ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04163887METALAPUpdated Feb 22, 2022

Effect of the Laparoscopic Approach in Reducing Postoperative Severe Complications Following Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

An interventional study of hepatectomy in Liver Metastasis Colon Cancer and Postoperative Complications, sponsored by Institut Mutualiste Montsouris. Status unknown at 21 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-22.

Sponsored by Institut Mutualiste Montsouris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
340
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of the laparoscopic approach over the open approach in the resection of colorectal liver metastases, by examining the reduction of postoperative complications (including mortality), measured using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) within 90 days of the procedure or regardless of the date during the hospital stay.

Read the detailed description

While laparotomy is still the standard approach of resectable colorectal liver mestastases, its associated morbidity remains non-negligible with reported mortality and complications rates ranging from 2 to 8% and 30 to 70%, respectively (1). Besides the underlying liver disease together with the comorbidities of the patients, this high morbidity is also related to the type of surgical approach. Since less than 15% of liver resections are currently performed using the laparoscopic approach in France, a trial showing the superiority of the laparoscopic approach in comparison to the open approach for patients with colorectal liver metastases qualifying for both approaches would allow improving management of patients, reducing the length of stay, maybe decreasing the global cost and changing current practices on a national scale.

In order to demonstrate the superiority of the laparoscopic approach over the laparotomy approach, patients with colorectal hepatic metastasis will be randomly assigned to either the laparoscopy or laparotomy groups. Post-operative complications (including mortality) will be measured using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) within 90 days postoperatively or at any time during hospitalization. The participation time for each patient in the study is 3 years, the patient will be followed at 1, 3, 6, 9, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30 and 36 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Liver Metastasis Colon Cancer
  • Postoperative Complications

Keywords

  • Liver resection
  • Laparoscopy
03

In context

Postoperative Complications

1,269 studies on the registry are indexed under Postoperative Complications; 299 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 340 is above the median of 117 across 710 interventional studies indexed under Postoperative Complications.

Browse Postoperative Complications studies →

Lead sponsor

Institut Mutualiste Montsouris is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Presenting with colorectal liver metastases requiring liver resection ± concomitant radiofrequency ablation.
  • Qualifying for both a laparoscopic approach and an open approach.
  • Informed written consent.
  • Affiliated to health insurance regimen.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hybrid liver resection (including both laparoscopic and open resection).
  • Liver resection requiring an associated vascular or biliary reconstruction.
  • Contraindication to surgery.
  • Contraindication to laparoscopy (pneumoperitoneum).
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score IV or V or life expectancy \< 3 months.
  • Poor comprehension of French language or cognitive impairment
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Patient under guardianship or unable to give consent
  • People particularly protected by French law.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
340 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    laparoscopic liver resection

    Laparoscopy allows some surgical procedures to be performed through small incisions that enable the operator to access the abdominal cavity, often at the pubic area, and surgical instruments are introduced through these small incisions. This technique avoids large abdominal incisions and significantly reduces the duration of hospitalization.

    Procedure: hepatectomy

  • Other
    open liver resection

    standard of care

    Procedure: hepatectomy

Interventions

  • Procedurehepatectomy

    Resection colorectal liver metastases using a laparoscopic approach or an open approach.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of overall complications using the comprehensive complication Index (CCI)

    CCI is calculated using the burden of postoperative complications weighted with a measure of the severity according to the widely accepted Dindo-Clavien classification of postoperative complications and a dedicated CCI calculator.

    Time frame: Within 90 days postoperatively or at any time during hospitalization.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients presenting severe postoperative complications

    Proportion of patients presenting severe postoperative complications rate as defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ grade 3 (including mortality) between patients treated with laparoscopic liver resection and those treated with open liver surgery

    Time frame: Within 90 days postoperatively or at any time during hospitalization.

  2. Rate of conversion from laparoscopy liver resection to open liver surgery

    Conversion is defined as the requirement for laparotomy at any time of the procedure with the exception of the extraction of the resected specimen. Specific data regarding conversion will be noticed from the operative reports. These included the reasons for conversion, the timing of conversion and the type of conversion.

    Time frame: during surgery.

  3. Length of hospital stay

    Length of hospital stay and occurrence of unplanned readmission after discharge,assessed by hospitalization reports

    Time frame: Within 90 days postoperatively or at any time during hospitalization.

  4. Delay of recovery before resuming professional activities.

    Delay of recovery before resuming professional activities assessed by PQRS (Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale) including nociceptive domain, emotional domain, cognition domain and day-to-day activities at D-1, D1, D7, D30 and D90.

    Time frame: Within 90 days postoperatively

  5. Postoperative quality of life using quality of life questionnaries.

    Patient-reported outcome measures were assessed with the validated European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) score questionnaire, EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) -C30 (version 3.0), and the module dedicated to colorectal liver metastases (EORTC QLQ-LMC21). EQ5D-5L is a standardised measure of health status that provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value suitable for the economic evaluation of health. It will be used to calculate the QALYs of each enrolled patient, by valuing health.

    Time frame: At the inclusion (before surgery), at 1 month postintervention, 3 months, 6 months and then every 6 months during 3 years.

  6. Health economics analysis

    A cost-effectiveness study will be performed and completed by a cost-utility analysis to identify the efficient therapeutic strategy (laparoscopic approach) ompared to the reference (open surgery). Only direct costs will be considered for treatments, management of side effects, medical transports, rehabilitation procedures and medical consultations. Out of hospital resources are valued from the Social Health Insurance (SHI) tariffs and hospital stays the Diagnosis-Related group (DRG) tariff taking into account additional daily fixed prices for ICU stay, if any.

    Time frame: During the full participation period (3 years).

  7. Oncologic quality of the resection using the pathological report.

    Mean surgical margin widths (in millimeters). Percentages of microscopically complete (R0), microscopically incomplete (R1) and macroscopically incomplete (R2) resections as stated in the pathological report.

    Time frame: During surgery

  8. Disease-free and overall survival at 3 years.

    1. Percentage of patients with intrahepatic or extrahepatic recurrence three years after the operation. 2. Median disease-free survival time (in months). 3. Percentage of patients who died at 1, 2 and 3 years after the procedure. 4. Median overall survival time (in months).

    Time frame: During the full participation period (3 years).

07

Study locations

6 of 21 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):5-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. Epub 2015 Jan 5. PubMed 25559415 ↗
  • Manfredi S, Lepage C, Hatem C, Coatmeur O, Faivre J, Bouvier AM. Epidemiology and management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2006 Aug;244(2):254-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000217629.94941.cf. PubMed 16858188 ↗
  • Power DG, Kemeny NE. Role of adjuvant therapy after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 1;28(13):2300-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.9340. Epub 2010 Apr 5. PubMed 20368552 ↗
  • Komatsu S, Scatton O, Goumard C, Sepulveda A, Brustia R, Perdigao F, Soubrane O. Development Process and Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: Learning Curve Based on 15 Years of Experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2017 May;224(5):841-850. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.037. Epub 2017 Jan 20. PubMed 28111192 ↗
  • Fuks D, Cauchy F, Fteriche S, Nomi T, Schwarz L, Dokmak S, Scatton O, Fusco G, Belghiti J, Gayet B, Soubrane O. Laparoscopy Decreases Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Major Liver Resection: A Propensity Score Analysis. Ann Surg. 2016 Feb;263(2):353-61. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001140. PubMed 25607769 ↗
  • Nomi T, Fuks D, Ogiso S, Nakajima Y, Louvet C, Gayet B. Second and Third Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Patients With Recurrent Colorectal Liver Metastases. Ann Surg. 2016 May;263(5):e68-72. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001528. No abstract available. PubMed 26641255 ↗
  • Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G. Comparative Short-term Benefits of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: 9000 Cases and Climbing. Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):761-77. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001413. PubMed 26700223 ↗
  • Hallet J, Sa Cunha A, Cherqui D, Gayet B, Goere D, Bachellier P, Laurent A, Fuks D, Navarro F, Pessaux P; French Colorectal Liver Metastases Working Group, Association Francaise de Chirurgie. Laparoscopic Compared to Open Repeat Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Multi-institutional Propensity-Matched Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes. World J Surg. 2017 Dec;41(12):3189-3198. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4119-z. PubMed 28717911 ↗
  • Fretland AA, Dagenborg VJ, Bjornelv GMW, Kazaryan AM, Kristiansen R, Fagerland MW, Hausken J, Tonnessen TI, Abildgaard A, Barkhatov L, Yaqub S, Rosok BI, Bjornbeth BA, Andersen MH, Flatmark K, Aas E, Edwin B. Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases: The OSLO-COMET Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2018 Feb;267(2):199-207. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002353. PubMed 28657937 ↗
  • Gilg S, Sparrelid E, Isaksson B, Lundell L, Nowak G, Stromberg C. Mortality-related risk factors and long-term survival after 4460 liver resections in Sweden-a population-based study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Feb;402(1):105-113. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1512-2. Epub 2016 Oct 1. PubMed 27695941 ↗
  • Cannon RM, Scoggins CR, Callender GG, McMasters KM, Martin RC 2nd. Laparoscopic versus open resection of hepatic colorectal metastases. Surgery. 2012 Oct;152(4):567-73; discussion 573-4. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.013. Epub 2012 Sep 1. PubMed 22943842 ↗
  • Beppu T, Wakabayashi G, Hasegawa K, Gotohda N, Mizuguchi T, Takahashi Y, Hirokawa F, Taniai N, Watanabe M, Katou M, Nagano H, Honda G, Baba H, Kokudo N, Konishi M, Hirata K, Yamamoto M, Uchiyama K, Uchida E, Kusachi S, Kubota K, Mori M, Takahashi K, Kikuchi K, Miyata H, Takahara T, Nakamura M, Kaneko H, Yamaue H, Miyazaki M, Takada T. Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Oct;22(10):711-20. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.261. Epub 2015 May 21. PubMed 25902703 ↗
  • Adam R, Pascal G, Azoulay D, Tanaka K, Castaing D, Bismuth H. Liver resection for colorectal metastases: the third hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2003 Dec;238(6):871-83; discussion 883-4. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000098112.04758.4e. PubMed 14631224 ↗
  • Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Haglind E; COLOR II Study Group. A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):194. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1505367. No abstract available. PubMed 26154803 ↗
  • Farges O, Goutte N, Bendersky N, Falissard B; ACHBT-French Hepatectomy Study Group. Incidence and risks of liver resection: an all-inclusive French nationwide study. Ann Surg. 2012 Nov;256(5):697-704; discussion 704-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827241d5. PubMed 23095612 ↗
  • Tranchart H, Dagher I. Laparoscopic liver resection: a review. J Visc Surg. 2014 Apr;151(2):107-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Dec 22. PubMed 24365035 ↗
  • Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D. The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):772-82. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bd93b2. PubMed 19801926 ↗
  • Castaing D, Vibert E, Ricca L, Azoulay D, Adam R, Gayet B. Oncologic results of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases in two specialized centers. Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):849-55. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bcaf63. PubMed 19801934 ↗
  • Hasegawa Y, Nitta H, Sasaki A, Takahara T, Itabashi H, Katagiri H, Otsuka K, Nishizuka S, Wakabayashi G. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for liver metastases from colorectal cancer: A comparative analysis of 168 consecutive cases at a single center. Surgery. 2015 Jun;157(6):1065-72. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.01.017. Epub 2015 Mar 16. PubMed 25791030 ↗
  • Karagkounis G, Akyuz M, Guerron AD, Yazici P, Aucejo FN, Quintini C, Miller CM, Vogt DP, Fung JJ, Berber E. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive liver resection for colorectal metastases: A case-control study of 130 patients. Surgery. 2016 Oct;160(4):1097-1103. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.043. Epub 2016 Jul 30. PubMed 27486002 ↗
  • Schiffman SC, Kim KH, Tsung A, Marsh JW, Geller DA. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a metaanalysis of 610 patients. Surgery. 2015 Feb;157(2):211-22. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.08.036. Epub 2014 Oct 1. PubMed 25282529 ↗
  • Tohme S, Goswami J, Han K, Chidi AP, Geller DA, Reddy S, Gleisner A, Tsung A. Minimally Invasive Resection of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Leads to an Earlier Initiation of Chemotherapy Compared to Open Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Dec;19(12):2199-206. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2962-5. Epub 2015 Oct 5. PubMed 26438480 ↗
  • Topal H, Tiek J, Aerts R, Topal B. Outcome of laparoscopic major liver resection for colorectal metastases. Surg Endosc. 2012 Sep;26(9):2451-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2209-4. Epub 2012 Feb 23. PubMed 22358126 ↗
  • Polignano FM, Quyn AJ, Sanjay P, Henderson NA, Tait IS. Totally laparoscopic strategies for the management of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis. Surg Endosc. 2012 Sep;26(9):2571-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2235-2. Epub 2012 Mar 22. PubMed 22437957 ↗
  • Vanounou T, Steel JL, Nguyen KT, Tsung A, Marsh JW, Geller DA, Gamblin TC. Comparing the clinical and economic impact of laparoscopic versus open liver resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Apr;17(4):998-1009. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0839-0. Epub 2009 Dec 22. PubMed 20033324 ↗
  • Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Han HS, Kaneko H, Buell JF. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is theoretically better than open hepatectomy: preparing for the 2nd International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Oct;21(10):723-31. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.139. Epub 2014 Aug 5. PubMed 25130985 ↗
  • Kazaryan AM, Marangos IP, Rosok BI, Rosseland AR, Villanger O, Fosse E, Mathisen O, Edwin B. Laparoscopic resection of colorectal liver metastases: surgical and long-term oncologic outcome. Ann Surg. 2010 Dec;252(6):1005-12. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f66954. PubMed 21107111 ↗
  • Makabe K, Nitta H, Takahara T, Hasegawa Y, Kanno S, Nishizuka S, Sasaki A, Wakabayashi G. Efficacy of occlusion of hepatic artery and risk of carbon dioxide gas embolism during laparoscopic hepatectomy in a pig model. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Aug;21(8):592-8. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.103. Epub 2014 Apr 21. PubMed 24753492 ↗
  • Wu WC, Smith TS, Henderson WG, Eaton CB, Poses RM, Uttley G, Mor V, Sharma SC, Vezeridis M, Khuri SF, Friedmann PD. Operative blood loss, blood transfusion, and 30-day mortality in older patients after major noncardiac surgery. Ann Surg. 2010 Jul;252(1):11-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e3e43f. PubMed 20505504 ↗
  • Karakousis GC, Singer S, Zheng J, Gonen M, Coit D, DeMatteo RP, Strong VE. Laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): a size-matched comparison. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jun;18(6):1599-605. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1517-y. Epub 2011 Jan 5. PubMed 21207158 ↗
  • Pham TH, Perry KA, Dolan JP, Schipper P, Sukumar M, Sheppard BC, Hunter JG. Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Am J Surg. 2010 May;199(5):594-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.005. PubMed 20466101 ↗
  • Nobili C, Marzano E, Oussoultzoglou E, Rosso E, Addeo P, Bachellier P, Jaeck D, Pessaux P. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for pulmonary complications after hepatic resection. Ann Surg. 2012 Mar;255(3):540-50. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182485857. PubMed 22330041 ↗
  • Lawrence VA, Cornell JE, Smetana GW; American College of Physicians. Strategies to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications after noncardiothoracic surgery: systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 18;144(8):596-608. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-8-200604180-00011. PubMed 16618957 ↗
  • Soubrane O, Schwarz L, Cauchy F, Perotto LO, Brustia R, Bernard D, Scatton O. A Conceptual Technique for Laparoscopic Right Hepatectomy Based on Facts and Oncologic Principles: The Caudal Approach. Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):1226-31. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000737. PubMed 24854453 ↗
  • Fretland AA, Sokolov A, Postriganova N, Kazaryan AM, Pischke SE, Nilsson PH, Rognes IN, Bjornbeth BA, Fagerland MW, Mollnes TE, Edwin B. Inflammatory Response After Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Data From the Oslo-CoMet Trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(42):e1786. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001786. PubMed 26496309 ↗
  • Veenhof AA, Vlug MS, van der Pas MH, Sietses C, van der Peet DL, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Bonjer HJ, Bemelman WA, Cuesta MA. Surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopy or open surgery with fast track or standard perioperative care: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2012 Feb;255(2):216-21. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824336e2. PubMed 22241289 ↗
  • Qiu J, Chen S, Pankaj P, Wu H. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is associated with considerably less morbidity and a long-term survival similar to that of the open procedure in patients with hepatic colorectal metastases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Dec;24(6):517-22. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31829cec2b. PubMed 25187072 ↗
  • Gigot JF, Glineur D, Santiago Azagra J, Goergen M, Ceuterick M, Morino M, Etienne J, Marescaux J, Mutter D, van Krunckelsven L, Descottes B, Valleix D, Lachachi F, Bertrand C, Mansvelt B, Hubens G, Saey JP, Schockmel R; Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Section of the Royal Belgian Society of Surgery and the Belgian Group for Endoscopic Surgery. Laparoscopic liver resection for malignant liver tumors: preliminary results of a multicenter European study. Ann Surg. 2002 Jul;236(1):90-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200207000-00014. PubMed 12131090 ↗
  • Okunrintemi V, Gani F, Pawlik TM. National Trends in Postoperative Outcomes and Cost Comparing Minimally Invasive Versus Open Liver and Pancreatic Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Nov;20(11):1836-1843. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3267-z. Epub 2016 Sep 9. PubMed 27613735 ↗
  • Montalti R, Berardi G, Laurent S, Sebastiani S, Ferdinande L, Libbrecht LJ, Smeets P, Brescia A, Rogiers X, de Hemptinne B, Geboes K, Troisi RI. Laparoscopic liver resection compared to open approach in patients with colorectal liver metastases improves further resectability: Oncological outcomes of a case-control matched-pairs analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 May;40(5):536-544. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Feb 2. PubMed 24555996 ↗
  • Nachmany I, Pencovich N, Zohar N, Ben-Yehuda A, Binyamin C, Goykhman Y, Lubezky N, Nakache R, Klausner JM. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;41(12):1615-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.09.014. Epub 2015 Sep 30. PubMed 26454765 ↗
  • Ratti F, Catena M, Di Palo S, Staudacher C, Aldrighetti L. Impact of totally laparoscopic combined management of colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases on severity of complications: a propensity-score-based analysis. Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4934-4945. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4835-8. Epub 2016 Mar 4. PubMed 26944725 ↗
  • Allard MA, Cunha AS, Gayet B, Adam R, Goere D, Bachellier P, Azoulay D, Ayav A, Navarro F, Pessaux P; Colorectal Liver Metastases-French Study Group. Early and Long-term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Propensity Score-based Analysis. Ann Surg. 2015 Nov;262(5):794-802. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001475. PubMed 26583668 ↗
  • Cipriani F, Rawashdeh M, Stanton L, Armstrong T, Takhar A, Pearce NW, Primrose J, Abu Hilal M. Propensity score-based analysis of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal metastases. Br J Surg. 2016 Oct;103(11):1504-12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10211. Epub 2016 Aug 3. PubMed 27484847 ↗
  • Van Ness P. The concept of risk in biomedical research involving human subjects. Bioethics. 2001 Aug;15(4):364-70. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00244. PubMed 11697390 ↗
  • Tranchart H, Fuks D, Vigano L, Ferretti S, Paye F, Wakabayashi G, Ferrero A, Gayet B, Dagher I. Laparoscopic simultaneous resection of colorectal primary tumor and liver metastases: a propensity score matching analysis. Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1853-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4467-4. Epub 2015 Aug 15. PubMed 26275554 ↗
  • Untereiner X, Cagniet A, Memeo R, Tzedakis S, Piardi T, Severac F, Mutter D, Kianmanesh R, Marescaux J, Sommacale D, Pessaux P. Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastases: comparative study with propensity score matching. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2016 Aug;5(4):290-9. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2015.12.06. PubMed 27500141 ↗
  • Martinez-Cecilia D, Cipriani F, Shelat V, Ratti F, Tranchart H, Barkhatov L, Tomassini F, Montalti R, Halls M, Troisi RI, Dagher I, Aldrighetti L, Edwin B, Abu Hilal M. Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases in Elderly and Octogenarian Patients: A Multicenter Propensity Score Based Analysis of Short- and Long-term Outcomes. Ann Surg. 2017 Jun;265(6):1192-1200. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002147. PubMed 28151797 ↗
  • Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Dam RM, van Breukelen GJ, Tanis PJ, Ratti F, van Hillegersberg R, Slooter GD, de Wilt JH, Liem MS, de Boer MT, Klaase JM, Neumann UP, Aldrighetti LA, Dejong CH; ORANGE II Collaborative Group. Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme (ORANGE II study). Br J Surg. 2017 Apr;104(5):525-535. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10438. Epub 2017 Jan 31. PubMed 28138958 ↗
  • Elshamy M, Takahashi H, Akyuz M, Yazici P, Yigitbas H, Hammad AY, Aucejo FN, Quintini C, Fung J, Berber E. Evolution of a laparoscopic liver resection program: an analysis of 203 cases. Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4150-4155. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5468-2. Epub 2017 Mar 31. PubMed 28364151 ↗
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. PubMed 15273542 ↗
  • Slankamenac K, Nederlof N, Pessaux P, de Jonge J, Wijnhoven BP, Breitenstein S, Oberkofler CE, Graf R, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. The comprehensive complication index: a novel and more sensitive endpoint for assessing outcome and reducing sample size in randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2014 Nov;260(5):757-62; discussion 762-3. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000948. PubMed 25379846 ↗
  • Balzan S, Belghiti J, Farges O, Ogata S, Sauvanet A, Delefosse D, Durand F. The "50-50 criteria" on postoperative day 5: an accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2005 Dec;242(6):824-8, discussion 828-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000189131.90876.9e. PubMed 16327492 ↗
  • Ishizawa T, Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Sano K, Imamura H, Beck Y, Sugawara Y, Makuuchi M. Risk factors and management of ascites after liver resection to treat hepatocellular carcinoma. Arch Surg. 2009 Jan;144(1):46-51. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2008.511. PubMed 19153324 ↗
  • Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L, Fan ST, Yokoyama Y, Crawford M, Makuuchi M, Christophi C, Banting S, Brooke-Smith M, Usatoff V, Nagino M, Maddern G, Hugh TJ, Vauthey JN, Greig P, Rees M, Nimura Y, Figueras J, DeMatteo RP, Buchler MW, Weitz J. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery. 2011 May;149(5):680-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.12.002. Epub 2011 Feb 12. PubMed 21316725 ↗
  • Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Am J Infect Control. 1992 Oct;20(5):271-4. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(05)80201-9. No abstract available. PubMed 1332552 ↗
  • Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Maddern G, Koch M, Hugh TJ, Fan ST, Nimura Y, Figueras J, Vauthey JN, Rees M, Adam R, Dematteo RP, Greig P, Usatoff V, Banting S, Nagino M, Capussotti L, Yokoyama Y, Brooke-Smith M, Crawford M, Christophi C, Makuuchi M, Buchler MW, Weitz J. Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB (Oxford). 2011 Aug;13(8):528-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00319.x. Epub 2011 Jun 7. PubMed 21762295 ↗
  • Cauchy F, Fuks D, Nomi T, Schwarz L, Barbier L, Dokmak S, Scatton O, Belghiti J, Soubrane O, Gayet B. Risk factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic major liver resection. Br J Surg. 2015 Jun;102(7):785-95. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9806. Epub 2015 Apr 2. PubMed 25846843 ↗
  • Blazeby JM, Fayers P, Conroy T, Sezer O, Ramage J, Rees M; European Organization for Research Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group. Validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-LMC21 questionnaire for assessment of patient-reported outcomes during treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2009 Mar;96(3):291-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6471. PubMed 19224519 ↗
  • Graham JW, Olchowski AE, Gilreath TD. How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prev Sci. 2007 Sep;8(3):206-13. doi: 10.1007/s11121-007-0070-9. Epub 2007 Jun 5. PubMed 17549635 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 22, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04163887
Lead sponsor
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Collaborators
Ministry of Health, France, National Cancer Institute, France
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 15, 2019
Start date
Jan 27, 2021
Primary completion
Apr 27, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 27, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 22, 2022

Study contacts

Caroline RIX
Contact
caroline.rix@imm.fr
+33 156616371
Nassima OUDAFAL
Contact
nassima.oudafal@imm.fr
+33 156616675
David FUKS, PR
study chair · Institut Mutualiste Montsouris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion