CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02620384MELT-HFUpdated Feb 15, 2019Results posted

Metolazone As Early Add On Therapy For Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (MELT-HF)--A Single Center Pilot Study.

A Phase 3 interventional study of Experimental: Placebo and Experimental: Metolazone in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure, sponsored by Aultman Health Foundation. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-15.

Sponsored by Aultman Health Foundation · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Limited resources available to met accrual goal.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
147
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of the study is to determine efficacy of metolazone as synergistic therapy with Lasix in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. This will be a single center double blinded randomized placebo- controlled pilot study of the addition of 5 mg of metolazone per day for 2 days compared to placebo in patients admitted with acute decompensated heart failure.

Read the detailed description

Heart failure is a major source of morbidity, mortality and growing public health cost. In US, the number of congestive heart failure patients is more than 4 million with more than 550,000 new annually reported cases. The annual cost of heart failure management exceeds 35 billion dollars per year.The heart failure readmissions and average length of hospital stay cost approximately $11,000 per patient.

Loop diuretics are used alone in the majority of cases to promote diuresis. An association of increased creatinine and increased risk of renal dysfunction, the cardiorenal syndrome, in the face of high dose loop diuretics has raised questions regarding the safety and toxicity of high dose loop diuretics. While the dose of diuretics is ubiquitous, little data exists to guide their use and many clinicians are uncertain as to when and how to initiate and limit therapy.

Prospective randomized data on large number of decompensated heart failure patients receiving metolazone in addition to standard therapy is scarce and needs further definitive evaluation in terms of clinical outcomes and safety. In many cases, a "stepped approach" with oral loop diuretics advancing to intravenous and finally combination high dose diuretics is employed.

Primary endpoint: Total urinary output and negative fluid balance in millilitres (ml) at 48 hours following first dose of intravenous diuretic.

Secondary endpoints:

  1. Change in weight from admission to day 2.
  2. Degree of improvement in dyspnea at 6,12, 24,36, and 48 hours assessed with Modified Borg Scale (1-10)
  3. All cause mortality at 30 days.

This is a single center study of at least 200 patients who are admitted to Aultman Hospital with clinical decompensated congestive heart failure ( NYHA III-IV). It is a double blinded randomized placebo- controlled pilot study of the addition of 5 mg of metolazone per day for 2 days compared to placebo in patients admitted with acute decompensated heart failure. We will compare a strategy of early institution of metolazone with standard of care in patients admitted with decompensated heart failure and volume overload. All patients will receive standard heart failure therapy, including but not restricted to diuretics, digoxin, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta blockers, aldosterone antagonists, hydralazine, and/or nitrates, at the discretion of the treating physician.

After informed consent is obtained, patients will be randomized 1:1 to the treatment arm or placebo arm. Two additional doses of metolazone within 6 and 24 hours of administration of standard intravenous diuretics will be given to the treatment arm. Patients and physicians will be blinded to the administered drug (metolazone vs placebo).Drug will be distributed by pharmacy when a patient is consented and enrolled in the trial. Specific guidance/recommendations regarding diuretic therapy will be provided (documented in detail below) but will be at the discretion of the treating physician. We will collect data on demographics, co-morbidities, clinical presentations and outcomes with metolazone administration with patient follow up at one week (+3) and 30 (±7) days post discharge.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Metolazone
  • Heart Failure
03

In context

Heart Failure

5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,220 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 147 is above the median of 72 across 3,736 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Aultman Health Foundation is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Current hospitalization for chronic congestive heart failure with admission up to 48 hours prior to inclusion.
  • Chronic heart failure will be defined as requiring treatment for a minimum of 30 days prior to current admission, NYHA Class III or IV at the time of hospitalization, and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% within one year or evidence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and evidence of diastolic dysfunction on echocardiogram.
  • Admitted with clinical decompensated heart failure based on history, physical exam, and parameters indicating extracellular volume expansion such as including JVP ≥ 8 cm of water and 1+ or greater peripheral edema
  • Is able to be dosed with study medication within six (6) hours of first dose of IV diuretics

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Baseline severe hypotension (Mean arterial pressure \< 55 mm Hg)
  • Creatinine clearance less than 20 ml/min or creatinine greater than 2.5 mg/dl.
  • Serum sodium less than 128 meq/L.
  • Serum Potassium \< 3.0 meq/L.
  • Known adverse reaction to metolazone
  • Inability to take oral medications
  • Severe Aortic Stenosis (AVA \< 0.8cm2)
  • History of Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
  • Metastatic Carcinoma per history
  • Severe COPD, FEV \< 1L
  • Severe dyspnea requiring prolonged CPAP,BIPAP or intubation
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
147 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Experimental: Placebo

    This group will receive all standard heart failure therapy and placebo pill.

    Drug: Experimental: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Experimental: Metolazone

    This group will receive all standard heart failure therapy with addition of metolazone.

    Drug: Experimental: Metolazone

Interventions

  • DrugExperimental: Placebo

    All patients will receive standard heart failure therapy, including but not restricted to diuretics, digoxin, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta blockers, aldosterone antagonists, hydralazine, and/or nitrates, at the discretion of the treating physician. After informed consent is obtained, patients will be randomized 1:1 to the treatment arm or placebo arm. The first placebo dose is given within six hours of admininstration of first dose of intravenous diuretic. The second placebo dose is given at 24-hours after the first dose.

  • DrugExperimental: Metolazone

    All patients will receive standard heart failure therapy, including but not restricted to diuretics, digoxin, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta blockers, aldosterone antagonists, hydralazine, and/or nitrates, at the discretion of the treating physician. After informed consent is obtained, patients will be randomized 1:1 to the treatment arm or placebo arm. The first dose of metolazone is given within six hours of admininstration of first dose of intravenous diuretic The second dose of metolazone is given 24-hours after the first dose.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Urinary Output at 48 Hours

    Total urinary output in milliliters (ml) at 48 hours. Measurement timing began with administration of first dose of investigational product, ended 48 hours later.

    Time frame: 48 hours

  2. Fluid Balance at 48 Hours

    Difference in value between input and output in milliliters (ml) at 48 hours. Measurement timing began with administration of first dose of investigational product, ended 48 hours later. Fluid balance = Fluid in minus Fluid out.

    Time frame: 48 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Weight First 48 Hours

    Change in weight from the date/time of study enrollment (baseline) and 48 hours.

    Time frame: 48 hours

  2. Degree of Improvement in Dyspnea at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 Hours.

    Dyspnea assessed at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours with Modified Borg Scale (1-10). Range is from 1 (very slight) to 10 (maximal) dyspnea.

    Time frame: 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours.

  3. Total Dose Diuretics First 48 Hours

    Total dosage loop diuretic in first 48 hours using conversion tool to calculate intravenous Lasix equivalence

    Time frame: 48 hours

  4. Number of Participants With Inotrope Administration During First 48 Hours

    Number of Participants with Inotrope administration during first 48 hours following study enrollment.

    Time frame: 48 hours

  5. All Cause Mortality at 30 Days

    All Cause Mortality at 30 Days

    Time frame: 30 Days

Other outcomes

  1. Length of Hospital Stay

    Length of hospital stay in days

    Time frame: Inpatient Hospitalization

  2. All Cause Readmission Within 30 Days

    All Cause Readmission Within 30 Days

    Time frame: 30 Days

  3. Heart Failure Readmission Within 30 Days

    Heart Failure Readmission Within 30 Days

    Time frame: 30 Days

  4. Number of Participants With Potassium Electrolyte Abnormality Requiring Replacement

    Severe electrolyte abnormalities requiring aggressive replacement defined as potassium levels less than 3.0 meq/L during the study.

    Time frame: 48 Hours

  5. Number of Participants With Magnesium Electrolyte Abnormality Requiring Replacement

    Number of Participants with severe electrolyte abnormalities requiring aggressive replacement defined as magnesium levels less than 1.5 meq/L during the study.

    Time frame: 48 Hours

07

Results

Posted Feb 15, 2019
Limitations and caveats
Recruitment ended early due to limited resources,however all protocol directed measures were completed for all enrolled. I\&O was measured and recorded manually which introduces room for error.BORG assessment timing not exact due to limited resources.

Participant flow

147 participants from one local institution (inpatient hospital) were enrolled between October 2015 and November 2017

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneExperimental: PlaceboExperimental: Metolazone
Started7073
Completed6666
Not completed47
Withdrew: Adverse event21
Withdrew: Discharged prior to 2nd dose25
Withdrew: Drug shortage prevented 2nd dose01

Outcome measures

PrimaryTotal Urinary Output at 48 Hours

Total urinary output in milliliters (ml) at 48 hours. Measurement timing began with administration of first dose of investigational product, ended 48 hours later.

Time frame:
48 hours
Reported as:
Mean · Milliliters
Total Urinary Output at 48 Hours
MillilitersExperimental: PlaceboExperimental: Metolazone
Total Urinary Output at 48 Hours6893.777 ± 3122.65329333.288 ± 4188.5731
Statistical analysis
  • Experimental: Placebo vs Experimental: Metolazone · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 2439.5110 · 95% CI 1160.8485 to 3718.1734
PrimaryFluid Balance at 48 Hours

Difference in value between input and output in milliliters (ml) at 48 hours. Measurement timing began with administration of first dose of investigational product, ended 48 hours later. Fluid balance = Fluid in minus Fluid out.

Time frame:
48 hours
Reported as:
Mean · Mililiters
Fluid Balance at 48 Hours
MililitersExperimental: PlaceboExperimental: Metolazone
Fluid Balance at 48 Hours-4260.762 ± 2705.8710-6510.091 ± 4121.3808
Statistical analysis
  • Experimental: Placebo vs Experimental: Metolazone · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): -2249.3294 · 95% CI -3454.4999 to -1044.1589
SecondaryChange in Weight First 48 Hours

Change in weight from the date/time of study enrollment (baseline) and 48 hours.

Time frame:
48 hours
Reported as:
Mean · killograms
Change in Weight First 48 Hours
killogramsExperimental: PlaceboExperimental: Metolazone
Change in Weight First 48 Hours-3.23227 ± 2.538462-5.93939 ± 4.033661
Statistical analysis
  • Experimental: Placebo vs Experimental: Metolazone · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): -2.717121 · 95% CI -3.8637732 to -1.546510
SecondaryDegree of Improvement in Dyspnea at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 Hours.

Dyspnea assessed at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours with Modified Borg Scale (1-10). Range is from 1 (very slight) to 10 (maximal) dyspnea.

Time frame:
6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Degree of Improvement in Dyspnea at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 Hours.
score on a scaleExperimental: PlaceboExperimental: Metolazone
Baseline9 ± .00009 ± .0000
6 hours6.21 ± 1.5245.49 ± 1.532
12 hours4.88 ± 1.5643.98 ± 1.441
24 hours3.77 ± 1.6622.95 ± 1.643
36 hours2.924 ± 1.62492.123 ± 1.5663
48 hours2.295 ± 1.66401.600 ± 1.5441
Statistical analysis
  • Experimental: Placebo vs Experimental: Metolazone · t-test, 2 sided · p = .014 (Represents BORG_48_hours) · Mean difference (final values): -.6955 · 95% CI -1.2506 to -.1403Method of estimation is for 48 hour measure.
SecondaryTotal Dose Diuretics First 48 Hours

Total dosage loop diuretic in first 48 hours using conversion tool to calculate intravenous Lasix equivalence

Time frame:
48 hours
Reported as:
Mean · Milligrams
Total Dose Diuretics First 48 Hours
MilligramsExperimental: PlaceboExperimental: Metolazone
Total Dose Diuretics First 48 Hours346.470 ± 381.9480350.160 ± 444.8640
Statistical analysis
  • Experimental: Placebo vs Experimental: Metolazone · t-test, 2 sided · p = .959 · Mean difference (final values): 3.6903 · 95% CI -1395694 to 147.1545
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Inotrope Administration During First 48 Hours

Number of Participants with Inotrope administration during first 48 hours following study enrollment.

Time frame:
48 hours
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Inotrope Administration During First 48 Hours
ParticipantsExperimental: PlaceboExperimental: Metolazone
Number of Participants With Inotrope Administration During First 48 Hours94
Statistical analysis
  • Experimental: Placebo vs Experimental: Metolazone · Chi-squared · p = .144
SecondaryAll Cause Mortality at 30 Days

All Cause Mortality at 30 Days

Time frame:
30 Days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
All Cause Mortality at 30 Days
ParticipantsExperimental: PlaceboExperimental: Metolazone
All Cause Mortality at 30 Days14
Statistical analysis
  • Experimental: Placebo vs Experimental: Metolazone · Chi-squared · p = .171
Other pre-specifiedLength of Hospital Stay

Length of hospital stay in days

Time frame:
Inpatient Hospitalization
Reported as:
Mean · days
Length of Hospital Stay
daysExperimental: PlaceboExperimental: Metolazone
Length of Hospital Stay5.33 ± 4.6955.44 ± 3.672
Statistical analysis
  • Experimental: Placebo vs Experimental: Metolazone · t-test, 2 sided · p = .885 · Mean difference (final values): .106 · 95% CI -1.346 to 1.558
Other pre-specifiedAll Cause Readmission Within 30 Days

All Cause Readmission Within 30 Days

Time frame:
30 Days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
All Cause Readmission Within 30 Days
ParticipantsExperimental: PlaceboExperimental: Metolazone
All Cause Readmission Within 30 Days109
Statistical analysis
  • Experimental: Placebo vs Experimental: Metolazone · Chi-squared · p = .804
Other pre-specifiedHeart Failure Readmission Within 30 Days

Heart Failure Readmission Within 30 Days

Time frame:
30 Days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Heart Failure Readmission Within 30 Days
ParticipantsExperimental: PlaceboExperimental: Metolazone
Heart Failure Readmission Within 30 Days24
Statistical analysis
  • Experimental: Placebo vs Experimental: Metolazone · Chi-squared · p = .403
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Potassium Electrolyte Abnormality Requiring Replacement

Severe electrolyte abnormalities requiring aggressive replacement defined as potassium levels less than 3.0 meq/L during the study.

Time frame:
48 Hours
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Potassium Electrolyte Abnormality Requiring Replacement
ParticipantsExperimental: PlaceboExperimental: Metolazone
Number of Participants With Potassium Electrolyte Abnormality Requiring Replacement03
Statistical analysis
  • Experimental: Placebo vs Experimental: Metolazone · Chi-squared · p = .080
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Magnesium Electrolyte Abnormality Requiring Replacement

Number of Participants with severe electrolyte abnormalities requiring aggressive replacement defined as magnesium levels less than 1.5 meq/L during the study.

Time frame:
48 Hours
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Magnesium Electrolyte Abnormality Requiring Replacement
ParticipantsExperimental: PlaceboExperimental: Metolazone
Number of Participants With Magnesium Electrolyte Abnormality Requiring Replacement21
Statistical analysis
  • Experimental: Placebo vs Experimental: Metolazone · Chi-squared · p = .559

Adverse events

Collected over Serious and non-serious adverse effects will be collected for the first 48 hours following enrollment in the MELT trial. No other adverse events are reported unless deemed to related to the study by the Principal Investigator. All cause mortality was assessed and reported for all patients at the 30 day timepoint following study enrollment. Study design did not require collection of mortality data past the 30 day timepoint.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Experimental: Placebo1/70 (1.4%)0/70 (0%)13/70 (18.6%)
Experimental: Metolazone4/72 (5.6%)0/72 (0%)15/72 (20.8%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventExperimental: PlaceboExperimental: Metolazone
Acute Kidney InjuryRenal and urinary disorders4/7010/72
Hypotension Requiring InterventionCardiac disorders6/701/72
Electrolyte abnormalities requiring interventionGeneral disorders2/704/72
Hypotention requiring intervention and Acute Kidney InjuryGeneral disorders1/700/72

Baseline characteristics

Per protocol only participants who receive both doses of investigational product are analyzed

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Experimental: PlaceboExperimental: MetolazoneTotal
Mean73.67 ± 13.571.86 ± 12.872.77 ± 13.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Experimental: PlaceboExperimental: MetolazoneTotal
Female262955
Male403777
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Experimental: PlaceboExperimental: MetolazoneTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American325
White6364127
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Experimental: PlaceboExperimental: MetolazoneTotal
United States6666132
NYHA Class at Enrollment
NYHA Class at Enrollment(participants)Experimental: PlaceboExperimental: MetolazoneTotal
Class 3282553
Class 4384179
N-Terminal proBNP Value Upon Admission
N-Terminal proBNP Value Upon Admission(pg/mL)Experimental: PlaceboExperimental: MetolazoneTotal
Mean10905.6 ± 12749.910184.7 ± 11340.110545.12 ± 12024.2
Time Difference Qualifying Diuretic and Study Drug Initiation
Time Difference Qualifying Diuretic and Study Drug Initiation(minutes)Experimental: PlaceboExperimental: MetolazoneTotal
Mean147.7 ± 147.7121.3 ± 112.9132.5 ± 114.3
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Aultman Health Foundation
    Canton, Ohio 44710, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jan 17, 2017
  • Statistical analysis plan · Dec 4, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 15, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02620384
Lead sponsor
Aultman Health Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 3, 2015
Start date
Oct 1, 2015
Primary completion
Nov 29, 2017
Completion
Dec 29, 2017
Results posted
Feb 15, 2019
Last update
Feb 15, 2019

Study contacts

Muhammad Chaudhry, MD
principal investigator · Aultman Health Foundation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion