ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04064112SCCIXTUpdated Dec 20, 2023

S-BLR Versus C-BLR for CI-IXT in Children

An interventional study of S-BLR and C-BLR in Convergence Insufficiency Intermittent Exotropia (CI-IXT), sponsored by Chen Zhao. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-20.

Sponsored by Chen Zhao · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multi-center, randomized single-blind controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of S-BLR with C-BLR for the treatment of CI-IXT in children.

Specific Aim 1 (Primary): To compare the surgical successful rate of S-BLR with C-BLR for the treatment of CI-IXT in children.

Specific Aim 2 (Secondary): To study the suboptimal surgical outcomes between S-BLR and C-BLR for the treatment of CI-IXT in children.

Read the detailed description

Using conventional surgical procedures, higher postoperative near undercorrection and/or distant overcorrection rates were observed in CI-IXT. To achieve better outcome, S-BLR was introduced. Previous studies showed its efficacy in reducing near exodeviation, distant exodeviation, and NDD. So far, only limited studies have directly evaluated the surgical outcomes between S-BLR and C-BLR. The pilot study done by Snir et al included 12 patients with S-BLR and 6 patients with C-BLR and the success rates of S-BLR vs C-BLR were 92% vs 0 at one-year follow-up. The retrospective study done by Song et al included 17 patients undergoing S-BLR and 14 patients undergoing C-BLR. With stricter successful criteria, the success rates of S-BLR vs C-BLR were 35% vs 7% at six-month follow-up. A large randomized trial is needed to compare the surgical successful rate and suboptimal surgical outcomes of S-BLR with C-BLR in children with CI-IXT.

The proposed trial will be conducted in 6 different study sites working in the field of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus.Each site will have one certified surgeon to do all surgeries. Under general anesthesia, the LR recession is performed using an inferior-temporal fornix incision. For S-BLR, the lower horn of the LR is recessed based on near exodeviation and the upper horn is recessed based on distant exodeviation. For C-BLR, the LR is recessed based on distant exodeviation. Surgical dose is according to the largest preoperative exodeviation at distance (6 meters) or near (1/3 meter) by the prism and alternate cover test(PACT). The extent of the recession is based on Parks' surgical dosage schedule.

02

Conditions studied

  • Convergence Insufficiency Intermittent Exotropia (CI-IXT)
03

In context

Exotropia

58 studies on the registry are indexed under Exotropia; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 200 is above the median of 50 across 49 interventional studies indexed under Exotropia.

Browse Exotropia studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Chen Zhao as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Exodeviation at least 15 at distance (6 meters);
  • Exodeviation at most 50 at near (1/3 meter);
  • Greater exodeviation at near than at distance by 10 or more;
  • Control score of exodeviation greater than 3;
  • Best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better in the worse eye, and interocular difference of less than 2 lines;
  • Myopia5.00D, hyperopia3.0D and anisometropia≤2.5D based on cycloplegic refraction
  • Optical correction needed for at least 2 weeks before evaluation of exodeviation: myopia0.5D or astigmatism1.5D in either eye, or anisometropia1.0D;
  • Written given by participants and their parents or legal guardians.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior strabismus surgery or botulinum toxin injection;
  • Coexisting vertical deviation greater than 5, oblique muscle dysfunction, torsional deviation, dissociated vertical deviation, A-V pattern, or other conditions requiring horizontal rectus transposition, oblique surgery or vertical rectus surgery;
  • Paralytic or restrictive strabismus;
  • Lateral incomitance (greater exodeviation in right or left gaze position than in primary position by 5 or more with appropriate optical correction);
  • Ocular disease other than strabismus or refractive error;
  • Previous intraocular or refractive surgery;
  • Craniofacial malformations affecting the orbit;
  • Significant neurological disorders;
  • Birth date34 weeks or birth weight1500 gram.

Abbreviations: CI-IXT, convergence insufficiency intermittent exotropia; D, diopter.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    S-BLR

    For S-BLR, the lower horn of the LR is recessed based on near exodeviation and the upper horn is recessed based on distant exodeviation.

    Procedure: S-BLR

  • Active comparator
    C-BLR

    For C-BLR, the LR is recessed based on distant exodeviation.

    Procedure: C-BLR

Interventions

  • ProcedureS-BLR

    Surgery of slanted bilateral LR recession for CI-IXT patients

  • ProcedureC-BLR

    Surgery of conventional bilateral lateral rectus recession for CI-IXT patients

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. surgical successful rate

    Surgical successful cases/total cases. The successful criterion is a postoperative residual deviation at near and distance between 10 PD of exophoria/tropia and 5 PD of esophoria/tropia with near-distance difference \<10 PD.

    Time frame: at 12 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. suboptimal surgical rate

    suboptimal surgical cases/total cases. Suboptimal surgical outcomes include: undercorrection, overcorrection, diplopia, torsional deviation, A-V pattern, abduction limitation and reoperation.

    Time frame: at 12 month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University
    Shanghai, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Burian HM. Exodeviations: their classification, diagnosis and treatment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966 Dec;62(6):1161-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(66)92570-0. No abstract available. PubMed 5957892 ↗
  • Raab EL, Parks MM. Recession of the lateral recti. Effect of Preoperative fusion and distance-near relationship. Arch Ophthalmol. 1975 Aug;93(8):584-6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1975.01010020568002. PubMed 1156220 ↗
  • Snir M, Axer-Siegel R, Shalev B, Sherf I, Yassur Y. Slanted lateral rectus recession for exotropia with convergence weakness. Ophthalmology. 1999 May;106(5):992-6. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00522-9. PubMed 10328402 ↗
  • Chun BY, Kang KM. Early results of slanted recession of the lateral rectus muscle for intermittent exotropia with convergence insufficiency. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:380467. doi: 10.1155/2015/380467. Epub 2015 Jan 26. PubMed 25688298 ↗
  • Farid MF, Abdelbaset EA. Surgical outcomes of three different surgical techniques for treatment of convergence insufficiency intermittent exotropia. Eye (Lond). 2018 Apr;32(4):693-700. doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.259. Epub 2017 Dec 22. PubMed 29271419 ↗
  • Chen X, Fu Z, Yu J, Ding H, Bai J, Chen J, Gong Y, Zhu H, Yu R, Liu H. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in Eastern China: results from screening of preschool children aged 36-72 months. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;100(4):515-9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306999. Epub 2015 Aug 10. PubMed 26261229 ↗
  • Yang HK, Hwang JM. Surgical outcomes in convergence insufficiency-type exotropia. Ophthalmology. 2011 Aug;118(8):1512-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Apr 7. PubMed 21474185 ↗
  • Wang B, Wang L, Wang Q, Ren M. Comparison of different surgery procedures for convergence insufficiency-type intermittent exotropia in children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Oct;98(10):1409-13. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304442. Epub 2014 May 19. PubMed 24842862 ↗
  • Ma L, Yang L, Li N. Bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession for the convergence insufficiency type of intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS. 2016 Jun;20(3):194-196.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2016.01.014. Epub 2016 May 6. PubMed 27164428 ↗
  • Choi DG, Rosenbaum AL. Medial rectus resection(s) with adjustable suture for intermittent exotropia of the convergence insufficiency type. J AAPOS. 2001 Feb;5(1):13-7. doi: 10.1067/mpa.2001.111137. PubMed 11182666 ↗
  • BURIAN HM, SPIVEY BE. THE SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF EXODEVIATIONS. Am J Ophthalmol. 1965 Apr;59:603-20. No abstract available. PubMed 14270998 ↗
  • Kraft SP, Levin AV, Enzenauer RW. Unilateral surgery for exotropia with convergence weakness. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1995 May-Jun;32(3):183-7. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19950501-12. PubMed 7636700 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — We concerns about patient privacy issues and it's better to protect the publication potential.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2019 to primary completion in Feb 2022, 28 months.

Of 29 interventional studies with no phase under Exotropia, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 46. This study's 28 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 4, 2019
First posted
Aug 21, 2019
StartActual
Oct 18, 2019
Primary completionActual
Feb 19, 2022
CompletionActual
Feb 11, 2023
Last update
Dec 20, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 20, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04064112
Lead sponsor
Chen Zhao
Collaborators
Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Tianjin Eye Hospital, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, AIER Eye Hospital (Kunming)
Responsible party
Chen Zhao (Vice President of Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 21, 2019
Start date
Oct 18, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 19, 2022
Completion
Feb 11, 2023
Last update
Dec 20, 2023

Study contacts

Chen Zhao, Doctor
study chair · Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University
Xiaoli Kang, Doctor
principal investigator · Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Yueping Li, Doctor
principal investigator · Tianjin Eye Hospital
Lianhong Zhou, Doctor
principal investigator · Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Jing Yao, Doctor
study director · Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University
Chenhao Yang, Doctor
principal investigator · Children's Hospital of Fudan University
Jiangtao Xu, Doctor
principal investigator · AIER Eye Hospital (Kunming)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion