CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04134975SCANRACHUpdated Jul 16, 2026

Evaluation of the Contribution of Intraoperative Scans Coupled With the Navigation for the Precision of the Positioning of the Pedicle Screws During a Lumbar Spine Surgery: a Prospective Randomised Study

An interventional study of Spine surgery in Lumbar Disc Disease and Surgical Procedure, Unspecified, sponsored by GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-16.

Sponsored by GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2018, registered Oct 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
126
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Investigators team propose to evaluate the impact of the use of intraoperative scanning coupled with Stryker navigation, compared to the conventional fluoroscopy technique, on the accuracy of pedicle screws, in instrumented spinal surgery, by a randomised prospective study, in terms of pedicular screw accuracy. We will also evaluate the radiation exposure of the neurosurgical team and the patient in these two techniques.

Read the detailed description

The use of pedicle screws in spinal surgery has seen a major advance in recent decades, allowing for greater biomechanical stability and higher fusion rates. In order to avoid any malposition that could cause neurological, vascular and visceral injuries and compromise this mechanical stability, imaging-guided surgical techniques have been developed. These are aimed at improving the positioning accuracy of pedicle screws to reduce these risks and improve mechanical stability and intervertebral fusion. Fluoroscopic examinations had long been the mainstay of intraoperative control imaging until the development of computer-assisted techniques. However, despite intraoperative examination, pedicle screw misalignment remains very common and even experienced surgeons can deviate screws in 5 to 20% of cases when using a standard fluoroscopic examination image. Thus, navigation techniques coupled with an intraoperative scanner, involving the acquisition of 2D images of the surgical field, have been developed. These techniques allow the neurosurgeon to navigate the spine and thus allow an improvement in the positioning accuracy of the pedicle screws. The correlate is an improvement of the safety of the procedure (reduction of complications) but also an optimisation of the biomechanical efficiency of the osteosynthesis.

With respect to the radiation emitted during navigated spinal surgery coupled with an intraoperative scan, some comparative studies have shown that the radiation rates received by the neurosurgical team and the patient were lower than the radiation rates received in conventional surgery. To date, few studies combining the analysis of the pedicular screw accuracy rate and the radiation rate transmitted to the neurosurgical team and patients have been published.

Therefore the team propose to evaluate the impact of the use of intraoperative scanning (BODYTom, Samsung) coupled with Stryker navigation, compared to the conventional fluoroscopy technique, on the accuracy of pedicle screws, in instrumented spinal surgery, by a randomised prospective study, in terms of pedicular screw accuracy. The investigator team will also evaluate the radiation exposure of the neurosurgical team and the patient in these two techniques.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Disc Disease
  • Surgical Procedure, Unspecified

Keywords

  • spin surgery
  • lumbar surgery
  • image guided surgery
  • radiation exposure
  • intraoperative navigation
03

In context

Intervertebral disc disease

21 studies on the registry are indexed under Intervertebral disc disease; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 126 is above the median of 64 across 13 interventional studies indexed under Intervertebral disc disease.

Browse Intervertebral disc disease studies →

Lead sponsor

GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche is the lead sponsor of 198 studies on the registry; 94 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female subject over the age of 18
  • Subject with lumbar degenerative pathology, requiring surgery with pedicle screw placement between L1 and S1, confirmed on MRI or preoperative scan
  • Well conducted medical treatment, at least 3 months, which did not allow pain sedation
  • Unprotected adult within the meaning of the law
  • Subject belonging to a health insurance scheme
  • Subject having signed their written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject who is a minor, pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding woman
  • Adult subject under legal protection, guardianship or deprivation of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
  • Subject hospitalised without consent
  • Medical contraindications to surgery and anaesthesia
  • Contraindication of a medical nature to an MRI (pace-maker) or a scan being carried out
  • Subject already treated by surgery for the same vertebral levels or adjacent levels
  • Subject with scoliosis with a Cobb angle of more than 10°.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
126 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Scanner Group

    lumbar spine surgical procedure with guided pedicle screw placement coupled with intraoperative scanning (BODYTOM, Samsung).

    Procedure: Spine surgery

  • Active comparator
    fluoroscopy group

    lumbar spinal surgery with pedicle screw placement guided by fluoroscopy, a fluoroscopic control being performed with each set screw.

    Procedure: Spine surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedureSpine surgery

    surgery with pedicle screw placement between L1 and S1

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. pedicle screw positioning

    The accuracy of pedicle screw positioning will be evaluated on the early postoperative examination scan (within 48 hours after the intervention) and graded according to the following classification: * correctly positioned: pedicle screws perfectly positioned in the pedicle or with a deflection of less than 4mm. * poorly positioned: pedicle screws with a deflection greater than 4 mm.

    Time frame: 48 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Clairval Private Hospital
    Marseille, Paca 13009, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04134975
Lead sponsor
GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 22, 2019
Start date
Oct 16, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 28, 2022
Completion
Jun 28, 2022
Last update
Jul 16, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion