10717

5 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Aultman Hospital
    Canton, Ohio 44710, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Cao X, et al. Effect of intraoperative or postoperative intravenous acetaminophen on postoperative pain scores and opioid requirements in abdominal and spinal surgery patients. Int J Clin Exp Med 11(4)4120-4125, 2018.
  • Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Rosenberg JM, Bickler S, Brennan T, Carter T, Cassidy CL, Chittenden EH, Degenhardt E, Griffith S, Manworren R, McCarberg B, Montgomery R, Murphy J, Perkal MF, Suresh S, Sluka K, Strassels S, Thirlby R, Viscusi E, Walco GA, Warner L, Weisman SJ, Wu CL. Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):131-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008. Erratum In: J Pain. 2016 Apr;17(4):508-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.02.002.. Dosage error in article text. PubMed 26827847 ↗
  • Sconzo Jr FR, Ramamoorthy S. The role of multimodal analgesia in colorectal surgery: a review of clinical data and case-based presentations featuring Ofirmev (acetaminophen) injections. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 58(2):1-15, 2015.
  • Jibril F, Sharaby S, Mohamed A, Wilby KJ. Intravenous versus Oral Acetaminophen for Pain: Systematic Review of Current Evidence to Support Clinical Decision-Making. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015 May-Jun;68(3):238-47. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v68i3.1458. PubMed 26157186 ↗
  • Petterson PH, Hein A, Owall A, Anderson RE, Jakobsson JG. Early bioavailability in day surgery: a comparison between orally, rectally, and intravenously administered paracetamol. J. of Ambulatory Surgery 12:27-30, 2005.
  • Cobby TF, Crighton IM, Kyriakides K, Hobbs GJ. Rectal paracetamol has a significant morphine-sparing effect after hysterectomy. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Aug;83(2):253-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/83.2.253. PubMed 10618939 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 12, 2019
  • Informed consent form · Oct 28, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 20, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04175509
Lead sponsor
Aultman Health Foundation
Responsible party
Michaela Beynon (Principal Investigator, Aultman Health Foundation) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 25, 2019
Start date
Dec 23, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2021
Completion
Jun 1, 2021
Results posted
Aug 19, 2021
Last update
Jan 20, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion