ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04110821LOLIPOPUpdated Jul 30, 2024

Quality of Life After Conservative and Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

An observational study in Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Quality of Life and Incontinence, sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. Recruiting at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-30.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2019; still recruiting 7 years 1 month later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
134
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an observational study that gives baseline and follow-up information, that does not directly influence the allocation of patients to various treatment Options (conservative and surgical therapy of Pelvic Organ Prolapse) but the knowledge gained of the data will help to develop treatment strategies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse
  • Quality of Life
  • Incontinence

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

521 studies on the registry are indexed under Pelvic Organ Prolapse; 80 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 134 is close to the median of 134 across 171 observational studies indexed under Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Browse Pelvic Organ Prolapse studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland is the lead sponsor of 990 studies on the registry; 189 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

In this study all patients with POP being treated at the study site are subject to inclusion. This concerns patients with different symptoms of POP such as urine or fecal incontinence, chronic obstipation, dysfunction of the bowel evacuation, micturition disorder, chronic pelvic pain, complaints associated to pelvic floor descent and pelvic organ prolapse. They also may have combinations of these symptoms.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • \< 18 years
  • Patients unable to understand an
  • Patients unwilling to participate
  • emergency operations
  • pregnancy
  • Overactive Bladder without descensus
  • Stool incontinence without POP
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
134 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
5 Years
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. symptom change assessed by German Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (GPFQ)

    Change in the symptom scores assessed by the German Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (GPFQ) by at least 1.0 points 6 months post-therapy. The GPFQ does contain the domains bladder function, bowel function, prolapse and sexual symptoms. In each domain a total of 10 points may be reached. The maximum symptom score for the entire questionnaire are 40 points. The minimal symptom score is 0 points. The minimal important difference (MID) for patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) is 1.0 points. A decrease of the symptom score by at least 1 point reflects a meaningful improvement.

    Time frame: before therapy and up to 5 years post-therapy

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University Hospital Basel/Dep. of Visceral Surgery (Clarunis)
    Basel, Switzerland
    Recruiting
    • Daniel Steinemann, PD Dr. MD · Contactdaniel.steinemann@clarunis.ch · +41 61 777 75 27
    • Daniel Steinemann, PD Dr. MD · Principal investigator
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2028, 108 months after the start.

Of 55 non-industry observational studies under Pelvic Organ Prolapse, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 51. This study's planned 108 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 61 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 63.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 27, 2019
First posted
Oct 1, 2019
StartActual
Sep 15, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 2028
Last update
Jul 30, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04110821
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 1, 2019
Start date
Sep 15, 2019
Primary completion
Sep 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 30, 2024

Study contacts

Daniel C Steinemann, PD Dr. med.
Contact
daniel.steinemann@clarunis.ch
+41 61 777 75 27
Sebastian Christen
Contact
sebastian.christen@clarunis.ch
+41 61 777 75 53
Daniel Steinemann, PD Dr. med.
principal investigator · University Hospital Basel, Clarunis

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion