CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04087122Updated May 12, 2022Results posted

Evaluate the Efficiency Impact of Conducting Active Temperature Management During Cardiac Cryoablation Procedures

An interventional study of Esophageal warming device (Attune Medical, Chicago, IL in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Advanced Cooling Therapy, Inc., d/b/a Attune Medical. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-12.

Sponsored by Advanced Cooling Therapy, Inc., d/b/a Attune Medical · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Left atrial catheter ablation including pulmonary vein isolation is a standard therapy in the management of symptomatic atrial fibrillation; however thermal esophageal injury is a known potential consequence of this procedure. Delivery of radiofrequency (RF) energy necessary to perform left atrial ablation has the potential to cause injury to the nearby esophagus including ulceration, hematoma, spasm, esophageal motility disorders, and, in the most extreme case, atrial-esophageal fistula.Esophageal mucosal lesions are the likely precursor to AEF, and esophageal mucosal lesions have been detected on post-ablation endoscopy after pulmonary vein isolation with an incidence ranging from 3% to 60%.

Active esophageal cooling during RF ablation as a means of esophageal injury prevention has been investigated through mathematical models, pre-clinical studies, and in clinical trials. Existing data support the efficacy of this approach, but the practice has not been widely adopted due to lack of a commercially available device.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact on procedural efficiency of ablation procedures performed using esophageal heat transfer to warm the esophagus during left atrial cryoablation.

Read the detailed description

This study is a prospective, pilot study using the Attune Medical ensoETM esophageal heat transfer device to actively warm the esophagus during cryoablation procedures. This design is appropriate to gather the data needed regarding overall procedural time, compare this to historical controls, and estimate a sample size for a larger study powered for statistical significance.

Once patient consent is obtained, the subject will undergo preparation and anesthesia procedures following standard practice. Once the patient is intubated, the esophageal heat transfer device will be placed into the esophagus according to the IFU. The device will remain in place until the ablation procedure is completed and will be removed before extubation. Left atrial cryoablation using the standard approach will be performed with the ensoETM set at a temperature of 42 degrees C.

All patients will be followed up in total for 6 weeks (Long Term FU visit) after the procedure to document any clinical complication related to thermal esophageal injuries if applicable.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation

Browse trials for

03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 924 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 144 across 2,380 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Advanced Cooling Therapy, Inc., d/b/a Attune Medical is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (age over 18 years).
  • Undergoing cryoablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation, including pulmonary vein isolation.
  • Patients must be able to understand and critically review the informed consent form.
  • Subjects must understand and agree to study requirements and sign a written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are unable to provide informed consent.
  • Significant co-morbidities that preclude standard ablation procedure.
  • Patients with \<40 kg of body mass.
  • Patients with relevant esophageal pathology (e.g. esophageal cancer).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Esophageal warming

    Patients receive the Attune Medical Esophageal Heat Transfer Device

    Device: Esophageal warming device (Attune Medical, Chicago, IL

Interventions

  • DeviceEsophageal warming device (Attune Medical, Chicago, IL

    Prospective, single center pilot stud

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Time of Active Ablation Procedure

    Total time of active ablation procedure measured from trans-septal puncture to achievement of Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI)

    Time frame: Study Day 1 for all patients enrolled, during left atrial ablation procedures using cryoablation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total Procedure Time

    Total procedure time from patient entry to Electrophysiology (EP) lab until discharge to Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)

    Time frame: Study Day 1 for all patients enrolled from patient entry to Electrophysiology (EP) lab until post procedure discharge to Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)]

  2. Number of Procedural Pauses During Left Atrial Instrumentation

    Number of procedural pauses during left atrial instrumentation measured from trans-septal puncture to achievement of Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI)

    Time frame: Study Day 1 for all patients, during left atrial ablation procedures using cryoablation

  3. Total Duration of Fluoroscopy Use

    Total duration of fluoroscopy use during left atrial instrumentation measured from trans-septal puncture to achievement of Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI)

    Time frame: Study Day 1 for all patients, during left atrial ablation procedures using cryoablation

07

Results

Posted Sep 5, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEsophageal Warming
Started20
Completed20
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryTotal Time of Active Ablation Procedure

Total time of active ablation procedure measured from trans-septal puncture to achievement of Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI)

Time frame:
Study Day 1 for all patients enrolled, during left atrial ablation procedures using cryoablation
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Total Time of Active Ablation Procedure
minutesEsophageal Warming
Total Time of Active Ablation Procedure126 (112 to 139)
SecondaryTotal Procedure Time

Total procedure time from patient entry to Electrophysiology (EP) lab until discharge to Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)

Time frame:
Study Day 1 for all patients enrolled from patient entry to Electrophysiology (EP) lab until post procedure discharge to Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)]
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Total Procedure Time
minutesEsophageal Warming
Total Procedure Time126 (112 to 139)
SecondaryNumber of Procedural Pauses During Left Atrial Instrumentation

Number of procedural pauses during left atrial instrumentation measured from trans-septal puncture to achievement of Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI)

Time frame:
Study Day 1 for all patients, during left atrial ablation procedures using cryoablation
Reported as:
Mean · Procedural pauses
Number of Procedural Pauses During Left Atrial Instrumentation
Procedural pausesEsophageal Warming
Number of Procedural Pauses During Left Atrial Instrumentation0 (0 to 16.8)
SecondaryTotal Duration of Fluoroscopy Use

Total duration of fluoroscopy use during left atrial instrumentation measured from trans-septal puncture to achievement of Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI)

Time frame:
Study Day 1 for all patients, during left atrial ablation procedures using cryoablation
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Total Duration of Fluoroscopy Use
minutesEsophageal Warming
Total Duration of Fluoroscopy Use23.4 ± 7.8

Adverse events

Collected over 145 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Esophageal Warming0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Esophageal Warming
Mean68.5 ± 8.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Esophageal Warming
Female11
Male9
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Esophageal Warming
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Winchester Medical Center
    Winchester, Virginia 22601, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 12, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 12, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04087122
Lead sponsor
Advanced Cooling Therapy, Inc., d/b/a Attune Medical
Collaborators
Winchester Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 12, 2019
Start date
Sep 30, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2020
Completion
Dec 31, 2020
Results posted
Sep 5, 2021
Last update
May 12, 2022

Study contacts

Daniel Alexander, MD
principal investigator · Winchester Medical Center
Zachary Hollis, MD
principal investigator · Winchester Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion