CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04146727Updated Oct 31, 2019

Utilizing Technology for Optimization of Pain Management and Mobilization in High Risk Cardiac Surgical ICU Patients

An observational study in Transplant; Failure, Heart, Heart Failure, Congestive and Lung Transplant Failure, sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-31.

Sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2019), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
168
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this project is to improve mobility in the perioperative period using activity trackers to augment current practice.

Delirium and poor functional status following ICU stays are intractable problems for which clear solutions do not exist. Digital health approaches have not been applied to these problems in the ICU setting and may represent a viable and unexplored intervention.

The program will involve the utilization of an activity tracker in ambulating patients. There will be two arms to the program. The first will involve the longitudinal study of ambulating lung transplant patients. Patients will be given an activity tracker at time of transplant which will continue throughout their care into their first month at home. The data will be collected to identify correlation between activity and clinical outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Early mobilization of patients, minimizing sedatives, maximizing pain control, optimizing sleep are strongly associated with decreased rates of delirium, decreased ICU length of stay, decreased hospital length of stay as well as improved functional status and quality of life at 1 year. Cardiac surgical patients that are at high risk of prolonged stay in the ICU due to the inherent nature of their disease (ie need for MCS (mechanical circulatory support) or lung transplantation) are most likely to benefit from a systematic aggressive approach to early mobilization. Technology such as activity trackers and virtual reality have been studied in general surgical populations but with limited data in the ICU and to date no studies in a cardiac surgical population. Activity trackers utilized in a multidisciplinary team to provide objective data to care teams and patients can be used to develop goal setting and patient motivation for teams, thereby improving mobility

Overall Goal: To evaluate whether quantitative information on post procedural ambulation in mechanical device patients, cardiac surgical patients and lung transplant patients can improve care teams ability to monitor and identify patients at high risk for complications and prolonged length of stay.

  • The purpose of the research is to improve mobility in the perioperative period using Activity Trackers to augment current practice.
  • Objective quantification and improvement in activity of post cardiac surgery patients might result in improved clinical outcomes, thereby making this tool a part of routine practice.

Patient Populations:

  1. Lung transplant patients
  2. Routine postoperative Cardiac surgical patients (elective cardiac surgical procedures including CABG and Valve replacement)
  3. Device Patients (axillary patients pre-open heart transplantation (OHT). Post MCS patients)

Specific Aim 1: Create standardized trajectories for ambulation of study subject populations from time of index procedure to 30 days postoperatively Specific Aim 2: To determine if deviation from the standardized trajectory of postoperative ambulation predicts disposition (home, rehabilitation facility or SNF), length of stay, 30 day readmissions, intensive care unit (ICU) readmission, DVT, respiratory insufficiency (aspiration) Specific Aim 3: To determine if decline in ambulation over 48 hours for a given patient predicts outcomes including length of stay, readmission to an icu, readmission to hospital, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), respiratory insufficiency.

The purpose of this project is to improve mobility in the perioperative period using activity trackers to augment current practice.

Delirium and poor functional status following ICU stays are intractable problems for which clear solutions do not exist. Digital health approaches have not been applied to these problems in the ICU setting and may represent a viable and unexplored intervention.

The program will involve the utilization of an activity tracker in ambulating patients. There will be two arms to the program. The first will involve the longitudinal study of ambulating lung transplant patients. Patients will be given an activity tracker at time of transplant which will continue throughout their care into their first month at home. The data will be collected to identify correlation between activity and clinical outcomes.

The second part of the program will be within the intensive care unit. The daily step count will be recorded for all ambulatory patients that fall into one of the defined subject populations and have signed informed consent. Step counts will be displayed for the care teams as well as the patient. This will be utilized by team to continuously evaluate and modify physical mobility goals for the patient with earlier recognition of decreasing mobility which is associated with worse outcomes. The goals and progress for the patient will be displayed to the nursing staff and the patient which we hypothesize will increase motivation.

Our hypothesis is that these interventions will increase mobility, decrease ICU length of stay, optimize the ICU experience, and potentially increase in 6-month functional status.

02

Conditions studied

  • Transplant; Failure, Heart
  • Heart Failure, Congestive
  • Lung Transplant Failure

Browse trials for

03

In context

Heart Failure

5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,220 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 168 is below the median of 200 across 1,679 observational studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 441 studies on the registry; 108 are open to participants now.

Of its 62 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 47 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Investigators and co-investigators will approach eligible subjects about the study in person after identification of patients in the intensive care unit or prior to surgery if it is not an emergent surgery. Some of the patients will be patients of other surgeons and intensivists who are part of the team-based care of these cardiac surgical patients.

Inclusion criteria

Patients that are at high-risk patients for one of the following interventions, will be considered for this study:

  1. Axillary impella patients awaiting transplant, advanced MCS therapy or weaning
  2. MCS patients post procedure including TAH, LVADs
  3. Lung Transplant patients
  4. Subjects > 18 years of age.
  5. Ability to provide informed consent and follow-up with protocol procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-ambulatory patients
  2. Participation in an on-going protocol studying an experimental drug or device
  3. Use of a walker, cane or wheelchair at baseline
  4. Inability to wear the biosensor on the wrist
  5. Any condition or other reason that, in the opinion of the Investigator or Medical Monitor, would render the subject unsuitable for the study
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
168 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
30 Days
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • ICU Duration

    The total study duration is determined by their length of stay in the ICU.

  • Transplant through 1 month at Home

    Time from surgery through 1 month at home. Maximum duration is length of stay in the ICU plus 1 month at home.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Daily ambulation

    Steps taken

    Time frame: From date of inclusion until discharge from hospital assessed up to 30 days post enrollment

  2. Length of Stay

    Days until Discharge to a transitional care facility vs. home

    Time frame: From date of inclusion until discharge from hospital assessed up to 30 days post enrollment

  3. Admit again to ICU

    Readmissions to an ICU or hospital

    Time frame: From date of inclusion until event or 30 days post enrollment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 31, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04146727
Lead sponsor
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Responsible party
Anahat Dhillon (Staff Physician II, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 31, 2019
Start date
Jan 2020 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 31, 2019

Study contacts

Anahat Dhillion, MD
Contact
Anahat.Dhillon@cshs.org
3104233300
Tracey S Early, BS, MA
Contact
tracey.early@cshs.org
3104231231
Anahat Dhillon, MD
principal investigator · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion