ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04153227Updated Aug 29, 2024

Osteoporosis, Trabecular Bone Score and Fracture Risk Assessment in Male Patients After Radical Cystectomy

An observational study in Osteoporosis and Bladder Disease, sponsored by Corporacion Parc Tauli. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to male participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-29.

Sponsored by Corporacion Parc Tauli · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
112
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Radical cystectomy (RC) with ileal urinary diversion (UD) is a standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, emerging evidence indicates that this procedure may significantly impact bone health. Patients with UDs have a 21-48% higher risk of experiencing a fragility fracture compared to the general population. The underlying mechanisms are not entirely understood, but one prevailing hypothesis implicates substantial bone mineral density (BMD) loss due to the metabolic changes induced by UD, particularly driven by metabolic acidosis.

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) remains the gold standard for measuring BMD and provides an indirect assessment of fracture risk. However, the trabecular bone score (TBS), a non-invasive imaging technique that evaluates bone microarchitecture, offers additional insights into bone quality that are independent of BMD and enhances the understanding of bone strength and fracture resistance. Furthermore, the use of tools such as the FRAX® (Fracture Risk Assessment Tool) helps in identifying patients at higher risk of osteoporotic fractures by estimating the 10-year probability of major fractures (MOF) (spine, forearm, hip, or shoulder) and hip fractures (HIP) based on various clinical risk factors. The predictive accuracy of FRAX® can be further refined by incorporating femoral neck BMD and adjusting for TBS.

Osteoporosis in men is a frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated condition. This underdiagnosis is also evident in patients with UDs. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of bone alterations in men post-RC, employing both BMD and TBS measurements. Additionally, it seeks to identify key risk factors and critically assess the utility of FRAX® as a screening tool for pinpointing patients at elevated fracture risk.

To the best of the investigator's knowledge it will be the first study assessing the bone health after RC evaluating BMD, TBS and the fracture risk using the FRAX algorithm.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoporosis
  • Bladder Disease

Keywords

  • Osteoporosis
  • Trabecular bone score
  • FRAX
  • Radical cystectomy
  • Fracture risk
  • Metabolic acidosis
  • Vertebral fracture assessment
  • Bone mineral density
  • Urinary diversion
03

In context

Osteoporosis

1,601 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoporosis; 209 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 112 is below the median of 160 across 455 observational studies indexed under Osteoporosis.

Browse Osteoporosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Corporacion Parc Tauli is the lead sponsor of 167 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Males who underwent radical cystectomy with ileal urinary diversion (ileal conduit or neobladder).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients who understand, agree to participate and sign the .
  • Males older than 50 years old.
  • Patients undergoing radical cystectomy with ileal conduit or neobladder.
  • Time over one year after radical cystectomy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female gender.
  • Males below 50 years old.
  • Radical cystectomy performed less than one year before.
  • Radical cystectomy with cutaneous ureterostomy.
  • Patients diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism.
  • Patients receiving treatments that could influence bone metabolism, such as antiresorptive agents (including bisphosphonates or denosumab), chronic , androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Patients receiving treatment with Vitamin D were not excluded.
  • Patients previously diagnosed with osteoporosis.
  • Patients with a history of hemodialysis or renal transplantation.
  • Patients receiving systemic cancer therapies for bladder tumor progression or other .
  • Any patient who does not agree to participate or does not sign the
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
112 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testBone mineral density (BMD)

    Bone mineral density (BMD) is measured by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). BMD provides a measure of bone mass.

  • Diagnostic testTrabecular bone score (TBS)

    The Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) is a novel gray-level texture measurement that can be extracted from DXA images. TBS provides a measure of bone quality (bone microarchitecture).

  • Diagnostic testFracture risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)

    The Fracture risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) is a fracture risk calculator that estimates an individual's 10-year probability of incurring a hip or other major osteoporotic fracture.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Bone mineral Density (BMD)

    BMD values were categorized according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria at any of the three measured sites: normal (T-score ≥ -1 SD), osteopenia (T-score between -1 and -2.5 SD), and osteoporosis (T-score ≤ -2.5 SD).

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Trabecular bone score (TBS)

    Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a lumbar spine dual-energy absorptiometry texture index, which provides information on microarchitecture skeletal quality partially independent of BMD (TBS values \>1.310 normal; TBS: 1.310-1.230 microarchitecture partially degraded; TBS \<1.230 microarchitecture degraded).

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Vertebral fractures

    Presence of vertebral fractures evaluated by Vertebral Fracture Assessment (VFA)

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)

    FRAX provides country-specific algorithms for estimating individualized 10-year probability of hip and major osteoporotic fracture (FRAX with and without BMD and FRAX with TBS). Criteria for starting antiresorptive treatment in Spain: Risk of major osteoporotic fracture at 10 years ≥7.5% (with BMD) or ≥10% (without BMD) or risk of hip fracture ≥3% (with or without BMD).

    Time frame: Baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Number of patients with metabolic acidosis.

    Metabolic acidosis is considered if venous serum bicarbonate \<22mmol/L

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Number of patients with Secondary hyperparathyroidism.

    Secondary hiperparathyroidism is considered if Serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) \>65 pg/mL

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Number of patients with Serum total 25(OH) vitamin D deficiency.

    Serum total 25(OH) vitamine D deficiency is considered if \<30 ng/mL

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Number of patients with moderate-severe chronic kidney disease

    Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \<60 mL/min

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí
    Sabadell, 08208, Spain
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2018 to primary completion in Apr 2024, 75 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 4, 2019
First posted
Nov 6, 2019
StartActual
Jan 1, 2018
Primary completionActual
Apr 25, 2024
CompletionActual
Apr 25, 2024
Last update
Aug 29, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04153227
Responsible party
Arturo Dominguez Garcia (Principal investigator, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 6, 2019
Start date
Jan 1, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 25, 2024
Completion
Apr 25, 2024
Last update
Aug 29, 2024

Study contacts

Arturo Domínguez, MD
principal investigator · Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion