ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04091399Updated Sep 16, 2019

First-in-man Study of Adult Patients Suffered From Alveolar Osteitis Treated Using Stomatological Tamponade Contipro

A Phase 2 interventional study of Stamatological tamponade Contipro in Alveolar Osteitis, sponsored by Contipro Pharma a.s.. Completed at 11 sites in Czechia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-16.

Sponsored by Contipro Pharma a.s. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2015, registered Sep 2019).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
58
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Alveolar Osteitis (AO) is a complication following extraction of a tooth. AO manifests by localized pain in and around the extraction site where the postoperative blood clot has been disintegrated. The aim of this study was to determinate if there are any concerns of use of a pharmacological drug composed of an octenidine and lyophilized hyaluronic acid in a treatment of AO.

The tested drug is a sponge-like material composed solely of fully absorbable medicaments. It was designed to serve as non-toxic, slow-dissolving antiseptic which adheres to mucosa and so obturate the wound. The treatment was considered effective when the pain subsided to \< 20mm VAS in \< 8 days of treatment.

Read the detailed description

Alveolar Osteitis (AO) is a complication following extraction of a tooth. AO manifests by localized pain in and around the extraction site where the postoperative blood clot has been disintegrated. The AO incidence is reportedly conditioned by multiple risk factors including trauma/difficult extraction, smoking, acute inflammation of periodontal tissues (e.g. dentitio difficilis) prior to extraction. The use of oral contraceptives results in about 10 times higher incidence of AO. Furthermore, secondary contributing risk factors include age, flap design, local anesthetic containing vasoconstrictor, and bone/root debris left in the extraction wound. The drug tested in this study was composed from the Hyaluronic acid (HA) and Octenidine dihydrochloride (ODC). It was designed to perform comparatively in pain alleviation and to promote healing while avoiding the side effects.

The aim of this clinical study was to determinate if there are any concerns of use a pharmacological drug composed of ODC and HA in treatment of AO. The drug was designed to fulfill the following criteria: to disinfect the wound (provided by ODC), attach to the mucosa (HA), obturate the wound (HA), be stable in the presence of saliva (HA), be fully absorbable (ODC, HA), enhance healing process (HA), be non-allergic and have analgesic effect (ODC, HA).

The sponge-like pharmacological drug is a lyophilized water solution of ODC, HA, stabilized with calcium chloride; as such it is fully dissoluble, has antiseptic properties and is malleable. The drug was manufactured by Contipro Pharma a.s. (Czech Republic). The study was designed as a multi-center, open-label, first-in-men study and was approved by the ethical committee of the University Hospital Hradec Králové.

Upon the study initiation, the study subjects' extraction wounds were examined and described by the medical professional and the subjects' perceived-pain self-evaluation base data was recorded. The perceived pain was recorded on 0-100 mm VAS. Afterwards, the treatment was introduced. Firstly, the wound had been irrigated with 2 ml of 3% solution of H2O2 to disinfect the site and then flushed by 2 ml of Aqua pro injectione to clear any remaining debris. After, the tested drug was applied into the extraction wound. This procedure was repeated on a daily basis for a maximum of 7 days or until the pain subsided below 20 mm and remained there for at least 2 days.

The treatment was considered effective when the pain subsided to \< 20mm VAS in \< 8 days of treatment. Descriptive statistics were provided for each of the criteria using the following values: 1) for continuous data: mean, standard deviation (SD), median, lower/upper quartile, minimum and maximum values, 2) for qualitative data: absolute count and percentages. Hypotheses are tested at standard cutoff α = 0.05.

A descriptive analysis approach (including frequency tables) was used to assess clinical management, clinical outcomes and healthcare resources used. When appropriate two-sided 95% confidence interval was obtained for population characteristics of a variable. All calculations and summaries were produced using R version 3.2.3 (R Core Team, Austria).

02

Conditions studied

  • Alveolar Osteitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • first-man-study
  • alveolitis sicca dolorosa
  • alveolar osteitis
  • alveolalgia
  • sodium hyaluronate
  • octenidine hydrochlorid
  • clinical study
03

In context

Dry Socket

46 studies on the registry are indexed under Dry Socket; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 58 is close to the median of 60 across 41 interventional studies indexed under Dry Socket.

Browse Dry Socket studies →

Lead sponsor

Contipro Pharma a.s. is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient with diagnosed alveolar osteitis
  • Minimal age limit 18 years
  • Patient capable to fully understand and comply with the requirements of the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient younger than 18 years
  • Pregnant or lactant woman
  • Patient diagnosed with cancer
  • Patient with a history of radiotherapy in the head and neck area
  • Patient undergone bisphosphonate treatment within the last two years
  • Patient who had been given antibiotics less than two weeks prior the AO onset
  • Patient with or allergy to any substances contained in the tested drug
  • Patient who smokes more than 10 cigarettes per day
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
58 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patient cohort

    Patients suffered from alveolar osteitis and treated using a Stomatological tamponade Contipro, composed of the Hyaluronic acid and Octenidine dihydrochloride. Firstly, the extraction wound had been irrigated with 2 ml of 3% solution of H2O2 to disinfect the site and then flushed by 2 ml of Aqua pro injectione to clear any remaining debris. After, the tested drug was applied into the extraction wound. This procedure was repeated on a daily basis for a maximum of 7 days or until the pain subsided below 20 mm and remained there for at least 2 days.

    Drug: Stamatological tamponade Contipro

Interventions

  • DrugStamatological tamponade Contipro

    The drug is composed from the Hyaluronic acid and Octenidine dihydrochloride. It is designed to perform comparatively in pain alleviation and to promote healing of the alveolar osteitis while avoiding the side effects.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The number of patients with treated related adverse effects objectively evaluated by examiners

    The prevalence of potential treatment-relatived adverse effect evaluated by dentists in follow-up examinations

    Time frame: 7 days/per patient

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain change assessed by the VAS scale according to subjective evaluation by patients

    Pain change was assessed by the VAS scale. Pain relief associated with treatment was determinated as drop on the VAS scale below 20 mm

    Time frame: 7 days/per patient

Other outcomes

  1. Extraction wound healing assessed by objectively evaluation of examiners

    Examinars evaluated the extraction wound healing as a change of inflammation of the impacted alveolae on scale 0 - 5 (0 - no inflammation, 5 - persistant inflammation).

    Time frame: 7 days/per patient

07

Study locations

11 sites
  • IchtysDent s.r.o
    Brno, 60200, Czechia
  • University Hospital Brno, Clinic of Oral, Maxillary and Facial Surgery
    Brno, 62500, Czechia
  • Prouzovi s.r.o.
    Dvůr Králové Nad Labem, 54401, Czechia
  • University Hospital Hradec Králové, Department of Dentistry
    Hradec Králové, 50005, Czechia
  • Dentine s.r.o.
    Jičín, 50601, Czechia
  • FSmile s.r.o.
    Opočno, 51773, Czechia
  • Dentpra
    Pardubice, 53002, Czechia
  • Mojmír Strnad
    Pardubice, 53002, Czechia
  • MEDIKAP
    Pardubice, 53009, Czechia
  • DV Dent s.r.o.
    Roudnice Nad Labem, 41301, Czechia
  • Enta Dent s.r.o
    Ústí Nad Labem, 400 01, Czechia
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04091399
Lead sponsor
Contipro Pharma a.s.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 16, 2019
Start date
Sep 11, 2015
Primary completion
Feb 12, 2016
Completion
Feb 12, 2016
Last update
Sep 16, 2019

Study contacts

Jakub Suchánek, MUDr.
principal investigator · University Hospital Hradec Králové

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion