CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04138147Updated Sep 18, 2020

Superficial Cervical Plexus Versus Retrolaminar Block in Parotid Surgeries

An interventional study of Superficial cervical plexus with auriculotemporal nerve blocks and Cervical retrolaminar with auriculotemporal nerve blocks in Supportive Care, sponsored by Mansoura University. Status unknown at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-09-18.

Sponsored by Mansoura University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2020), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The parotid gland receives sensory and autonomic innervation. Sensory innervation is supplied by the auriculotemporal nerve (gland) and the great auricular nerve (fascia). The parasympathetic innervation to the parotid gland begins with the glossopharyngeal nerve. This nerve synapses with the otic ganglion. The auriculotemporal nerve then carries parasympathetic fibers from the otic ganglion to the parotid gland. Parasympathetic stimulation increase saliva production. Sympathetic innervation from the superior cervical ganglion, part of the paravertebral chain

Read the detailed description

Detailed Description:

The aim of this study will be comparing efficacy of superficial cervical plexus block with cervical retro laminar block both combined with auriculotemporal nerve block in parotid surgeries.

Technique of ultrasound guided auriculotemporal nerve block:

The patient will be placed in a supine position with each side facing up. The temporomandibular joint will be identified after palpitation. A high frequency linear ultrasound transducer (7-12 megahertz) will be attached to ultrasound machine (SIEMENS ACUSON P300, Germany) will be placed between the tragus and temporomandibular joint. Color Doppler imaging will be used to identify the superficial temporal artery. The injection needle will be inserted anterior to the tragus posterior to the temporal artery (out-of-plane approach) 1 to 1.5 cm till reaching the periosteum. The reason of out-of-plane approach is that the superficial temporal artery is in the needle entry of in-plane procedure during auriculo-temporal nerve block. Following negative aspiration local anesthetic will be injected in fractionated doses following intermittent aspiration.

Technique of ultrasound guided superficial cervical plexus block:

Standard precautions for the ultrasound guided nerve blocks performance will be done which include standard monitoring, the skin overlying the injection site will be free of signs of infection and after proper skin sterilization with an antiseptic solution and the probe surface in contact with the skin will be covered with a sterile adhesive dressing Patients will be in the supine position with the head turned slightly away from the side to be blocked to facilitate operator access. The anesthesiologist will be at the patient's side at the level of the shoulder. Posterior in-plane approach to the superficial cervical plexus block will be done. In this approach, a high-frequency linear transducer (7-12 Megahertz) will be attached to ultrasound machine (SIEMENS ACUSON P300), the transducer will be placed in a transverse orientation across the neck with the probe marker facing medial (toward the thyroid cartilage). A 22-gauge needle will then be inserted at the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle at the level of the cricoid cartilage and advanced underneath the muscle belly toward the carotid artery. The needle tip will be positioned to inject local anesthetic deep to the sternocleidomastoid muscle along its tapering posterolateral border but superficial to the prevertebral fascia. Deeper injection should be avoided because it can result in a deep cervical plexus block. As much as 10 ml of local anesthetic will be used for this block.

Technique of ultrasound guided cervical retrolaminar block:

The patients will be in the lateral position. Patient neck will be slightly flexed forward, the anesthesiologist will stand behind the patient. Firstly, landmark will be the identification of cervical vertebrae number 7 as it is the largest and most prominent spinous process by palpation in axial plane. Then the high-frequency linear transducer (7-12 Megahertz) which attach to ultrasound machine (SIEMENS ACUSON P300), Ultrasound scanning will be performed while the probe in transverse position in the mid sagittal plane of cervical vertebrae number 7 spinous process. Then counting up the spinous processes till reaching the spinous process of cervical vertebrae number 4 and then the probe will be moved laterally 1 cm to image the left or right muscles. Identification of the echogenic (bright, reflective) laminae will be seen, above it muscles will be imaged. The splenius capitis lies deep to the trapezius and is a broad, flat muscle. The semispinalis capitis will be easily recognized as a long, strap-like muscle divided into 2 sections by an aponeurotic intersection. The deep neck muscle group has a distinctive tear drop shape (semispinalis cervicis, multifidus, and rotatores).

An in-plane approach by using a 22 gauge, 50 mm, echogenic needle. The needle will be introduced to reach the lamina. After negative aspiration the local anesthetic will be injected through the needle under real-time ultrasound visualization. The criteria for assessment of correct spread of the injectate will creating a plane/hypo-echoic.

02

Conditions studied

  • Supportive Care

Keywords

  • Cervical plexus,
  • Retrolaminar,
  • Auriculotemporal,
  • Parotid
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Mansoura University is the lead sponsor of 1,077 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status grade I and grade II.
  • Elective parotid surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Coagulopathy.
  • Psychiatric diseases.
  • Local skin infection and sepsis at site of the block.
  • Known intolerance to the study drugs.
  • Body Mass Index > 40 Kg/m2.
  • Central or peripheral neurological disease.
  • Previous neck surgery.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
28 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Superficial cervical plexus with auriculotemporal nerve blocks

    Procedure: Superficial cervical plexus with auriculotemporal nerve blocks

  • Experimental
    Cervical retrolaminar with auriculotemporal nerve blocks

    Procedure: Cervical retrolaminar with auriculotemporal nerve blocks

Interventions

  • ProcedureSuperficial cervical plexus with auriculotemporal nerve blocks

    Superficial cervical plexus block using 10 ml bupivacaine 0.5%. Auriculotemporal nerve block using 3 ml bupivacaine 0.5%.

  • ProcedureCervical retrolaminar with auriculotemporal nerve blocks

    Cervical retrolaminar block using 10 ml bupivacaine 0.5%. Auriculotemporal nerve block using 3 ml bupivacaine 0.5%.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The time of first analgesic request post-operative.

    The time of first analgesic request in hours.

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperative.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total post-operative opioid requirement.

    Total post-operative morphine requirement in milligrams..

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperative.

  2. The number of patients required rescue post-operative opioid analgesia..

    in number.

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperative.

  3. Post-operative pain scale.

    by Visual analogue scale (VAS): (where 0 means no pain- while 100 mm is the worst pain) at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours.

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperative.

  4. Intra-operative fentanyl consumption.

    in micro grams.

    Time frame: Intraoperative (2 hours).

  5. Heart rate (HR).

    in beat/minutes, recorded basal, intraoperative: after the block 15 min and 30 min then every 30 minutes till the end of surgery, then postoperative at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours.

    Time frame: Intraoperative (2 hours), postoperative for 24 hours.

  6. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP).

    Non invasive mean arterial pressure, in mmHg, recorded intraoperative: basal, after the block at 15 min and 30 min then every 30 minutes till the end of surgery, then postoperative at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours.

    Time frame: Intraoperative (2 hours), postoperative for 24 hours.

  7. Intra-operative atracurium consumption

    in milligrams.

    Time frame: Intraoperative (2 hours).

  8. The concentration of isoflurane.

    in percent, recorded after the block every 30 minutes till the end of surgery.

    Time frame: Intraoperative (2 hours).

  9. Sensory block assessment.

    Define the number of blocked dermatomes at post anesthesia care unit by skin pinprick. sensation at dermatomal distribution.

    Time frame: 1 hour post-operative.

  10. The block procedural duration.

    In minutes.

    Time frame: 30 minutes.

  11. Post-operative complication rate (nausea, vomiting and headache)

    In number.

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperative.

  12. Assessment of diaphragmatic dysfunction.

    Using ultrasound assessment,

    Time frame: 1 hour postoperative.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU)
    Mansoura, Dakahlia 35516, Egypt
    • Alaa Mazy, MD · Contact · alaa_mazy@yahoo.com · 01140065052
    • Ghada M Mohammed, Master · Principal investigator
    • Nahla S El-Ebahnasawy, MD · Sub investigator
    • Alaa M Mazy, MD · Sub investigator
    • Tarek A Ibrahim, MD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — after publication.

Supporting information: Csr

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04138147
Lead sponsor
Mansoura University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 24, 2019
Start date
Nov 20, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2020

Study contacts

Ghada S Mohammed, Master
Contact
dr_adamghada@yahoo.com
00201090085600
Alaa M Mazy, MD
Contact
alaa_mazy@yahoo.com
+201140065052
Alaa M Mazy
study director · Oncology Center, Mansoura University, Egypt.

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion