ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04124367IMPULSEUpdated Jul 28, 2022

IMPULSE - StIMulation of Brain Plasticity to Improve Upper Limb Recovery After StrokE

A Phase 2 interventional study of Cerebrolysin and non-invasive brain stimulation in Chronic Stroke and Subacute Stroke, sponsored by Ever Neuro Pharma GmbH. Terminated at 1 site in Austria. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-28.

Sponsored by Ever Neuro Pharma GmbH · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
for strategic and pandemic reasons
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
4
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Stroke is a leading cause of adult long-term disability worldwide. Recovery of arm and hand function after stroke is limited to about 50% of patients and full recovery is achieved in only 12% of stroke survivors by 6 months after stroke. Within the first 8-12 weeks post-stroke, a proportional recovery of 70%, corresponding to good recovery, may be achieved, but at later stages no major gain is observed with current therapy practices. Accordingly, there is a need to find new potential therapeutic tools to enhance post-stroke motor recovery. Rehabilitation supported by neuroplastic intervention is a new and pragmatic therapeutic approach in the treatment of stroke, giving way to a concept of 'recovery enhancers'.

The objective of this study is to assess whether an additional therapy with Cerebrolysin and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) increases the success of conventional rehabilitation therapy in subacute and chronic stroke patients with unexploited potential for functional recovery despite intact structural and functional pathways in the brain.

Hypothesis:

The hypothesis is that the combination of Cerebrolysin and atDCS facilitates motor learning in subacute and chronic stroke patients. Accordingly, motor function recovery at day 21 post-baseline is expected to be higher in the verum group (conventional rehabilitation + task-specific motor training + Cerebrolysin + atDCS) as compared to the control group (conventional rehabilitation + task-specific motor training + placebo + sham-transcranial direct current stimulation).

The primary objective is to show a significantly higher proportional recovery rate in the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) at day 21 post-baseline in the verum group as compared to the control group.

The secondary objective is to assess the impact of this neuroplastic intervention on finger dexterity (Nine-hole peg test - 9HPT), hand grip strength, and neurological deficits (National Institutes of Healths Stroke Scale - NIHSS) at the end of therapy (day 21 post-baseline). Safety data are collected throughout the study and thereafter in case of ongoing serious adverse events (SAEs) at study endpoint.

Optional secondary parameters include electroencephalography (EEG) parameters and Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) status analyses to document plastic changes in the brain, in particular changes of the cortical network functionality during neurorehabilitation, and to assess the impact of neuroplastic intervention on the BDNF synthesis rate as well as the influence of different BDNF polymorphisms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Stroke
  • Subacute Stroke

Browse trials for

03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 4 is below the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Ever Neuro Pharma GmbH is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-80 years of age, both inclusive, of all sexes
  • 8 weeks to 12 months after a first-ever hemispheric subcortical ischemic stroke, confirmed by imaging
  • Pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0 or 1
  • Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) score 13-50, both inclusive
  • Shoulder Abduction Finger Extension (SAFE) score ≥5
  • Patient participates voluntarily and gave written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Disease-related:

o Study procedures:

  1. Severe sensory deficits (score of 2 on item 8 of the NIHSS)
  2. Severe aphasia (a score of ≥2 on item 9 of the NIHSS)
  3. Severe neglect (a score of 2 on item 11 of the NIHSS)
  4. Co-morbid conditions such as fractures, osteoarthritis, fixed or severely interfering contraction or deformity in the affected limb, polyneuropathy and/or ischemic peripheral disease if the sensorimotor functions of the upper extremities are affected, other neurological disease(s) or known brain abnormalities, acute coronary syndrome, severe heart disease ( class III or IV), cancer, severe liver disease (hepatic disease associated with coagulopathy [ prolonged beyond the normal range] and bleeding risk including cirrhotic patients with B and C), and other major medical conditions that, in the opinion of the site investigator, might influence efficacy or safety assessment
  5. \<20
  6. Current drug or alcohol use or dependency that would interfere with adherence to study procedures
  7. Participation in another interventional study

    • Spasticity:
  8. Major spasticity as indicated by the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale >2/4 in either elbow flexors, wrist flexors or finger flexors of the affected limb
  9. Injection of botulinum toxin to the affected upper limb in the last three months, or the need of an injection of botulinum toxin anytime during the study period
  10. Injection of phenol to the affected upper limb in the last six months, or the need of an injection of phenol anytime during the study period

    Exposure-related:

  11. Pacemaker or brain stimulator
  12. Implanted intracranial metals in the stimulation area such as clipping, coilings, ventriculo-peritoneal shunts, endoprosthesis, cochlear implant
  13. Scalp wounds or infections in the area of stimulation
  14. Any condition that would represent a for Cerebrolysin administration:

    • to one of the components of the drug
    • epilepsy
    • severe renal impairment (estimated [eGFR] \<30 ml/min/1.73 m2 as assessed at local laboratory within one month before screening)
  15. Breastfeeding; pregnant or trying to become pregnant
  16. Concomitant medications

    • with potential negative effects on cortical excitability or plasticity (e.g. psycholeptics (ATC class N05), antiepileptics, neuroleptics, benzodiazepines, dextromethorphan)
    • with potential positive effects on cortical excitability or plasticity (e.g. SSRIs, SNRIs, dopaminergic preparations, memantine, AChEIs, amphetamines) - except if the patient is on a stable dose for a minimum of four weeks. Special attention should be given to possible additive effects when Cerebrolysin is used in conjunction with antidepressants/MAO inhibitors. High doses of MAO inhibitors in combination with higher dosages of Cerebrolysin (30-40 ml) have been reported to increase blood pressure.
    • with neuroprotective/neurotrophic/nootropic effects (e.g. ginkgo biloba, erythropoietin, citicoline, amantadine, piracetam)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
4 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Verum

    Drug: Cerebrolysin · Device: non-invasive brain stimulation

  • Placebo comparator
    Control

    Drug: Placebo · Device: sham intervention

Interventions

  • 30 ml once daily (+70 ml 0.9% saline)

  • Devicenon-invasive brain stimulation

    2 mA/35 cm² for 2x20 minutes, once daily

    Also known as: atDCS

  • DrugPlacebo

    100 ml once daily 0.9% saline

  • Devicesham intervention

    0 mA/35 cm² for 2x20 minutes, once daily Run-in phase consisting of ramp-up (10 seconds), stimulation (10 seconds), and ramp-down (10 seconds).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)

    The ARAT assesses upper limb functioning. The ARAT consists of 19 items grouped into four subscales: grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement. The total score on the ARAT ranges from 0 to 57, with the lowest score indicating that no movements can be performed, and the upper score indicating normal performance.

    Time frame: Day 21

Secondary outcomes

  1. Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT)

    The NHPT is used to measure finger dexterity. The NHPT is composed of a square board with 9 pegs. At one end of the board are holes for the pegs to fit in to, and at the other end is a shallow round dish to store the pegs. The NHPT is administered by asking the patient to take the pegs from a container, one by one, and placing them into the holes on the board, as quickly as possible. Patients must then remove the pegs from the holes, one by one, and replace them back into the container. Patients are scored based on the time taken to complete the test activity, recorded in seconds.

    Time frame: Day 21

  2. Hand grip dynamometry

    Hand grip dynamometry measures grip strength. The best out of three strength tests of the impaired hand is used as resultant score. A score is taken with the non-affected hand, followed by the impaired hand.

    Time frame: Day 21

  3. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)

    The NIHSS is a 15-item impairment scale, intended to evaluate neurologic outcome and degree of recovery for patients with stroke. Total scores on the NIHSS range from 0 - 42, with higher values reflecting more severe cerebral infarcts and correspondingly more severe neurological impairment.

    Time frame: Day 21

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Klinik Pirawarth
    Bad Pirawarth, 2222, Austria
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 28, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04124367
Lead sponsor
Ever Neuro Pharma GmbH
Collaborators
VASCage GmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 11, 2019
Start date
Jun 25, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 21, 2022
Completion
Mar 21, 2022
Last update
Jul 28, 2022

Study contacts

Andreas Winkler, MD, MSc
principal investigator · Klinik Pirawarth

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cerebrolysin

Start the discussion