CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04060667WIMSUpdated Jul 23, 2026Results posted

Wireless Physiologic Monitoring in Postpartum Women

An interventional study of Wireless physiologic monitoring in Maternal Death During Childbirth and Pregnancy Complications, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Uganda. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-23.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3,191
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To estimate the clinical effectiveness of wireless physiologic monitoring of women in the first 24 hours after cesarean delivery at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital

Read the detailed description

Women in sub-Saharan Africa have the highest rates of morbidity and mortality during childbirth. Despite significant increases in facility-based childbirth, quality gaps at the facility have limited reductions in maternal deaths. Infrequent monitoring of women around childbirth is a major gap in care that leads to delays in life-saving interventions. Simple increases in staffing will not overcome this gap, thus necessitating new strategies.

This project aims to use a simple wireless monitor to improve the detection of complications immediately after childbirth and allow clinicians to provide life-saving interventions when needed. Using a hybrid clinical effectiveness-implementation approach women delivered by cesarean in Mbarara, Uganda will be recruited to wear a wireless physiologic monitor for 24 hours after delivery and their delivering obstetricians recruited to use the monitoring system, including the receipt of text message alerts should women develop abnormalities in physiologic signs. Rates of morbidity and mortality will be compared with a control group of women delivered by the same obstetricians. Clinical adoption and implementation will be assessed with the RE-AIM implementation framework and semi-structured interviews.

02

Conditions studied

  • Maternal Death During Childbirth
  • Pregnancy Complications

Keywords

  • vital sign monitoring
  • maternal near miss
  • maternal mortality
  • maternal morbidity
  • physiologic monitoring
  • quality of care
  • inpatient monitoring
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Emergency cesarean delivery at MRRH
  • Able to provide consent or have a guardian/attendant present who can consent
  • Willing to wear the biosensor for 24 hours
  • Willing remain in the postpartum unit for 24 hours

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Admitted to ICU directly after delivery
  • Allergies or hypersensitivity to device materials
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
3,191 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Participants in the intervention arm were monitored for up to 24 hours after an emergency cesarean section using the Current Health wireless physiologic monitoring system, which includes a wearable biosensor that records heart rate, temperature, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and movement continuously and transmits data in real-time via a wireless network to the cloud.

    Combination Product: Wireless physiologic monitoring

  • No intervention
    control

    Participants in the control arm had standard of care monitoring, using available tools on the wards (manual heart rate, temperature, and respiratory rate calculations).

Interventions

  • Combination productWireless physiologic monitoring

    The intervention in this study is the use of a wireless monitor to perform physiologic monitoring of women undergoing emergency cesarean delivery for the first 24 hours after completion of the cesarean and send alerts to responding clinicians should vital signs fall out of a pre-specified range.

    Also known as: vital sign abnormality alerts

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Severe Maternal Outcome

    The primary effectiveness outcome was a composite measure of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) measured from enrollment until hospital discharge This composite measure is adapted from World Health Organization (WHO) near-miss morbidity criteria, as well as other severe maternal outcomes, including hysterectomy, cardiac arrest, prolonged unconsciousness, stroke, dialysis, intensive care admission, and death.

    Time frame: From completion of the cesarean delivery until hospital discharge from the procedure, an average of 3 days

06

Results

Posted Sep 9, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneInterventionControl
Started15521639
Completed14771629
Not completed7510
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up7510

Outcome measures

PrimarySevere Maternal Outcome

The primary effectiveness outcome was a composite measure of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) measured from enrollment until hospital discharge This composite measure is adapted from World Health Organization (WHO) near-miss morbidity criteria, as well as other severe maternal outcomes, including hysterectomy, cardiac arrest, prolonged unconsciousness, stroke, dialysis, intensive care admission, and death.

Time frame:
From completion of the cesarean delivery until hospital discharge from the procedure, an average of 3 days
Reported as:
Number · participants
Severe Maternal Outcome
participantsInterventionControl
Severe Maternal Outcome2525

Adverse events

Collected over Until hospital discharge, an average of 3 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intervention3/1,552 (0.2%)6/1,552 (0.4%)0/1,552 (0%)
Control1/1,629 (0.1%)12/1,629 (0.7%)0/1,629 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventInterventionControl
HysterectomyReproductive system and breast disorders3/15526/1629
ICU admissionSurgical and medical procedures2/15523/1629
Re-operationSurgical and medical procedures1/15522/1629
cardiac arrestCardiac disorders0/15521/1629

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)InterventionControlTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years155216293181
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)InterventionControlTotal
Mean26.0 ± 5.426.6 ± 5.826.3 ± 5.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)InterventionControlTotal
Female155216293181
Male000
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)InterventionControlTotal
Count of participants——0
Parity
Parity(number of pregnancies)InterventionControlTotal
Mean2.2 ± 1.62.2 ± 1.52.2 ± 1.5
Gestational Age
Gestational Age(completed weeks of gestation)InterventionControlTotal
Mean39.1 ± 2.539.2 ± 2.539.1 ± 2.5
07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital
    Mbarara, Uganda
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Boatin AA, Ngonzi J, Wylie BJ, Lugobe HM, Bebell LM, Mugyenyi G, Mohamed S, Martinez K, Musinguzi N, Psaros C, Metlay JP, Haberer JE. Wireless versus routine physiologic monitoring after cesarean delivery to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality in a resource-limited setting: protocol of type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Feb 12;21(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03550-w. PubMed 33579213 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Aug 20, 2021
  • Statistical analysis plan · Sep 26, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04060667
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Collaborators
Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Responsible party
Adeline A Boatin (Assistant Professor of OB/GYN, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 19, 2019
Start date
Jan 21, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2022
Completion
Dec 31, 2024
Results posted
Sep 9, 2025
Last update
Jul 23, 2026

Study contacts

Adeline A Boatin, MD MPH
principal investigator · MGH

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion