CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04143685Updated Jan 29, 2020

Labor Induction With Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in Women With Premature Rupture of Membranes

An interventional study of Misoprostol and Oxytocin in Prelabor Rupture of Membranes and Premature Rupture of Membrane, sponsored by sammour.rami. Status unknown at 1 site in Israel. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-29.

Sponsored by sammour.rami · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study compares the rate of vaginal delivery after induction of labor with misoprostol versus oxytocin in women with prelabor rupture of membranes. Participants will be randomized to receive either oral misoprotsol every four hours until going into labor, or intravenous oxytocin in increasing dose.

Read the detailed description

Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin analogue commonly used for labor induction. It causes uterine contractions and ripening of the cervix. Oxytocin sold under the brand name Pitocin among others, is a medication made from the peptide oxytocin and is used to cause contraction of the uterus to start labor.

This randomized controlled trial will compare induction of labor in women with term premature rupture of the membranes and unripe cervix using misoprostol versus oxytocin. The primary outcome is the rate of vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes will include cesarean section rate, time interval from induction of labor to delivery, neonatal morbidity, patient satisfaction and side effects, as well as chorioamnionitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prelabor Rupture of Membranes
  • Premature Rupture of Membrane

Keywords

  • PROM
03

In context

Premature Birth

2,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Birth; 498 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 84 across 1,689 interventional studies indexed under Premature Birth.

Browse Premature Birth studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with sammour.rami as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Women in their 1st - 4th delivery
  • Term prelabor rupture of membranes (37+0 to 42+0 gestational age)
  • Vertex presentation
  • Singleton pregnancy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multiple pregnancy
  • Previous cesarean section
  • Chorioamnionitis on admission
  • >2 symptomatic uterine contractions in 10 minutes
  • Prostaglandins hypersensitivity
  • Contraindication for vaginal delivery
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    misoprostol

    misoprostol 50 mcg tablet by mouth every four hours for maximum dosage of six

    Drug: Misoprostol

  • Active comparator
    oxytocin

    Oxytocin 10 IU in 1000 mL Standard solution. Starting with 10 mL/hr infusion rate and increasing by 10mL/hr every 20 minutes until achieving 3-5 regular uterine contractions every 10 minutes (as recorded by cardiotocography)

    Drug: Oxytocin

Interventions

  • DrugMisoprostol

    Oral administration of cytotec every 4 hours until a maximum of 6 doses

    Also known as: Cytotec, PGE1

  • DrugOxytocin

    Intravenous infusion of Pitocin through an IVAC until delivery

    Also known as: Pitocin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Vaginal delivery rate

    Time frame: During delivery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Operative delivery rate, Cesarean section rate, time interval from induction of labor to delivery

    Time frame: During delivery

  2. chorioamnionitis rate

    intra-amniotic infection during or after delivery representing in possible combination of maternal fever, fetal tachycardia, maternal leukocytosis, Histopathologic evidence of infection or inflammation or both in the placenta, fetal membranes, or the umbilical cord vessels

    Time frame: During or after delivery up to 7 days

  3. Uterine tachysystole

    Time frame: During delivery

  4. Neonatal morbidity

    Apgar score, , ,

    Time frame: After delivery until discharge

  5. Neonatal morbidity

    Umbilical Cord Blood Gases

    Time frame: immediately after delivery

  6. Neonatal morbidity

    NICU admission

    Time frame: up to 7 days after delivery

  7. Neonatal morbidity

    Antibiotic administration

    Time frame: up to 7 days after delivery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Bnai Zion Medical Center
    Haifa, Israel
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 29, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04143685
Lead sponsor
sammour.rami
Responsible party
sammour.rami (Head of Obstetrics, Bnai Zion Medical Center) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 29, 2019
Start date
Dec 1, 2019
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 29, 2020

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion