An interventional study of Spine surgery in Lumbar Disc Disease and Surgical Procedure, Unspecified, sponsored by GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-16.
Sponsored by GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
Investigators team propose to evaluate the impact of the use of intraoperative scanning coupled with Stryker navigation, compared to the conventional fluoroscopy technique, on the accuracy of pedicle screws, in instrumented spinal surgery, by a randomised prospective study, in terms of pedicular screw accuracy. We will also evaluate the radiation exposure of the neurosurgical team and the patient in these two techniques.
The use of pedicle screws in spinal surgery has seen a major advance in recent decades, allowing for greater biomechanical stability and higher fusion rates. In order to avoid any malposition that could cause neurological, vascular and visceral injuries and compromise this mechanical stability, imaging-guided surgical techniques have been developed. These are aimed at improving the positioning accuracy of pedicle screws to reduce these risks and improve mechanical stability and intervertebral fusion. Fluoroscopic examinations had long been the mainstay of intraoperative control imaging until the development of computer-assisted techniques. However, despite intraoperative examination, pedicle screw misalignment remains very common and even experienced surgeons can deviate screws in 5 to 20% of cases when using a standard fluoroscopic examination image. Thus, navigation techniques coupled with an intraoperative scanner, involving the acquisition of 2D images of the surgical field, have been developed. These techniques allow the neurosurgeon to navigate the spine and thus allow an improvement in the positioning accuracy of the pedicle screws. The correlate is an improvement of the safety of the procedure (reduction of complications) but also an optimisation of the biomechanical efficiency of the osteosynthesis.
With respect to the radiation emitted during navigated spinal surgery coupled with an intraoperative scan, some comparative studies have shown that the radiation rates received by the neurosurgical team and the patient were lower than the radiation rates received in conventional surgery. To date, few studies combining the analysis of the pedicular screw accuracy rate and the radiation rate transmitted to the neurosurgical team and patients have been published.
Therefore the team propose to evaluate the impact of the use of intraoperative scanning (BODYTom, Samsung) coupled with Stryker navigation, compared to the conventional fluoroscopy technique, on the accuracy of pedicle screws, in instrumented spinal surgery, by a randomised prospective study, in terms of pedicular screw accuracy. The investigator team will also evaluate the radiation exposure of the neurosurgical team and the patient in these two techniques.
21 studies on the registry are indexed under Intervertebral disc disease; 12 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 126 is above the median of 64 across 13 interventional studies indexed under Intervertebral disc disease.
Browse Intervertebral disc disease studies →GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche is the lead sponsor of 198 studies on the registry; 94 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
lumbar spine surgical procedure with guided pedicle screw placement coupled with intraoperative scanning (BODYTOM, Samsung).
Procedure: Spine surgery
lumbar spinal surgery with pedicle screw placement guided by fluoroscopy, a fluoroscopic control being performed with each set screw.
Procedure: Spine surgery
surgery with pedicle screw placement between L1 and S1
pedicle screw positioning
The accuracy of pedicle screw positioning will be evaluated on the early postoperative examination scan (within 48 hours after the intervention) and graded according to the following classification: * correctly positioned: pedicle screws perfectly positioned in the pedicle or with a deflection of less than 4mm. * poorly positioned: pedicle screws with a deflection greater than 4 mm.
Time frame: 48 hours
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche