CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04050982AFCAREUpdated Sep 22, 2023Results posted

Feasibility Study to Improve AF Outcomes Using a Digital Application for CV Risk Reduction

An interventional study of AF CARE and Usual Care in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Stanford University. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-22.

Sponsored by Stanford University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Why this study was terminated
Acquisition of digital messaging company and decision made to withdraw study support
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
11
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The pilot portion of this study is to determine the feasibility of utilizing AF CARE to provide lifestyle modification support to patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

The prospective, RCT portion of this study compare cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF), AF knowledge, AF Symptom Severity and Burden, and QOL between and within the wait list group and the AF CARE group at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Text Messaging
  • Patient Education
  • Psychometric
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 924 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 144 across 2,380 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,117 studies on the registry; 425 are open to participants now.

Of its 259 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 197 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. BMI > 28 kg/m2 AND one additional CVRF using LS7
  2. Access and willingness to engage in digital technology
  3. Has a valid email address and a cell phone number
  4. Able to ambulate
  5. Able to speak/read English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Class III/IV heart failure
  2. MI or cardiac surgery in prior 3 months
  3. Severe renal/hepatic disease
  4. Active malignancy
  5. Current/recent (within 6 months) enrollment in weight loss program
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pilot Testing

    Patients interface with the digital application, providing feedback on usability and satisfaction.

    Device: AF CARE

  • Active comparator
    AF CARE plus Usual Care

    Patients will interface with the digital application.

    Device: AF CARE · Behavioral: Usual Care

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care then AF Care

    After a 6 month period of usual care only, patients will interface with the digital application.

    Behavioral: Usual Care

Interventions

  • DeviceAF CARE

    Patients will receive personalized messages twice weekly that will include behavior recommendations for CVRF reduction and AF education based on the initially entered psychographic profile and data entered.

  • BehavioralUsual Care

    Participants will be given recommendations for CVRF reduction based on their initial American Heart Association Life Simple 7 (LS7) assessment and will be provided educational materials and be wait listed for digital app 3 months later

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Text Messages That Were Reviewed

    Time frame: Baseline through month 6

  2. Percentage of Emails Opened and Clicked Through

    Percentage of emails opened, and of those opened, the percentage of emails clicked through

    Time frame: Baseline through month 6

  3. Cardiovascular Risk Factor Score

    The American Heart Association Life Simple 7 (LS7) is a calculated score using lab values, biometric measurements, and patient dietary responses. Score range: 0 to 10; 0 = most risk, 10 = least risk

    Time frame: Baseline, month 3, month 6, and month 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Knowledge Related to Atrial Fibrillation

    AF knowledge assessed with the Jessa AF Knowledge Score calculated from a 16 question self- reported questionnaire with a scoring range from 0-16, 16 indicating greater knowledge.

    Time frame: Baseline, month 3, month 6, and month 12

  2. Change From Baseline in AF Quality of Life Score

    Quality of Life assessed using a patient completed questionnaire, Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life Questionnaire (AFEQT). The AFEQT score is a combined score of 21 items; overall score range is 21 to 100, with a higher score representing greater QOL.

    Time frame: Baseline, month 3, month 6, and month 12

  3. Change From Baseline in AF Symptom Severity

    AF symptom severity assessed with the Atrial Fibrillation Symptoms Severity Scale (AFSS). The AFSS is a patient self-reported questionnaire that contains 21 questions, with 7 questions that provide calculated scores for AF symptom severity (0-35) with higher scores representing greater severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, month 3, month 6, and month 12

  4. Change From Baseline in AF Symptom Burden

    AF symptom burden assessed with the Atrial Fibrillation Symptom Severity Scale. The AFSS is a patient self-reported questionnaire that contains 21 questions that provides calculated scores for AF Burden, calculated in the following manner; AF Burden = AF frequency + AF duration + AF severity. Each of the 3 measures contribute equally to the AF burden score, and each measure ranges from 1-10 to yield Total AF Burden scores ranging from 3-30. Higher scores indicate greater AF burden.

    Time frame: Baseline, month 3, month 6, and month 12

07

Results

Posted Sep 22, 2023
Limitations and caveats
The study did not meet its planned enrollment size, and did not achieve statistical power.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePilot TestingAF CARE Plus Usual CareUsual Care Then AF Care
Started920
Interfaced with af care digital platform710
Completed710
Not completed210
Withdrew: Did not meet eligibility criteria010
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject100
Withdrew: Unable to enroll on platform100

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Text Messages That Were Reviewed
Time frame:
Baseline through month 6
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of texts
Percentage of Text Messages That Were Reviewed
percentage of textsPilot Testing
Percentage of Text Messages That Were Reviewed29.2 (0 to 60.0)
PrimaryPercentage of Emails Opened and Clicked Through

Percentage of emails opened, and of those opened, the percentage of emails clicked through

Time frame:
Baseline through month 6
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of emails
Percentage of Emails Opened and Clicked Through
percentage of emailsPilot Testing
Emails opened72.2 (19 to 97)
Emails clicked through74.3 (36 to 100)
PrimaryCardiovascular Risk Factor Score

The American Heart Association Life Simple 7 (LS7) is a calculated score using lab values, biometric measurements, and patient dietary responses. Score range: 0 to 10; 0 = most risk, 10 = least risk

Time frame:
Baseline, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Cardiovascular Risk Factor Score
score on a scaleAF CARE Plus Usual Care
baseline6.5 ± 0
month 38 ± 0
month 66.5 ± 0
month 127 ± 0
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Knowledge Related to Atrial Fibrillation

AF knowledge assessed with the Jessa AF Knowledge Score calculated from a 16 question self- reported questionnaire with a scoring range from 0-16, 16 indicating greater knowledge.

Time frame:
Baseline, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Knowledge Related to Atrial Fibrillation
score on a scaleAF CARE Plus Usual Care
baseline12 ± 0
month 311 ± 0
month 615 ± 0
month 1215 ± 0
SecondaryChange From Baseline in AF Quality of Life Score

Quality of Life assessed using a patient completed questionnaire, Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life Questionnaire (AFEQT). The AFEQT score is a combined score of 21 items; overall score range is 21 to 100, with a higher score representing greater QOL.

Time frame:
Baseline, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in AF Quality of Life Score
score on a scaleAF CARE Plus Usual Care
baseline82 ± 0
month 365 ± 0
month 667 ± 0
month 1251 ± 0
SecondaryChange From Baseline in AF Symptom Severity

AF symptom severity assessed with the Atrial Fibrillation Symptoms Severity Scale (AFSS). The AFSS is a patient self-reported questionnaire that contains 21 questions, with 7 questions that provide calculated scores for AF symptom severity (0-35) with higher scores representing greater severity.

Time frame:
Baseline, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in AF Symptom Severity
score on a scaleAF CARE Plus Usual Care
baseline0 ± 0
month 315 ± 0
month 621 ± 0
month 1223 ± 0
SecondaryChange From Baseline in AF Symptom Burden

AF symptom burden assessed with the Atrial Fibrillation Symptom Severity Scale. The AFSS is a patient self-reported questionnaire that contains 21 questions that provides calculated scores for AF Burden, calculated in the following manner; AF Burden = AF frequency + AF duration + AF severity. Each of the 3 measures contribute equally to the AF burden score, and each measure ranges from 1-10 to yield Total AF Burden scores ranging from 3-30. Higher scores indicate greater AF burden.

Time frame:
Baseline, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in AF Symptom Burden
score on a scaleAF CARE Plus Usual Care
baseline2 ± 0
month 316 ± 0
month 619 ± 0
month 1222 ± 0

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 12 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pilot Testing0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)
AF CARE Plus Usual Care0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Pilot TestingAF CARE Plus Usual CareTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years516
>=65 years415
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Pilot TestingAF CARE Plus Usual CareTotal
Female527
Male404
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Pilot TestingAF CARE Plus Usual CareTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino9211
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Pilot TestingAF CARE Plus Usual CareTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White628
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported202
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Pilot TestingAF CARE Plus Usual CareTotal
United States9211
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Stanford Health Care
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 17, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 22, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04050982
Lead sponsor
Stanford University
Collaborators
American Heart Association, PatientBond
Responsible party
Paul Wang (Director, Stanford Electrophysiology and Arrhythmia Service, Stanford University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 9, 2019
Start date
Oct 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 26, 2023
Completion
Jan 26, 2023
Results posted
Sep 22, 2023
Last update
Sep 22, 2023

Study contacts

Linda Ottoboni, PhD
principal investigator · Clinician and research scientist

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion