A Phase 4 interventional study of Dextrose 50 in Rotator Cuff Tear, sponsored by Hadassah Medical Organization. Withdrawn at 1 site in Israel. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-23.
Sponsored by Hadassah Medical Organization · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
This is a Prospective Pilot Single Arm study on prolotherapy for the treatment of patients with pain due to Partial Rotator Cuff (RC) Tears of the Shoulder.
The aim of this trial is to study the effects of injected glucose on injured or degenerative RC tears of the shoulder. Glucose is not recognized by the FDA for this purpose but is used in 2 main concentrations: 50% solution to treat hypoglycemia and 5% solution for fluid replacement.
In the prolotherapy group, 20% dextrose will be injected into 4 locations of the affected shoulder. In the active control group, patients will receive a single injection of methylprednisolone into the subacromial bursa and 3 saline injections overlying the tendons.
Prolotherapy treatments have been used since the 1950s for the treatment of weakened or damaged soft tissue and cartilage. Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated an anabolic response leading to thickened collagen tissue following treatment. Prolotherapy has been used to treat various tendinopathies, non-specific low back pain whiplash injuries, and partial ligament and tendon tears. Injection solutions used in the past include P2G (phenol, glycerine and glucose), sodium morrhuate and simple dextrose. Today, most prolotherapists use simple dextrose as an off-label treatment. Current treatment methods of the RC have several short-comings. Steroid injections, the most commonly applied treatment today for RC tears, have a short term benefit at the very most and have been found, when repeated, to lead to deterioration in pain, function and even tendon structure. Surgery is expensive, requires a long rehabilitation program, and has a very significant re-tear rate. In addition, studies are not conclusive regarding its effectiveness as compared to conservative treatment for the treatment of RC tears. No prolotherapy studies have been performed in the treatment of partial RC tears. Considering the extent of this endemic disorder, it was decided to explore prolotherapy for the treatment of partial rotator cuff tears.
Patients will receive 3 monthly treatments all under ultrasound.
25 patients will be recruited to this Pilot study. It is impossible to make an accurate estimation of the sample size of the trial needed as no prolotherapy study has been done specifically on partial RC tears.
745 studies on the registry are indexed under Rotator Cuff Injuries; 163 are open to participants now.
Browse Rotator Cuff Injuries studies →Hadassah Medical Organization is the lead sponsor of 674 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Absolute contra-indications to having an MRI scan include any shrapnel in the brain or eye in particular and certain cardiac valves and pacemakers
Injection of 20% dextrose (50 % dextrose diluted with 0.5% lidocaine) into the rotator cuff tendinous insertions as well as into the tear. All injections are performed under ultrasound.
Drug: Dextrose 50
As above
Also known as: Glucose 50% solution
Numerical Rating Score (NRS) pain score: change in pain score over a follow-up period of 12 months: change in pain ratings as compared to pre-treatment ratings.
This is the pain score the patient estimates he or she suffers from between 0 and 10. This is the pain score the patient estimates he or she suffers from between 0 and 10. An independent investigator contacts patients during the follow-up period and questions them about pain and function
Time frame: At 3 points during the 12 month follow-up: 1, 6 and 12 months after the last treatment
Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS): change in function during a follow-up of 12 months as compared to pre-treatment scores
This is a questionnaire evaluating function that may or may not be affected specifically by the affected shoulder.
Time frame: At 3 points during the 12 month follow-up: 1, 6 and 12 months after the last treatment
Tear size as measured on MRI scanning
Measurement of tear size on the MRI scan. The MRI scans are read by a musculoskeletal radiologist who is blinded to the treatment arm
Time frame: 6 after the last treatment
Range of motion: change in range of motion over a period of 12 months as compared to pre-treatment scores.
Examination of passive range of motion of the shoulder. This is done by an independent researcher who is blinded to the treatment arm
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after the last treatment
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is withdrawn, as verified in May 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Hadassah Medical Organization →