ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04164394Updated Feb 11, 2020

Effect of I31 Probiotic on Lactose Intolerance

An interventional study of Placebo and I31 Probiotic in Lactose Intolerance, sponsored by Hospital Juarez de Mexico. Completed at 1 site in Mexico. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-11.

Sponsored by Hospital Juarez de Mexico · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2019, registered Nov 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized study evaluates the usefulness of the I31 probiotic formula, against placebo, in the treatment of symptoms of lactose intolerance.

Read the detailed description

People with lactose intolerance are unable to fully digest the sugar (lactose) in milk. As a result, they may have diarrhea, abdominal pain, gas and bloating after eating or drinking dairy products. A deficiency of lactase - an enzyme produced in your small intestine - is usually responsible for lactose intolerance. Many people have low levels of lactase but are able to digest milk products without problems. In lactose intolerance, though, lactase deficiency leads to symptoms after eating dairy foods.

I31 is a probiotic formula composed of Pediococcus acidilactici strain CECT7483 and Lactobacillus plantarum strains CECT7484 and CECT7485, previously shown to improve intestinal sensitivity in patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). IBS is a functional intestinal disease in which recurrent abdominal pain is associated with defecation or a change in bowel habits, often accompanied by bloating. Given the overlap in symptoms between IBS and lactose intolerance, it is hypothesized that I31 formula could be beneficial for individuals with lactose intolerance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lactose Intolerance

Keywords

  • Probiotic
  • Diarrhea
  • Abdominal pain
  • Flatulence
03

In context

Lactose Intolerance

53 studies on the registry are indexed under Lactose Intolerance; 6 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 48 is above the median of 41 across 41 interventional studies indexed under Lactose Intolerance.

Browse Lactose Intolerance studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Juarez de Mexico is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects attending Hospital Juarez de Mexico with self-reported lactose intolerance, a minimum lactose intolerance symptom score of 6 points, 20ppm during the Lactose Hydrogen Breath Test (LHBT) and providing .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • More than 10 ppm before ingestion of lactose in the Lactose Hydrogen Breath Test (LHBT). If such value was observed, the LHBT test was repeated on a 2nd day, and if >10ppm persisted, patient was excluded.
  • below 18 or above 40
  • Subjects not accepting to maintain their dietary and physical activity pattern unchanged for the duration of the study
  • Subjects with congenital lactase deficiency
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Significant gastrointestinal disease, such as inflammatory bowel disease, coeliac disease, chronic diarrhea or gastroparesis
  • History of gastrointestinal surgery in the 6 months prior to inclusion
  • History of intestinal perforation
  • History of acute gastroenteritis, acute gastroenteritis or hospitalization in the 4 weeks prior to inclusion
  • Substance abuse
  • Untreated thyroid disorder
  • Cancer
  • Other severe diseases that in the doctor's opinion could interfere with the study
  • Known allergy to any of the components in the treatments
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
48 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo treatment (maltodextrin), once daily (u.i.d)

    Other: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Probiotic

    I31 probiotic formula (dietary supplement), consisting of 3 billion cfus of strains P. acidilactici CECT7483, L.plantarum CECT7484 and L.plantarum CECT7485, once daily (u.i.d)

    Dietary Supplement: I31 Probiotic

Interventions

  • OtherPlacebo

    Placebo treatment (maltodextrin), once daily (u.i.d)

  • Dietary supplementI31 Probiotic

    I31 probiotic formula (dietary supplement), consisting of 3 billion cfus of strains P. acidilactici CECT7483, L.plantarum CECT7484 and L.plantarum CECT7485, once daily (u.i.d)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Symptoms Score

    Total score of the "Symptoms Questionnaire for Lactose Malabsorption Screening" (Casellas et al. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54:1059-65). Score ranges 0 to 50, where 50 represents maximum symptoms severity

    Time frame: 3 hours (performed after 25 gr lactose challenge, at baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Abdominal Pain subscore

    Abdominal pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) subscore of the "Symptoms Questionnaire for Lactose Malabsorption Screening". Score ranges 0 to 10, where 10 represents maximum pain severity (Casellas et al. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54:1059-65)

    Time frame: 3 hours (performed after 25 gr lactose challenge, at baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention)

  2. Vomiting subscore

    Vomiting Visual Analog Scale (VAS) subscore of the "Symptoms Questionnaire for Lactose Malabsorption Screening". Score ranges 0 to 10, where 10 represents maximum vomiting severity (Casellas et al. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54:1059-65)

    Time frame: 3 hours (performed after 25 gr lactose challenge, at baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention)

  3. Intestinal Sounds subscore

    Intestinal Visual Analog Scale (VAS) sounds subscore of the "Symptoms Questionnaire for Lactose Malabsorption Screening". Score ranges 0 to 10, where 10 represents maximum intestinal sounds severity (Casellas et al. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54:1059-65)

    Time frame: 3 hours (performed after 25 gr lactose challenge, at baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention)

  4. Flatulence subscore

    Flatulence Visual Analog Scale (VAS) subscore of the "Symptoms Questionnaire for Lactose Malabsorption Screening". Score ranges 0 to 10, where 10 represents maximum flatulence severity (Casellas et al. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54:1059-65)

    Time frame: 3 hours (performed after 25 gr lactose challenge, at baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention)

  5. Lactose Hydrogen Breath Test (LHBT)

    LHBT test performed with 25 gr of lactose after an overnight fast. Measurements 10 minutes before lactose ingestion and 60, 120 and 180 minutes after lactose ingestion. CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) used as control. If more than 10ppm in the measurement before ingestion of lactose, and LHBT test was rescheduled and recommendations to avoid complex carbohydrates 24h before the test were repeated. Carbon dioxide (CO2) was measured and used to adjust breath sample for non-alveolar dilution of exhaled air.

    Time frame: 3 hours (performed after 25 gr lactose challenge, at baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Juarez de Mexico
    Mexico City, Cdmx 07760, Mexico
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 11, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04164394
Lead sponsor
Hospital Juarez de Mexico
Responsible party
Nuria Pérez López (Digestive Physiology Lab Head, Hospital Juarez de Mexico) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 15, 2019
Start date
May 13, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 10, 2019
Completion
Dec 31, 2019
Last update
Feb 11, 2020

Study contacts

Nuria Perez Lopez, MD
study director · Hospital Juarez de Mexico

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion