ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04641039Updated Apr 22, 2026

Postoperative Scar in the Control Excess of Mobility Induced by Annulus Removal on Inserting a Lumbar Disc Prosthesis

An interventional study of Anterior lumbar disc annulus removal versus replacement in Lumbar Disc Disease, sponsored by University of Valencia. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-22.

Sponsored by University of Valencia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2020; still recruiting 6 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To implant a complete lumbar disc prosthesis removal of the anterior portion of the annulus fibrosus is required. As the anterior portion of the annulus limits the movement in extension and axial rotation, we would like to know how much increase these two disc movements and also the effect on the postoperative prevertebral scar on the reduction of these abnormal movement ranges. We also aim to see if repairing intraoperatively the anterior portion of the annulus has any advantage in the final result achieved.

Read the detailed description

To implant a complete lumbar disc prosthesis removal of the anterior portion of the annulus fibrosus is required. It is known that the anterior portion of the annulus limits the movement in extension and axial rotation, so removal of this section of the annulus fibrosus will increase the range of movement in extension and axial rotation. As far as the investigators know, this increase in movement ranges has not been measured objectively in alive patients. Also the investigators would like to know if the postoperative prevertebral scar reduces an to what extent these abnormal movement ranges. This could help the investigators to decide when patients should be allowed to regain normal activities and specially, when the patients should be allowed to start working again. The investigators also aim to see if repairing intraoperatively the anterior portion of the annulus has any advantage in the final result achieved, and thus represents an improvement or not in the care of these patients

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Disc Disease

Keywords

  • Annulus fibrosus
  • Lumbar disc prosthesis
  • Lumbar disc replacement
  • Range of movement lumbar disc prosthesis
  • Quality of life after lumbar disc replacement
03

In context

Intervertebral disc disease

63 studies on the registry are indexed under Intervertebral disc disease; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 78 across 37 interventional studies indexed under Intervertebral disc disease.

Browse Intervertebral disc disease studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Valencia is the lead sponsor of 357 studies on the registry; 75 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Minimum age of 18 years and maximum of 50 years, given that above that age there is usually degenerative pathology of the lumbar joint facets, which can confuse the symptoms and make it difficult to interpret the results.
  • Pathology compatible with chronic low back pain accompanied or not by radiculopathy originating in one or a maximum of two degenerated intervertebral discs and without signs of degeneration / osteoarthritis of the lumbar joint facets.
  • The type of lumbar pain must be discogenic, that is, worsen in flexion and not in extension, and in loading, as well as having a truncal distribution with possible anterior radiation towards the English or genital region.
  • Radiological confirmation by lumbar MRI study of lumbar discopathy of one or a maximum of two lumbar levels.
  • Absence in simple radiology studies of signs of vertebral instability or listhesis of the levels to be treated.
  • Absence of response for 6 weeks to conservative, non-surgical treatment, or presence of progressive symptoms. The treatment would also be carried out despite the absence of this study and the existence of the study does not condition in any way the treatment of the patients
  • Not having undergone any prior treatment of the type of microdiscectomy, laminectomy or lumbar arthrodesis, although these have been carried out at different levels than those involved on this occasion
  • Ability of the patient to comply with the proposed monitoring program
  • Patient's ability to follow the postoperative care program
  • Granting of

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Signs of arthropathy of the lumbar joint facets, osteoporosis, previous interventions on the lumbar spine
  • Deformity or instability of the lumbar spine
  • Lumbar canal stenosis
  • Previous intervention on lumbar spine
  • Previous lumbar spinal fracture
  • Mobile spondylolisthesis> 2 mm in translation and / or more than 11 ° angular difference with respect to the adjacent level on neutral vertical or flexion-extension radiographs
  • Severe osteoporosis
  • Spinal
  • Metabolic bone disease that could interfere with the implant or the surgical procedure
  • Rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, or other disease that affects the musculoskeletal system
  • Other conditions or anatomical alterations that make the treatment of the anterior approach to the lumbar spine unfeasible
  • Known allergy to stainless steel, titanium or their alloys
  • Fixed or permanent neurological deficit
  • Active systemic infection at any time or ongoing preventive treatment for it, infection in the surgical site, or
  • Abusive drug or alcohol use
  • Uncontrolled seizure disorder
  • Psychiatric illness that could interfere with your participation in the study
  • Participation in a current research study or in the 3 months prior to surgery
  • History of or current malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer), unless the patient has been treated for curative purposes and no clinical signs or symptoms have been observed for at least 5 years
  • Obesity ( or BMI> 35)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Anterior annulus removal

    In these patients the anterior portion of the annulus fibrosus will be removed when inserting a complete lumbar disc prosthesis

    Procedure: Anterior lumbar disc annulus removal versus replacement

  • Active comparator
    Anterior annulus replacement

    In these group of patients the anterior portion of the annulus fibrosus will be opened up in to flaps hinged lateraly and replaced once the complete lumbar disc prosthesis is inserted

    Procedure: Anterior lumbar disc annulus removal versus replacement

Interventions

  • ProcedureAnterior lumbar disc annulus removal versus replacement

    Owestry scale, SF12, Facet joint arthritis measured with Pathria scale, discal degeneration measured with Modic and Phirrmann scales

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Range of spinal segment movement after lumbar disc prosthesis insertion in L4-L5 lumbar disc

    The investigators will analyze preoperatively and postoperatively at 3, 6 and 12 months the range of movement of the L4-L5 lumbar disc after insertion of a complete lumbar disc prosthesis

    Time frame: One year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Milby AH, Anakwenze OA, Balderston RA. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Nov 1;34(23):2510-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181af2622. PubMed 19927100 ↗
  • Huang YJ, Zhao SJ, Zhang Q, Nong LM, Xu NW. Comparison of lumbar pedicular dynamic stabilisation systems versus fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease: A meta-analysis. Acta Orthop Belg. 2017 Mar;83(1):180-193. PubMed 29322911 ↗
  • Frelinghuysen P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr. Lumbar total disc replacement part I: rationale, biomechanics, and implant types. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005 Jul;36(3):293-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.02.014. PubMed 15950689 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04641039
Responsible party
Vicente Vanaclocha (Profesor of Neurosurgery, University of Valencia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 23, 2020
Start date
Nov 1, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 28, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 28, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 22, 2026

Study contacts

Vicente Vanaclocha, MDPhD
Contact
vivava@uv.es; vvanaclo@hotmail.com
+ 34 963 13 18 00 ext. 438500
Teresa Moratal, Secretary
Contact
ceicvalencia_hgv@gva.es
+ 34 963 13 18 00 ext. 437334

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion