ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00947531VascDemUpdated Feb 21, 2024Results posted

A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of 20 ml Cerebrolysin in Patients With Vascular Dementia

A Phase 4 interventional study of Cerebrolysin and 0.9% Saline Solution in Vascular Dementia, sponsored by Ever Neuro Pharma GmbH. Completed at 21 sites in Russian Federation. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-21.

Sponsored by Ever Neuro Pharma GmbH · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
242
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical trial was performed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of two 4 week treatment courses of daily intravenous administration of Cerebrolysin (20mL [milliliter] IV [intravenous] per day). The study was performed as prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicentre study with 2 study groups.

Group 1: 20 mL Cerebrolysin and 100 mg (milligram) acetylsalicylic acid Group 2: Placebo (0.9% NaCl [sodium chloride]) and 100 mg acetylsalicylic acid The study drug was given once daily by intravenous infusion (20ml in 250ml saline solution) for 4 weeks on five consecutive days per week. This treatment regimen was repeated after a two-month treatment-free interval. Acetylsalicylic acid was given orally, once daily throughout the study duration of 24 weeks.

Altogether five clinical evaluation visits at Baseline (day 0) and at week 4, 12, 16, and 24 were necessary.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vascular Dementia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Dementia, Vascular

183 studies on the registry are indexed under Dementia, Vascular; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 242 is above the median of 123 across 116 interventional studies indexed under Dementia, Vascular.

Browse Dementia, Vascular studies →

Lead sponsor

Ever Neuro Pharma GmbH is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men or women between 50 and 85 years
  • Clinical diagnosis of vascular dementia according to NINDS-AIREN criteria
  • CT or MRI results compatible with clinical diagnosis
  • score between 10 and 24, both inclusive
  • Modified Hachinski Ischemic Score >4
  • Hamilton Depression Scale score of less than or equal to 15
  • Adequate visual and auditory acuity to allow neuropsychological testing
  • given by the patient and/or the next-of-kin

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Gastric ulcer associated with intolerance of acetylsalicylic acid treatment
  • Severe psychotic features, schizophrenia, depression, agitation or behavioral problems within the last three months that could lead to difficulty complying with the protocol
  • Any severe systemic illness or unstable medical condition that could lead to difficulty complying with the protocol or significantly limits life span.
  • Patients who in the investigator's opinion, would not comply with study procedures
  • Any significant neurological disease other than vascular dementia, such as Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, Huntington's disease, normal pressure hydrocephalus, brain tumor, progressive supranuclear palsy, seizure disorder, subdural hematoma, or multiple sclerosis
  • History of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence within the past two years
  • Patients with a history of systemic cancer within the past two years
  • Severe congestive heart failure or malignant, uncontrollable hypertension
  • Participation in a clinical trial with an drug in the past four weeks
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
242 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cerebrolysin

    Drug: Cerebrolysin

  • Placebo comparator
    0.9% Saline Solution

    Drug: 0.9% Saline Solution

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in ADAS-cog+ (Alzheimer's Disease Assesment Scale - Cognitive Subpart) at Week 24

    The ADAS-COG+ is a psychometric instrument used to evaluate memory, attention, reasoning, language, orientation and praxis. The score ranges from 0 to 85 with 85 being the worst score. A negative change indicates cognitive improvement.

    Time frame: baseline and week 24

  2. CIBIC+ (Clinicians Interview-based Impression of Change) Score at Week 24

    This rating scale is based on the health care provider's "general clinical impressions" with the informant input (i.e. family members). It evaluates global function and is scored from 1 (marked improvement) to 7 (marked worsening).

    Time frame: week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in ADAS-COG+ (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subpart)

    The modified Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-COG+) is a psychometric instrument used by a neuropsychologist that evaluates memory, attention, reasoning, language, orientation and praxis.

    Time frame: week 4, 12, 16

  2. ADAS-COG+ Response

    A patient with an improvement from baseline of ≥ 4 points in the ADAS-COG+ score at a particular visit is considered to have an ADAS-COG+ response at that visit.

    Time frame: week 4, 12, 16, 24

  3. Change From Baseline for Original ADAS-COG

    The Original Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-COG) is comprised of items 1-11 of the modified ADAS-COG+.

    Time frame: week 4, 12, 16, 24

  4. CIBIC+ Score

    The Clinician Interview-based Impression of Change (CIBIC+) score is assigned by an experienced physician familiar with the manifestations of dementia after interviewing the patient and the caregiver.

    Time frame: week 4, 12, 16

  5. CIBIC+ Response

    A patient with a CIBIC+ score of 1 to 3 at a particular visit is considered to have a CIBIC+ response at that visit. Patients with a score of 0, indicating that the assessment was not performed, are considered to be non-responders.

    Time frame: week 4, 12, 16, 24

  6. CIBIS+ (Clinicians Interview-Based Impression of Severity)

    The Clinician Interview-based Impression of Disease Severity (CIBIS+) score is assigned by an experienced physician, familiar with the manifestations of dementia, after interviewing the patient and the caregiver.

    Time frame: week 24

  7. Change From Baseline in MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination) Score

    The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is a frequently used screening instrument for clinical trials conducted in patients with Alzheimer's Disease. It evaluates orientation, registration, attention and calculation, recall and language.

    Time frame: week 4, 12, 16, 24

  8. Change From Baseline in ADCS-ADL (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Scale)

    The ADCS-ADL is a measure of functional disability. The ADCS-ADL assessment of activities of daily living is based on an interview with the caregiver.

    Time frame: week 4, 12, 16, 24

  9. Change From Baseline in Trail-making Test

    The Trail-making test is a frequently used instrument for the assessment of executive function.

    Time frame: week 4, 12, 16, 24

  10. Change From Baseline in Clock-drawing Test

    The Clock-drawing test is a frequently used screening instrument for dementia drug studies. It evaluates executive function of demented patients.

    Time frame: week 4, 12, 16, 24

  11. Combined Response, i.e. Response in ADAS-COG+ and CIBIC+

    Time frame: week 4, 12, 16, 24

07

Results

Posted Jul 28, 2009

Participant flow

Date of recruitment period: 24-Oct-2006 - 02-Feb-2007 Type of location: Hospitals, Medical Universities, Medical Military Academy, Research Institutes

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCerebrolysin0.9% Saline Solution
Started121121
Completed107110
Not completed1411
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject107
Withdrew: Administrative reason01
Withdrew: Adverse event22
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy10
Withdrew: Other11

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in ADAS-cog+ (Alzheimer's Disease Assesment Scale - Cognitive Subpart) at Week 24

The ADAS-COG+ is a psychometric instrument used to evaluate memory, attention, reasoning, language, orientation and praxis. The score ranges from 0 to 85 with 85 being the worst score. A negative change indicates cognitive improvement.

Time frame:
baseline and week 24
Reported as:
Mean · points on a scale
Change From Baseline in ADAS-cog+ (Alzheimer's Disease Assesment Scale - Cognitive Subpart) at Week 24
points on a scaleCerebrolysin0.9% Saline Solution
Change From Baseline in ADAS-cog+ (Alzheimer's Disease Assesment Scale - Cognitive Subpart) at Week 24-10.60 ± 7.77-4.49 ± 8.13
Statistical analysis
  • Cerebrolysin vs 0.9% Saline Solution · ANCOVA · p = < 0.0001 (P-value obtained from the F-test statistic of Cerebrolysin versus Placebo as part of ANCOVA (analysis of covariance). No adjustment for multiple comparisons was needed. The overall significance level alpha was fixed at alpha = 0.05 (two-sided).) · Mean difference (final values): -6.17 · 95% CI -8.22 to -4.13The study was designed to show significant differences in each of the two primary variables. No adjustment for multiple comparisons was needed.
PrimaryCIBIC+ (Clinicians Interview-based Impression of Change) Score at Week 24

This rating scale is based on the health care provider's "general clinical impressions" with the informant input (i.e. family members). It evaluates global function and is scored from 1 (marked improvement) to 7 (marked worsening).

Time frame:
week 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
CIBIC+ (Clinicians Interview-based Impression of Change) Score at Week 24
ParticipantsCerebrolysin0.9% Saline Solution
Marked improvement72
Moderate improvement4314
Minimal improvement3827
No change2052
Minimal worsening916
Moderate worsening04
Marked worsening00
SecondaryChange From Baseline in ADAS-COG+ (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subpart)

The modified Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-COG+) is a psychometric instrument used by a neuropsychologist that evaluates memory, attention, reasoning, language, orientation and praxis.

Time frame:
week 4, 12, 16

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryADAS-COG+ Response

A patient with an improvement from baseline of ≥ 4 points in the ADAS-COG+ score at a particular visit is considered to have an ADAS-COG+ response at that visit.

Time frame:
week 4, 12, 16, 24

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryChange From Baseline for Original ADAS-COG

The Original Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-COG) is comprised of items 1-11 of the modified ADAS-COG+.

Time frame:
week 4, 12, 16, 24

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryCIBIC+ Score

The Clinician Interview-based Impression of Change (CIBIC+) score is assigned by an experienced physician familiar with the manifestations of dementia after interviewing the patient and the caregiver.

Time frame:
week 4, 12, 16

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryCIBIC+ Response

A patient with a CIBIC+ score of 1 to 3 at a particular visit is considered to have a CIBIC+ response at that visit. Patients with a score of 0, indicating that the assessment was not performed, are considered to be non-responders.

Time frame:
week 4, 12, 16, 24

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryCIBIS+ (Clinicians Interview-Based Impression of Severity)

The Clinician Interview-based Impression of Disease Severity (CIBIS+) score is assigned by an experienced physician, familiar with the manifestations of dementia, after interviewing the patient and the caregiver.

Time frame:
week 24

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryChange From Baseline in MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination) Score

The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is a frequently used screening instrument for clinical trials conducted in patients with Alzheimer's Disease. It evaluates orientation, registration, attention and calculation, recall and language.

Time frame:
week 4, 12, 16, 24

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryChange From Baseline in ADCS-ADL (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Scale)

The ADCS-ADL is a measure of functional disability. The ADCS-ADL assessment of activities of daily living is based on an interview with the caregiver.

Time frame:
week 4, 12, 16, 24

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryChange From Baseline in Trail-making Test

The Trail-making test is a frequently used instrument for the assessment of executive function.

Time frame:
week 4, 12, 16, 24

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clock-drawing Test

The Clock-drawing test is a frequently used screening instrument for dementia drug studies. It evaluates executive function of demented patients.

Time frame:
week 4, 12, 16, 24

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryCombined Response, i.e. Response in ADAS-COG+ and CIBIC+
Time frame:
week 4, 12, 16, 24

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cerebrolysin——0/117 (0%)
0.9% Saline Solution——0/115 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventCerebrolysin0.9% Saline Solution
Pyelonephritis acuteInfections and infestations1/1170/115
Lung neoplasm malignantNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/1170/115
Rectosigmoid cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/1170/115

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Cerebrolysin0.9% Saline SolutionTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years383977
>=65 years8382165
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Cerebrolysin0.9% Saline SolutionTotal
Mean67.1 ± 8.067.6 ± 8.067.3 ± 8.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cerebrolysin0.9% Saline SolutionTotal
Female8272154
Male394988
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Cerebrolysin0.9% Saline SolutionTotal
Russian Federation121121242
08

Study locations

21 sites
  • Chita State Medical Academy/Regional Psychiatric Hospital No. 2
    Chita, Russian Federation
  • Chita State Medical Academy/Veterans Hospital
    Chita, Russian Federation
  • Irkutsk State Institute of Postgraduate Education/Regional Clinical Hospital
    Irkutsk, Russian Federation
  • Kazan State Medical University/Municipal Clinical Hospital No. 6
    Kazan, Russian Federation
  • Kazan State Medical University/Republican Clinical Hospital
    Kazan, Russian Federation
  • Kursk Medical University/Kursk Regional Clinical Hospital
    Kursk, Russian Federation
  • I. M. Sechenov Moscow Medical Academy
    Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Mental Health Research Center of RAMS/Psychiatric Clinical Hospital No. 15
    Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Mental Health Research Center of RAMS
    Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education/S. P. Botkin Municipal Clinical Hospital
    Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Russian State Medical University/N. I. Pirogov Municipal Clinical Hospital No. 1
    Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Scientific Research Institute of Neurology of RAMS
    Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Municipal Clinical Hospital No. 5
    Nizhniy Novgorod, Russian Federation
  • N. A. Semashko Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital
    Nizhniy Novgorod, Russian Federation
  • Central Municipal Hospital
    Reutov, Russian Federation
  • Saratov Regional Psychiatric Hospital of Snt. Sofia
    Saratov, Russian Federation
  • I. P. Pavlov St. Petersburg State Medical University
    St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
  • S. M. Kirkov Medical Military Academy of the Ministry of Defense of RF
    St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
  • V. M. Bekhterev St. Petersburg Scientific Research Psychoneurological Institute
    St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
  • Bashkirian State Medical University/Emergency Medical Care Hospital
    Ufa, Russian Federation
  • Yaroslavl State Medical Academy/Yaroslavl Clinical Hospital No. 8
    Yaroslavl, Russian Federation
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Guekht AB, Moessler H, Novak PH, Gusev EI; Cerebrolysin Investigators. Cerebrolysin in vascular dementia: improvement of clinical outcome in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011 Jul-Aug;20(4):310-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.01.012. Epub 2010 Jul 24. PubMed 20656516 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00947531
Lead sponsor
Ever Neuro Pharma GmbH
Collaborators
acromion GmbH, Geny Research Corp.
First posted
Jul 28, 2009
Start date
Oct 2006
Completion
Aug 2007
Results posted
Jul 28, 2009
Last update
Feb 21, 2024

Study contacts

Philipp Novak, PhD
study director · EBEWE Neuro Pharma

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cerebrolysin

Start the discussion