An observational study in Tissue and Organ Procurement, sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center. Completed at 6 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-10.
Sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center · Observational
A considerable number of potential cDCD donors do not convert into actual organ donors because circulatory arrest does not occur within the predefined timeframe of warm ischemia after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. The main objective of this study is to determine parameters predicting time to death in potential cDCD patients.
Controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) is a major source of organs for transplantation. Even though there is a well-established cDCD program in the Netherlands, there is still a considerable number of potential donors not being converted into actual organ donors. A potential cDCD donor poses considerable challenges in terms of a) identification of those dying within the predefined timeframe of warm ischemia, after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment to circulatory arrest, b) managing them appropriately within the framework and resources of the intensive care unit, c) dealing with family expectations especially when failure to donation occurs, and d) efficient utilization of the organ procurement teams.
Factors associated with early circulatory collapse after treatment withdrawal include a younger age, non-triggered modes of artificial ventilation, high FiO2, the use of inotropes, and a low arterial pH. Another important factor which could influence the donor potential is end-of-life treatment. The practice of withdrawal of life support treatment (WLST) is highly variable between ICU's and countries. This influences the dying process and can thus have a large influence on the onset of cardio respiratory arrest. There is also wide variation in the use and dosage of additional sedation and analgesia during WLST and controversy exists regarding hastening or slowing down death.
Several attempts have been made to develop models to predict the time between treatment withdrawal and circulatory arrest, as this is crucial to a) proceed with organ donation, and b) the quality of the harvested organs. The selected patients however, where not always restricted to potential candidates for cDCD organ donation as patients with cancer and severe infection were also included.
Objective: Objectives of this study are: a) To determine parameters predicting time to death in potential cDCD patients b) To validate and update previous predicting models on time to death after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. c) To assess variation in withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the Netherlands and its influence on post mortal organ donor potential and actual post mortal organ donors.
Design and setting: Multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study of all potential cDCD patients of 3 university and 3 teaching hospitals in the Netherlands with diverse focus of attention
Methods: All potential cDCD patients participating in the cDCD protocol as defined by the Dutch Transplant Foundation admitted at the Intensive Care unit, will be included.
Participants: Mechanically ventilated ICU patients aged between 18 to 75 years. Brain dead patients will be excluded.
572 studies on the registry are indexed under Death; 111 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 400 is above the median of 314 across 293 observational studies indexed under Death.
Browse Death studies →Radboud University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 959 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.
Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
All mechanically ventilated patients admitted at the Intensive Care Unit, aged between 18 and 75 years old who are eligible to enter the organ procurement protocol of the Dutch Transplant Foundation.
Exclusion Criteria:
Duration (in minutes) on time to circulatory death after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, in cDCD patients
Development of a prediction tool to detect time to circulatory death (in minutes) in controlled donation after circulatory death patients (cDCD)
Time frame: 36 months
Incidence of circulatory death in 60 minutes
Number of patients with circulatory death within 60 minutes
Time frame: 36 months
Incidence of circulatory death in 120 and 180 minutes
Number of patients when circulatory death occurs within the timeframe of 120 and 180 minutes
Time frame: 36 months
Doses analgesia
Doses analgesia provided before and during withdrawal of life support in milligrams per hour
Time frame: 36 months
Doses sedation
Doses sedation provided before and during withdrawal of life support in milligrams per hour
Time frame: 36 months
Incidence of withdrawal of endotracheal tube
Number of endotracheal tubes removed
Time frame: 36 months
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Radboud University Medical Center