CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04115436GSAFUpdated Oct 17, 2019

Association of Genetic Variants With Risk of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Off-anticoagulation

An observational study in Thromboembolic Events, sponsored by Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-17.

Sponsored by Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Life-long therapy with oral anticoagulants (OAC) is strongly recommended in AF patients receiving left atrial appendage isolation (LAAI) to prevent thromboembolic (TE) events. However, some patients are observed to remain stroke-free while off OACs for years whereas others experience TE events if OAC is discontinued even for a short period of time. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the association of genetic variants (single nucleotide polymorphisms - SNPs) with off-anticoagulation stroke-risk in AF patients.

Read the detailed description
  1. BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) is known to be a leading cause of thrombo-embolic (TE) events (1).The left atrial appendage (LAA), an embryological remnant of the primitive left atrium, has been reported to be the source of thrombus formation in more than 90% of patients with non-valvular AF (2). More specifically, the loss of contractile function in the LAA following electrical isolation of the appendage (LAAI) leads to stasis and thrombus formation, which may then embolize into the systemic circulation. For this reason, life-long oral anticoagulation (OAC) is strongly recommended in post-LAAI cases to reduce the stroke-risk. However, intolerance to OAC, non-compliance, increase in the risk of bleeding in patients with bleeding disorders or in elderly with high fall-risk and difficulty in maintaining the therapeutic level for certain novel oral anticoagulants in patients with renal dysfunction are several limitations of the OAC therapy (3). Furthermore, patients occasionally need to discontinue OACs as advised by their treating physicians while undergoing other medical procedures. Patient-preference and non-compliance are other important reasons for OAC discontinuation.

    Whatever may be the cause, the consequence in terms of TE events, is observed to be highly variable. Some patients experience a TE event after withdrawal of OAC for a very short period while others remain stroke-free even after years while off OAC therapy. This intriguing observation triggers a vital question; does genetics play a role in increasing predisposition to stroke or providing protection from TE events? The current pilot study aims to address that question as understanding the underlying molecular mechanism would be highly useful in risk-prediction, counselling and optimal management of post-LAAI patients.

    Prior studies have reported an association between several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with stroke in patients with or without AF (4-19). Most were documented to be linked with elevated stroke-risk whereas few were found to have a protective impact. However, SNPs associated with stroke in the post-LAAI cases have not been elucidated yet. More importantly, it is not known why discontinuation of OAC has a differential impact on this high-risk population. Therefore, in this pilot study, we aim to test a number of SNPS (a list is provided at the end of the protocol) in post-LAAI cases to determine their association with stroke after discontinuation of OAC.

    1.1 Safety This study poses minimal risk to the subject. More specifically, the risks are those that are associated with venipuncture (pain, bleeding, bruising, infection, and inflammation at the site), during the single blood specimen collection.

  2. STUDY RATIONALE We hypothesize that there will be significant differences in the allele frequencies of SNPs among patients with and without TE events.
  3. STUDY OBJECTIVES 3.1 Primary Objective To compare the SNP profile of post-LAAI patients that have or have not experienced any TE events after discontinuation of OAC.
  4. STUDY DESIGN 4.1 Study Overview This is a single center, observational clinical trial. Subjects who meet all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be screened and consecutive consenting patients will be enrolled in the study. We will screen all patients that have stopped OAC after LAAI and enroll the consenting patients that have or have not experienced stroke during discontinuation of OAC.

The total duration of subject participation will be 1 day. The total duration of the study is expected to be 1 year.

02

Conditions studied

  • Thromboembolic Events

Keywords

  • LAA isolation, stroke, anticoagulation
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 924 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 300 across 1,363 observational studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

AF patients following LAA isolation

Inclusion criteria

  • i. male or female over 18 years of age at the time of enrollment ii. have received LAAI procedure iii. Discontinued OAC for any duration

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • i. end-stage renal or liver disease ii. on oral anticoagulation for any other condition iii. pregnant, breastfeeding, or unwilling to provide consent iv. presence of other conditions or abnormalities that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the quality of the data
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • stroke (+)

    Patients experiencing thromboembolic events following a brief discontinuation of anticoagulant or having thrombus on the LAA occlusion device

  • No-stroke

    Patients remaining stroke-free months after discontinuation of anticoagulants

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of difference in the SNP profile between the Stroke (+) and no-stroke patients

    Proportion of difference in the SNP profile between the Stroke (+) and no-stroke patients

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 17, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04115436
Lead sponsor
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 4, 2019
Start date
Oct 1, 2019
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 17, 2019

Study contacts

Sanghamitra Mohanty, MD
Contact
mitra1989@gmail.com
5125448198
Angel Mayedo, MD
Contact
angel.mayedo@stdavids.com

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion