CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04174313VILIVORTEXUpdated Aug 30, 2021Results posted

Ventilator-induced Lung Injury Vortex in Patients With SARS-CoV-2

An observational study in ARDS, Mechanical Ventilation Complication and Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, sponsored by Hospital El Cruce. Completed at 1 site in Argentina. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-30.

Sponsored by Hospital El Cruce · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
65
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The concept of Ventilator-induced Lung Injury Vortex (VILI vortex) has recently been proposed as a progressive lung injury mechanism in which the alveolar stress/strain increases as the ventilable lung "shrinks" (1). This positive feedback inexorably leads to the acceleration of lung damage, with potentially irreversible results. Little is known about the clinical aspects of this condition. Understanding its behavior could contribute to changing its potential devastating impact.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence of VILI vortex in patients with acute respiratory syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID-19, to establish a connection between this phenomenon and mortality, and to identify the factors that have an impact on its development.

Read the detailed description

Mechanical ventilation is an essential tool for the treatment of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, as with other strategies, it is not free of complications. Inadequate ventilation may have a negative impact on pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics, and it could both cause structural damage to pulmonary parenchyma and activate inflammation (2). This process is known as ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and may promote the development of multiple organ failure and, eventually, death.

VILI results from the interaction between the mechanical load applied to the ventilable lung and its capacity to tolerate it. Factors such as tidal volume (Vt), driving pressure (ΔP), inspiratory flow rate (VI), respiratory rate (RR), excessive inspiratory effort, high levels of FiO2 and, in some cases, PEEP, have been involved in damage mechanism. In that sense, the concept of mechanical power (MP) tries to encompass most of these factors within a measurable unit (3). Furthermore, the decrease in ventilable lung volume (baby lung concept), the heterogeneous lung compromise in ARDS), and the presence of cofactors that have a negative impact on the lung (fluid overload, presence of sepsis or shock) could increase its susceptibility to damage (4-5).

Due to the fact that the mechanical conditions of the lung change dynamically with the progression of the disease, the ventilatory strategy needs constant adjustments in order to maintain a balance between the load and the size of the ventilable lung (concept of ergonomic ventilation). In fact, a protective ventilatory strategy of low tidal volume (Vt: 6 ml/kg/PBW) and limited plateau pressure (PPlat \<30 cmH2O) may cause damage if the functional residual capacity (FRC) decreases significantly, thus making a lower number of alveoli (including capillaries) withstand a higher mechanical load per unit.

The concept of VILI vortex has recently been proposed as a progressive lung injury mechanism in which the alveolar stress/strain increases as the ventilable lung "shrinks". This positive feedback inexorably leads to the acceleration of lung damage, with potentially irreversible results (1). Little is known about the clinical aspects of this condition. Understanding its behavior could contribute to changing its potential devastating impact.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence of VILI vortex in patients with ARDS secondary to COVID-19, to establish a connection between this phenomenon and mortality, and to identify the factors that have an impact on its development.

02

Conditions studied

  • ARDS
  • Mechanical Ventilation Complication
  • Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury
03

In context

Lung Injury

399 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Injury; 50 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 65 is close to the median of 70 across 136 observational studies indexed under Lung Injury.

Browse Lung Injury studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital El Cruce is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with SARS-CoV-2 in mechanical ventilation

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: ARDS

-

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders and pregnant women. Cardiac arrest before ICU admission. Extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) requirement within the first 24 h of ICU admission and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with gold class 3 or 4, or home oxygen therapy

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
65 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • VILI VORTEX and No VILI VORTEX

    Measurement of pulmonary pressures and volumes in the same patient

    Diagnostic Test: CT scan

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testCT scan

    Mechanical variables and PaO2/FiO2 were registered daily for 14 days or until initiating assisted ventilation. These data were obtained in passive mechanical conditions. Ventilator-induced lung injury vortex was defined as a progressive increase in driving pressure (ΔP) as Vt remained constant or even decreased. Refractory hypoxemia was defined as PaO2/FiO2 \<100 despite the optimization of mechanical ventilation and prone positioning.

    Also known as: Transpulmonary pressures (TP) will be measured

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Who Survived and Died

    The number of patients who died and survived was compared between patients with SARS-CoV-2 who progressed with VILI VORTEX and without VILI VORTEX)

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. Number of Patients With and Without Refractory Hypoxemia

    The number of patients that evolved with refractory hypoxemia was compared between the patients with SARS-CoV-2 that evolved with VILI VORTEX and without VILI VORTEX) Refractory hypoxemia was defined as PaO2/FiO2 \<100 despite the optimization of mechanical ventilation and prone positioning.

    Time frame: 90 days

  3. Number of Patients With Complications

    The following variables and complications were also observed during the period of analysis: incidence of pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation, need for noradrenaline over 0.1 γ/kg/min for more than 24 h, positive blood cultures, accumulated fluid balance, dialysis treatment, clinical and/or echocardiographic evidence of heart failure, lactate ≥2 mmol/L in at least two consecutive samples, presence of persistent fever (≥38º at least once a day for three consecutive days), and the highest value of ferritin, D-dimer, C-reactive protein, troponin I and LDH obtained during the first 14 days of invasive mechanical ventilation. VILI vortex patients had positive blood cultures, moderate to severe shock, persistent fever and fluid balance was considerably more positive.

    Time frame: 90 days

07

Results

Posted Aug 30, 2021

Participant flow

Patients were recruited between March 2020 to March 2021

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneVILI VORTEXNO VILI VORTEX
Started1550
Completed1550
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Survived and Died

The number of patients who died and survived was compared between patients with SARS-CoV-2 who progressed with VILI VORTEX and without VILI VORTEX)

Time frame:
90 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Survived and Died
ParticipantsVILI VORTEXNo VILI VORTEX
Survivors131
Dead1419
PrimaryNumber of Patients With and Without Refractory Hypoxemia

The number of patients that evolved with refractory hypoxemia was compared between the patients with SARS-CoV-2 that evolved with VILI VORTEX and without VILI VORTEX) Refractory hypoxemia was defined as PaO2/FiO2 \<100 despite the optimization of mechanical ventilation and prone positioning.

Time frame:
90 days
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Patients With and Without Refractory Hypoxemia
participantsNo VILI VORTEXVILI VORTEX
with refractory hypoxemia114
no refractory hypoxemia491
PrimaryNumber of Patients With Complications

The following variables and complications were also observed during the period of analysis: incidence of pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation, need for noradrenaline over 0.1 γ/kg/min for more than 24 h, positive blood cultures, accumulated fluid balance, dialysis treatment, clinical and/or echocardiographic evidence of heart failure, lactate ≥2 mmol/L in at least two consecutive samples, presence of persistent fever (≥38º at least once a day for three consecutive days), and the highest value of ferritin, D-dimer, C-reactive protein, troponin I and LDH obtained during the first 14 days of invasive mechanical ventilation. VILI vortex patients had positive blood cultures, moderate to severe shock, persistent fever and fluid balance was considerably more positive.

Time frame:
90 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Complications
ParticipantsVILI VORTEXNo VILI VORTEX
intranosocomial pneumonia719
Renal replacement therapy718
Persistent fever710
Bood cultures910

Adverse events

Collected over up to 12 weeks after entering the study. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
VILI VORTEX14/15 (93.3%)14/15 (93.3%)10/15 (66.7%)
NO VILI VORTEX19/50 (38%)23/50 (46%)20/50 (40%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventVILI VORTEXNO VILI VORTEX
Refractory hipoxemyRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders14/151/50
Blood culturesInfections and infestations9/1510/50
Severe Kidney FailureRenal and urinary disorders7/1518/50
Intranosocomial pneumoniaInfections and infestations7/1519/50
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventVILI VORTEXNO VILI VORTEX
Lactate level >2mmol/LVascular disorders7/1516/50
Persistent feverGeneral disorders7/1510/50

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)VILI VORTEXNo VILI VORTEXTotal
Median59 (55 to 60)60 (54 to 66)60 (55 to 65)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)VILI VORTEXNo VILI VORTEXTotal
Percentage of male and female patients — Female61824
Percentage of male and female patients — Male93241
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)VILI VORTEXNo VILI VORTEXTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White155065
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)VILI VORTEXNo VILI VORTEXTotal
Argentina155065
Comorbidities
Comorbidities(participants)VILI VORTEXNo VILI VORTEXTotal
Hypertension92534
Diabetes Mellitus253358
Obesity51116
Ischemic heart disease268
COPD3710
Cancer/immunosupresion4610
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Nestor Pistillo
    Avellaneda, Buenos Aires 1870, Argentina
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Marini JJ, Gattinoni L. Time Course of Evolving Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury: The "Shrinking Baby Lung". Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug;48(8):1203-1209. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004416. PubMed 32697492 ↗
  • Beitler JR, Malhotra A, Thompson BT. Ventilator-induced Lung Injury. Clin Chest Med. 2016 Dec;37(4):633-646. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Oct 14. PubMed 27842744 ↗
  • Gattinoni L, Pesenti A. The concept of "baby lung". Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jun;31(6):776-84. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2627-z. Epub 2005 Apr 6. PubMed 15812622 ↗
  • Gattinoni L, Tonetti T, Quintel M. Regional physiology of ARDS. Crit Care. 2017 Dec 28;21(Suppl 3):312. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1905-9. PubMed 29297365 ↗
  • Vasques F, Duscio E, Cipulli F, Romitti F, Quintel M, Gattinoni L. Determinants and Prevention of Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury. Crit Care Clin. 2018 Jul;34(3):343-356. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2018.03.004. PubMed 29907269 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 25, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 30, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04174313
Lead sponsor
Hospital El Cruce
Responsible party
Nestor Pistillo (Head of Intensive Care Unit at Hospital El Cruce, Hospital El Cruce) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 22, 2019
Start date
Mar 10, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 11, 2021
Completion
Jun 9, 2021
Results posted
Aug 30, 2021
Last update
Aug 30, 2021

Study contacts

Nestor Pistillo
principal investigator · Hospital El Cruce

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion