ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT04071691PITAUpdated Jul 22, 2024

PET Imaging of Giant Cell and Takayasu Arteritis

An observational study in Giant Cell Arteritis and Takayasu Arteritis, sponsored by University of Cambridge. Active, not recruiting at 2 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-22.

Sponsored by University of Cambridge · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2025, 1 year 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
27
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

While 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is often included in the diagnostic work-up of patients with large-vessel vasculitis (LVV), 18F-FDG lacks specificity for inflammatory cells and has limited ability to track therapy response. Moreover, high background 18F-FDG uptake in the brain and myocardium largely precludes imaging temporal arteritis in giant-cell arteritis (GCA) and coronary artery involvement in Takayasu arteritis respectively. These limitations of 18F-FDG for imaging LVV highlight important unmet clinical needs, which might be overcome by using a somatostatin receptor subtype-2 (SST2) PET tracer.

Read the detailed description

Up-regulation of SST2 in activated macrophages represents a novel imaging target for measuring vascular inflammation, which has been previously examined in atherosclerosis using 68Ga-DOTATATE. To test the hypothesis that SST2 PET imaging can accurately identify LVV, patients with active GCA or Takayasu arteritis will undergo vascular 68Ga-DOTATATE or 18F-fluoroethyltriazole-(Tyr3)-octreotate (FETO) PET-MRI at baseline, with repeat imaging after 6 months of treatment. A group of individuals with LVV in clinical remission will also undergo SST2 PET imaging. Data from patients with clinically inactive disease will serve to confirm tracer specificity for active disease, as well as signal reproducibility. 18F-FETO is an alternative SST2 tracer to 68Ga-DOTATATE; the longer half-life and shorter positron range of 18F compared to 68Ga may offer several advantages, including wider tracer availability and improved spatial resolution when imaging small arteries. All patients will also undergo 18F-FDG imaging before treatment, where clinically indicated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Giant Cell Arteritis
  • Takayasu Arteritis
03

In context

Giant Cell Arteritis

147 studies on the registry are indexed under Giant Cell Arteritis; 49 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 27 is below the median of 128 across 78 observational studies indexed under Giant Cell Arteritis.

Browse Giant Cell Arteritis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Cambridge is the lead sponsor of 116 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with LVV

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female participants >18 years old
  • Able to give written, and to lie flat
  • Either:

    1. New clinical diagnosis or acute flare of LVV (Giant-cell arteritis or Takayasu's arteritis) within \~1 week of treatment initiation, and
    2. Clinical indication for 18F-FDG PET-CT scan determined by the referring physician, or
    3. Undergoing surgery for LVV, or
    4. Diagnosis of LVV in remission

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women of child bearing potential not using adequate
  • to MRI scanning
  • Contrast allergy or contrast-nephropathy
  • Chronic kidney disease ( \<30 mL/min/1.73 m2)
  • Any medical condition, in the opinion of the investigator, that prevents the participant from lying flat during scanning, or from participating in the study
  • History of recent deemed relevant to the study by the investigator
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
27 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Active LVV

    Patients with active LVV

    Diagnostic Test: PET-MRI

  • Stable LVV

    Patients with inactive LVV

    Diagnostic Test: PET-MRI

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPET-MRI

    SST2 PET-MRI scan

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of SST2 PET-MRI for LVV

    To determine the diagnostic accuracy of SST2 PET-MRI for LVV, with the clinically adjudicated diagnosis as the gold-standard.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Treatment response

    To compare vascular SST2 PET pre- and post-treatment for LVV

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Active versus inactive disease

    To compare vascular SST2 PET in patients with active disease versus inactive disease

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Comparison with biochemical markers of disease severity

    To compare SST2 PET to C-reactive protein (CRP)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  4. Comparison with clinical measures of disease severity

    To compare SST2 PET to clinical disease activity scores

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  5. Comparison of SST2 PET tracers

    To compare 68Ga-DOTATATE PET to 18F-FETO PET

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tarkin JM, Joshi FR, Evans NR, Chowdhury MM, Figg NL, Shah AV, Starks LT, Martin-Garrido A, Manavaki R, Yu E, Kuc RE, Grassi L, Kreuzhuber R, Kostadima MA, Frontini M, Kirkpatrick PJ, Coughlin PA, Gopalan D, Fryer TD, Buscombe JR, Groves AM, Ouwehand WH, Bennett MR, Warburton EA, Davenport AP, Rudd JH. Detection of Atherosclerotic Inflammation by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET Compared to [18F]FDG PET Imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Apr 11;69(14):1774-1791. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.060. PubMed 28385306 ↗
  • Pedersen SF, Sandholt BV, Keller SH, Hansen AE, Clemmensen AE, Sillesen H, Hojgaard L, Ripa RS, Kjaer A. 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/MRI for Detection of Activated Macrophages in Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques: Studies in Patients Undergoing Endarterectomy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015 Jul;35(7):1696-703. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.305067. Epub 2015 May 14. PubMed 25977567 ↗
  • Dubash SR, Keat N, Mapelli P, Twyman F, Carroll L, Kozlowski K, Al-Nahhas A, Saleem A, Huiban M, Janisch R, Frilling A, Sharma R, Aboagye EO. Clinical Translation of a Click-Labeled 18F-Octreotate Radioligand for Imaging Neuroendocrine Tumors. J Nucl Med. 2016 Aug;57(8):1207-13. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.169532. Epub 2016 May 12. PubMed 27173162 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2025, 70 months after the start.

Of 44 observational studies under Giant Cell Arteritis, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 33 and three quarters within 164. This study's planned 70 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 16, 2019
First posted
Aug 28, 2019
StartActual
Jun 25, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2025
CompletionEst.
Apr 2025
Last update
Jul 22, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04071691
Collaborators
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Wellcome Trust, Imperial College London, National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
Responsible party
Jason Tarkin (Wellcome Clinical Research Career Development Fellow, University of Cambridge) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 28, 2019
Start date
Jun 25, 2019
Primary completion
Apr 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 22, 2024

Study contacts

Jason M Tarkin, MBBS PhD
principal investigator · University of Cambridge

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion