ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04078984PMVSUpdated Jun 7, 2021

Driving Pressure as a Predictor of Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Time on Post-ARDS Patients in Pressure Support Ventilation.

An observational study in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-07.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
45
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

With the birth of Mechanical Ventilation in the 1950s came the ventilation induced lung injuries (VILI). Numerous works have since then shown the benefit of "protective ventilation", notably by controlling the delivered tidal volume and pressures. However, as the respiratory condition improves and the weaning is started by shifting to Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV), these parameters stop being tightly controlled. This study aims to determine whether there is a relationship between the driving pressure measured in PSV and the weaning time.

Read the detailed description

Scientific justification :

As mechanical ventilation developed since the 1950s, researchers started to recognize characteristic lung disease associated with it, Nash et al giving an anatomopathological description of "Respiratory Lung" on post-mortem examination of lungs after mechanical ventilation in 1967 [2]. It progressively led to the concept of VILI and of the protective ventilation to minimize it, enhancing lower tidal volume and plateau pressure [3], controlled Driving Pressure \< 15cmH2O[4], neuromuscular blockade[5] and prone positioning[6]. However, these parameters can only be controlled for sedated patients in Controlled Ventilation. As the respiratory conditions improve, the onset of spontaneous breathing uses PSV [7] but because pressure support is added to the inspiratory effort of the patient, tidal volume and driving pressure stop being tightly controlled. It is therefore possible for the driving pressure to be higher than 15 cmH2O in case of a major inspiratory effort. One ought to wonder whether a high driving pressure is associated with a prolonged weaning phase following a moderate to severe ARDS.

Strategy description:

Patients that enter the weaning phase following a moderate to severe ARDS equipped with a nasogastric allowing measures of EAdi will be included. Driving Pressure will be measured following the method used by Bellani et al [1]. A weaning test will be conducted daily.

Follow up description:

  • Daily measures of End Inspiratory Pressure with respiratory synchronisation optimised by use of EAdi
  • Daily spontaneous breathing trial using low levels of pressure support
  • Pplat, Respiratory System Compliance, Driving Pressure, PEEP, Tidal Volume will be monitored daily as well as clinical and other routine ventilatory data. Data concerning initial severity of ARDS, and duration of ARDS, controlled mechanical ventilation, sedation and neuromuscular blockade and date of first spontaneous breathing trial will be collected. A weaning test will be conducted daily.
02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Keywords

  • Pressure Support Ventilation
  • Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Time
  • Driving Pressure
  • Respiratory Weaning
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • Ventilation Induced Lung Injury
03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1,619 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is below the median of 100 across 548 observational studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux is the lead sponsor of 803 studies on the registry; 194 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients hospitalized in the thoracic resuscitation department of the Haut-Lévêque Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, who will be consecutive patients undergoing respiratory weaning following a moderate-to-severe ARDS according to the Berlin criteria, and not presenting the exclusion criteria mentioned above will be proposed the protocol.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient over 18 years old
  • Patients hospitalized in the ICU and who have suffered moderate to severe ARDS (Berlin criteria) equiped with nasogastric feeding tube allowing measures of Eadi

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • COPD or measured or suspected auto-PEEP higher than 3 cmH2O at beginning of Pressure Support
  • Admission in the ICU more than 15 days before the initiation of weaning
  • Broncho-pleural leaks
  • ECMO
  • Pregnant woman.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Experimental

    Experimental group is composed by patients that enter the weaning phase following a moderate to severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) equiped with a nasogastric allowing measures of Electrical Activity of diaphragm (EAdi) will be included. Driving Pressure will be measured following the method used by Bellani et al. A weaning test will be conducted daily.

    Other: Experimental

Interventions

  • OtherExperimental

    * Daily measures of End Inspiratory Pressure with respiratory synchronisation optimised by use of EAdi * Daily spontaneous breathing trial using low levels of pressure support * Pplat, Respiratory System Compliance, Driving Pressure, PEEP, Tidal Volume will be monitored daily as well as clinical and other routine ventilatory data. Data concerning initial severity of ARDS, and duration of ARDS, controlled mechanical ventilation, sedation and neuromuscular blockade and date of first spontaneous breathing trial will be collected. A weaning test will be conducted daily.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ventilation free days

    Ventilation free days is defined by the first transition from mechanical controlled ventilation to pressure support ventilation following a moderate to severe ARDS.

    Time frame: at day 28 following the inclusion visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Extubated patients

    Number of extubated patients at day 7 after inclusion

    Time frame: at day 7 after inclusion visit

  2. Successful weaning test

    Time to first successful weaning test

    Time frame: from inclusion day to successful weaning test, up to 28 days

  3. Compliance of the Respiratory System (CRS)

    Evolution of CRS value during the first 7 days of weaning.The evolution is considered favorable, when the increase is more than 15% during the first 7 days of weaning.

    Time frame: from inclusion day to day 7

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hôpital Haut-Lévêque
    Pessac, 33604, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2019 to primary completion in Mar 2021, 17 months.

Of 261 non-industry observational studies under Respiratory Distress Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 49. This study's 17 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 270 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 30, 2019
First posted
Sep 6, 2019
StartActual
Sep 27, 2019
Primary completionActual
Mar 16, 2021
CompletionActual
Mar 16, 2021
Last update
Jun 7, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 7, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04078984
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 6, 2019
Start date
Sep 27, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 16, 2021
Completion
Mar 16, 2021
Last update
Jun 7, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion