An observational study in Psychiatric Disorder, sponsored by Queen Margaret University. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-09.
Sponsored by Queen Margaret University · Observational
The purpose of this cohort study, using an existing database, is to seek to describe the relationship between psychosocial factors (independent variables) and employment outcomes (dependent variables) in a population of people with complex mental health problems receiving evidence-based supported employment (EBSE) augmented with theory-driven occupational therapy interventions. The intention is to understand the predictive nature of psychosocial factors on the positive outcome of success in achieving paid employment.
The Worker role interview (WRI) is routinely used in the research site; an National health Service (NHS) occupational therapy led vocational rehabilitation delivering EBSE service for people with complex mental health problems. An existing database of initial assessments and employment outcomes is available for investigation.
The cohort study will be undertaken utilising a secondary dataset from an established vocational rehabilitation service (VRS). This service is experienced in providing intervention based on individual placement and support (IPS) with established high fidelity to the model. The team's interventions are also guided by the model of human occupation, (MOHO) and the Worker Role Interview is routinely completed with all patients accessing the service. The Worker Role Interview is a valid reliable measure of psychosocial items measuring of readiness for employment.
The consistency of intervention will be ensured as the service is routinely appraised for fidelity to the IPS by two experts, using a standardised assessment tool the IPS fidelity scale and the team has received ongoing training and regular caseload supervision to integrate evidence-based occupational therapy into practice. The experts appraising the service are independent of both the clinical service and the proposed research.
The established VRS provides an assessment and intervention for people with complex mental health problems. A dataset has been routinely collected over several years which is currently used to evaluate the service.
To address potential limitations of secondary data analysis the researcher has an established relationship with clinicians in the VRS and was involved in the selection of routine measures now used to evaluate the service. It is, therefore, possible to be confident that a consistent and standard dataset is available for analysis. Ongoing training and consultation have been provided by the researcher to the clinical service to ensure the data quality.
Data Collection The data will be managed and transferred by a trained researcher on site at both services.Data will be robustly anonymised prior to transfer. Data will be transferred from NHS secure network to secure network within Queen Margaret University using a secure email service approved by the Department of Health.
The dataset comprises; Research identification (ID) code Gender Age on Admission Ethnicity Marital Status Living situation (alone/shared/supported accommodation) Quintile range of Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation Educational attainment Previous employment ICD10 Worker role interview items Date of assessment WRI Assesses Abilities \& Limitations WRI Expectation of Success in Work WRI Takes Responsibility WRI Commitment to Work WRI Work-Related Goals WRI Enjoys Work WRI Pursues Interests WRI Appraises Work Expectations WRI Influence of Other Roles WRI Work Habits WRI Daily Routines WRI Adapts Routine to Minimize Difficulties WRI Perception of Physical Work Setting WRI Perception of Family and Peers WRI Perception of Boss and/or Company WRI Perception of Co-workers Employment goal Date of final goal review Outcome of goal (successful/ unsuccessful in attaining employment)
Sample; Based on the guideline of a minimum of 10 events per predictor variable, a sample size of 200 would allow for the robust estimation of 8 variables in the model.
Analysis Plan The collected data will be subject to analysis with the use of multiple logistic regression using the R data analysis software. Multiple logistic regression will allow the construction of models which examine the effects of psychosocial predictors on the probability of a person with complex mental health problems attaining paid employment. Possible confounds which may influence outcomes will be controlled for (e.g. age, gender, educational achievement, history of employment). Interpretation of the analysis will be shared and discussed with clinicians who are expert in their field to ensure that findings are considered from both a statistical significance and clinical significance position.
2,107 studies on the registry are indexed under Mental Disorders; 416 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 202 is close to the median of 200 across 480 observational studies indexed under Mental Disorders.
Browse Mental Disorders studies →Queen Margaret University is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Complex mental health problems; unemployed
Exclusion Criteria:
Attainment of Employment or Education
successful attainment of open employment or educational opportunity / unsuccessful
Time frame: 1day
Time to Attainment of Employment or Education
Time to outcome for those successfully attaining employment or education
Time frame: 1day-69months
| Milestone | Enhanced Individual Placement and Support (IPS) Programme |
|---|---|
| Started | 202 |
| Completed | 202 |
| Not completed | 0 |
successful attainment of open employment or educational opportunity / unsuccessful
| Participants | Enhanced IPS Programme |
|---|---|
| Attained employment or education | 128 |
| Did not attain employment or education | 74 |
Time to outcome for those successfully attaining employment or education
| months | Enhanced IPS Programme |
|---|---|
| Time to Attainment of Employment or Education | 8.435 (5.055 to 16.742) |
Collected over 1day to 69mths. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enhanced IPS Programme | 0/202 (0%) | 0/202 (0%) | 0/202 (0%) |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Enhanced IPS Programme |
|---|---|
| Mean | 37.4 ± 10.8 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Enhanced IPS Programme |
|---|---|
| Female | 78 |
| Male | 124 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants) | Enhanced IPS Programme |
|---|---|
| Ethnicity — White | 185 |
| Ethnicity — Other ethnic group | 17 |
| Marital Status(Participants) | Enhanced IPS Programme |
|---|---|
| Married / de facto relationship | 33 |
| Single | 163 |
| missing data | 6 |
| Social Situation(Participants) | Enhanced IPS Programme |
|---|---|
| living with others | 97 |
| living alone | 101 |
| missing data | 4 |
| Scottish Indices of Multiple Deprivation(Participants) | Enhanced IPS Programme |
|---|---|
| most deprived quintile 1 | 38 |
| quintile 2 | 35 |
| quintile 3 | 33 |
| quintile 4 | 32 |
| least deprived quintile 5 | 64 |
| Educational Attainment(Participants) | Enhanced IPS Programme |
|---|---|
| Did Not Attain School Quals | 18 |
| Exams from School | 61 |
| Further Education | 121 |
| missing data | 2 |
| Previous Employment(Participants) | Enhanced IPS Programme |
|---|---|
| Previous employment | 182 |
| No previous employment | 20 |
17 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.
No study locations are listed for this record.
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No — all IPD that underlie results in a publication
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Queen Margaret University