CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04146142NORAPPUpdated Dec 7, 2021

Transperineal MRI-TRUS Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy With vs Without Antibiotic Prophylaxis

An interventional study of Transperineal prostate biopsy with or without antibiotic prophylaxis in Prostate Biopsy and Antibiotic, sponsored by Oslo University Hospital. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to male participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-12-07.

Sponsored by Oslo University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
550
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Prostate biopsy is indicated in patients with suspected prostate cancer and has been traditionally performed through the rectum using antibiotic prophylaxis. Increasing antibiotic resistance of intestinal bacteria is causing a growing number of patients to get post-biopsy infections. Sepsis rate after transrectal biopsies is approximately 4-10%.

To reduce the risk of post-biopsy infections, transperineal approach in general anesthesia and antibiotic prophylaxis has been used. The investigators at Oslo University Hospital Aker developed MRI -TURS elastic image fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy technique in local anesthesia and Bactrim prophylaxis as outpatient procedure. The investigators found 0.4% post-biopsy infection rate. Afterwards a pilot study using the same biopsy technique however without antibiotic prophylaxis was realized in 90 patients. None of these subjects experienced infection.

The investigators wish to perform a prospective randomized trial of antibiotic prophylaxis versus none before transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion guided prostate biopsy in local anesthesia in outpatient clinic.

Read the detailed description

Background: Unnecessary use of antibiotics promotes antibiotic resistance. Efforts for antibiotic use reduction without increase the risk of serious infection complications are therefore needed.

Purpose: The aim of this trial is to compare the rates of infectious complication after transperineal prostate biopsy in patients with and without antibiotic prophylaxis.

Materials and methods: A total of 450 patients will be included in this trial. A 1:1 randomization to receive or not receive antibiotics prophylaxis will be performed using randomization system WebCRF-3 system. MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy will be done with transperineal prostate approach in local anesthesia in outpatient clinic. In patients with normal MRI,12-core systematic prostate biopsies with 3D biopsy registration will be done according to the EAU guidelines. In patients with positive MRI, 2-4 targeted biopsies from the suspicious MRI areas will be realized and systematic prostate biopsies will also be done. All prostate biopsies will be performed using Koelis MRI-TRUS image fusion and organ based tracking system. Post-biopsy infection and any adverse events will be systematically prospectively registered in all patients. Pain during the local anesthesia application and during the biopsy procedure will be registered using Visual Analog Score, 10 points scale questionnaire.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Biopsy
  • Antibiotic

Keywords

  • Prostate Cancer
  • Biopsy
  • Complication
  • Randomization
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Oslo University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 810 studies on the registry; 148 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Clinical indication for prostate cancer

-

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with symptoms of urinary tract infection or positive findings on urine dipstic before biopsy
  • Patients with indwelling urethral catheter
  • Patients with immunodeficiency disorders
  • Patients with high risk for infective endocarditis [European Society of Cardiology]

    1. Patients with a prosthetic aortic or pulmonary valve
    2. Patients with previous infective endocarditis
    3. Patients with congenital heart disease who are cyanotic and those who have had palliative shunts/conduits/other prostheses
  • Patients with a history of thromboembolic disease
  • Patients with a history of allergy to the study drug
  • Patients who do not wish to participate in the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
550 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Transperineal prostate biopsy with antibiotic profylaxis

    Cefuroxim 1.5 g will be applied intramuscularly before prostate biopsy

    Procedure: Transperineal prostate biopsy with or without antibiotic prophylaxis

  • Experimental
    Transperineal prostate biopsy without antibiotic profylaxis

    No antibiotics will be used before or after prostate biopsy

    Procedure: Transperineal prostate biopsy with or without antibiotic prophylaxis

Interventions

  • ProcedureTransperineal prostate biopsy with or without antibiotic prophylaxis

    As described above.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of sepsis

    Post biopsy sepsis will be defined by SIRS criteria

    Time frame: Up to 30 days

  2. Incidence of post biopsy urinary tract infection

    Post biopsy urinary tract infection not demanding hospital admission within 30

    Time frame: Up to 30 days

Other outcomes

  1. Pain during the local anesthesia application

    Patients will be asked to mention the intensity of pain during the anesthesia using Visual Analog Score for pain, range: 0 to 10, the worse is 10.

    Time frame: Immediately after the intervention

  2. Pain during the prostate biopsy

    Patients will be asked to mention the intensity of pain during the prostate biopsy using Visual Analog Score for pain, range: 0 to 10, the worse is 10.

    Time frame: Immediately after the intervention

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Vivantes Klinikum am Urban
    Berlin, Germany
  • Oslo University Hospital, Aker
    Oslo, 0514, Norway
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jacewicz M, Gunzel K, Rud E, Sandbaek G, Magheli A, Busch J, Hinz S, Baco E. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no antibiotic prophylaxis in transperineal prostate biopsies (NORAPP): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Oct;22(10):1465-1471. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00373-5. Epub 2022 Jul 12. PubMed 35839791 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — All data generated during this study will be evaluated at Oslo University Hospital

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 7, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04146142
Lead sponsor
Oslo University Hospital
Collaborators
University of Oslo
Responsible party
Eduard Baco (Principal investigator, Oslo University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 31, 2019
Start date
Nov 11, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2021
Completion
Apr 30, 2021
Last update
Dec 7, 2021

Study contacts

Eduard Baco, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Erik Rud, MD,PhD
study chair · Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Karsten Gunzel, MD
study chair · Vivantes Klinkum Am Urban, Berlin, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion