CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04066179Updated Sep 9, 2019

Efficacy of Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy of Corticosteroids With GCSF in Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis Patients.

An interventional study of Gcsf and Prednisolone in Alcoholic Hepatitis, sponsored by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India. Status unknown at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-09.

Sponsored by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
126
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The patients of Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis (SAH) will be included in study based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients will be then randomized in 3 groups for therapy. They will receive either steroid or Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (GCSF) or both. They will be followed for atleast 90 days for improvements in symptoms and various predefined parameters. Primary outcome will be improvement in survival at 90 Days. Patients will be monitored at every follow up for disease progression and complications of therapy. The study results will be analyzed for differences in survival rate and complications in different groups to propose new therapeutic guideline in SAH patients.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Hepatitis A

2,709 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis A; 142 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 126 is above the median of 100 across 1,886 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis A.

Browse Hepatitis A studies →

Lead sponsor

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India is the lead sponsor of 296 studies on the registry; 84 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Severe alcoholic hepatitis patients [Maddrey's score > 32] aged between 18 to 65 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of active infections
  • Acute Gastrointestinal bleed
  • Hepatorenal syndrome
  • Patient unwilling
  • Discriminant Function >90
  • Autoimmune hepatitis
  • Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, Human immunodeficiency Virus cases
  • Pregnancy
  • Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)
  • Hb\<8 and baseline White Blood Cell>25000
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
126 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Prednisolone+G-CSF

    Prednisolone 40 mg/day for initial 7 days G-CSF300 microgram daily for 7 days

    Drug: Gcsf · Drug: Prednisolone

  • Active comparator
    Prednisolone

    Prednisolone 40 mg/day for 7 days

    Drug: Prednisolone

  • Experimental
    Granulocytes-Colony Stimulating Factor

    Granulocytes-Colony Stimulating Factor 300 mcg for 7 days followed by 300 mcg every 3 days

    Drug: Gcsf

Interventions

  • DrugGcsf

    Granulocytes-Colony Stimulating Factor 300 mcg for 7 days followed by 300 mcg every 3 days

  • DrugPrednisolone

    Prednisolone 40 mg for initial 7 days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. increase in Survival at 90 days in all the groups.

    Time frame: 90 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Improvement in CTP (Child-Pugh Score) in all the groups.

    CTP- Child-Turcotte-Pugh score ranges from 5 to 15, lowest is best and highest is worst.

    Time frame: Day 28

  2. Improvement in CTP (Child-Pugh Score) in all the groups.

    CTP- Child-Turcotte-Pugh score ranges from 5 to 15, lowest is best and highest is worst.

    Time frame: Day 180

  3. Improvement in MELD (Model for End Stage Liver Disease) in all the groups.

    A disease severity scoring system for adults with liver disease, designed to improve the organ allocation in transplantation based on the severity of liver disease rather than the length of time on the waiting list. A MELD score is a number that ranges from 6 to 40, based on lab tests.

    Time frame: Day 28

  4. Improvement in MELD (Model for End Stage Liver Disease) in all the groups.

    A disease severity scoring system for adults with liver disease, designed to improve the organ allocation in transplantation based on the severity of liver disease rather than the length of time on the waiting list. A MELD score is a number that ranges from 6 to 40, based on lab tests.

    Time frame: Day 180

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences
    New Delhi, Delhi 110070, India
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04066179
Lead sponsor
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 26, 2019
Start date
Sep 7, 2019 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 27, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 27, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 9, 2019

Study contacts

Dr Ajay Mishra, MD
Contact
ajaymishrapandit@gmail.com
01146300000

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion