CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04118218RhizolyseUpdated Oct 8, 2019

Determination of Predictive Clinical Signs of Effective Rhizolysis Using the DFL Questionnaire.

An interventional study of Rhizolysis pain analysis in Rhizolysis and Diagnosis of Facet Joint Origin Lumbago, sponsored by Ramsay Générale de Santé. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-08.

Sponsored by Ramsay Générale de Santé · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2017, registered Oct 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rhizolysis or lumbar thermocoagulation is a therapeutic proposal for certain types of chronic lower back pain that is resistant to medical treatment and outside the field of surgical indications.

A previous study has selected functional and physical signs selected by analysts and a group of experts from the modified "Delphi" prediction method. This study resulted in the creation of a questionnaire (DFL questionnaire) with 16 symptoms: 7 functional and 9 physical.

The aim of this new study is to select the symptoms that have the best positive predictive value among the 16 symptoms, to predict a good result of rhizolysis, on the criterion of their mitigation or disappearance in case of effective rhizolysis.

Read the detailed description

The frequency of chronic lower back pain is a major economic and social problem. Indeed, there are numerous solutions that can be offered to patients, but sometimes they are unsatisfactory as medical treatments are often insufficiently effective, surgical techniques are often invasive and indications can be limited.

Rhizolysis or lumbar thermocoagulation is a therapeutic proposal for certain types of chronic lower back pain that is resistant to medical treatment and outside the field of surgical indications. This technique, which is minimally invasive, is low-risk for patients and is widely used. However, few studies have shown its effectiveness, so the level of evidence is not enough to make this technique accepted as a standard.

A previous study has selected functional and physical signs for joint involvement in lower back pain. This selection was made by analysts and a group of experts from the modified "Delphi" prediction method. This study resulted in the creation of a questionnaire (DFL questionnaire) with 16 symptoms: 7 functional and 9 physical.

The aim of this new study is to select the symptoms that have the best positive predictive value among the 16 symptoms, to predict a good result of rhizolysis, on the criterion of their mitigation or disappearance in case of effective rhizolysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rhizolysis
  • Diagnosis of Facet Joint Origin Lumbago

Keywords

  • DLF Questionnaire
  • rhizolysis
03

In context

Disease

1,327 studies on the registry are indexed under Disease; 596 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 80 across 732 interventional studies indexed under Disease.

Browse Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Ramsay Générale de Santé is the lead sponsor of 42 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient suffering from chronic lower back pain developing for more than 6 months and resistant to the medical treatments.
  • Patients with an indication of lumbar rhizolysis for their chronic lower back pain with a facet component, the starting point of which corresponds to the L4L5 and/or L5S1 stages.
  • Patient not objecting to their participation in the study.
  • Subject registered with a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adults under judicial protection
  • Adult under guardianship or trusteeship
  • Pregnant women
  • Minors
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Interventions

  • OtherRhizolysis pain analysis

    Definition of the subgroup of good clinical outcome after rhizolysis (called "effective" rhizolysis) by lumbar VAS or lower extremity pain VAS or Oswestry index decreased at 6 weeks after rhizolysis. The "efficiency" criterion based on the decrease in the dolorimeter or the Oswestry index corresponds to a decrease of at least 50% \[1, 2, 3, 4\].

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Predictive DFL symptoms

    • Comparison of the "effective rhizolysis" and "non-effective rhizolysis" subgroups at 6 weeks postoperatively to select the symptoms with the highest positive predictive value among the 16 symptoms of the DFL questionnaire based on the criterion of effectiveness of a decrease of 50% of VAS or Oswestry

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Clairval Private Hospital
    Marseille, Paca 13009, France
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 8, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04118218
Lead sponsor
Ramsay Générale de Santé
Collaborators
Dr BARAT
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 8, 2019
Start date
Dec 12, 2017
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 8, 2019

Study contacts

Jean Francois OUDET
Contact
jeanfrancois.oudet@free.fr
+33683346567
Marie Barba
Contact
mh.barba@ecten.eu
+330664888704 ext. +330664888704

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion